Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The problem with 'God' is trying and failing to understand it. The problem with accepting 'God' on that basis is, it's just faith. The good thing about 'God' is it gives you something to aim for if you are so inclined. That probably happens when you realise the 'world' is superficial and/or you are near death. Or......you could experience something that you just can't put into words because there are none to describe it.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A friend who teaches in a faith school told me

> that she has been disturbed by recent comments

> made by older teenagers in the sixth form who

> believe that being religious is 'good' and not

> being religious is 'bad'. One student asked her if

> she believed in 'god' and she would not say...


Why wouldn't she say?


The answer is yes, no, maybe


Unless she's a heathen frightened she may lose her job In a faith school.


How can sixth formers have any respect for a teacher Who is too timid to express her views?


Sixth formers are on the cusp - wrestling with ideas. It sounds as if the individuals concerned were a bit fundamentalist. Here was the teacher's chance to stretch them with different ideas/interpretation.


Far from her being 'disturbed' by such comments, she failed in her duty to question and offer alternative views here.


In short, she appears to be Michael Gove fodder and probably isn't up to the job.

Interesting use of the word 'heathen' there silverfox - it doesn't simply mean 'atheist' of course - it's used as a term to denote a class of subhuman who lacks the basic requirements of civilisation.


Contextually it seems it was related to biology? In that context a teacher would be quite within their rights not to answer a question about religious beliefs simply because it was an irrelevance and a distraction from the lesson at hand.


Education need a structure. Mind you, if this was an experienced teacher she'd have been used to diversionary tactics from precocious students.

Same at my school Jeremy, in fact a geography teacher had a slide show disproving all the so-called miracles. By the time we got to the sixth form we had come to the conclusion that 'god' was not going to solve humanity's problems and then we took up protesting at every opportunity.

Interestingly, my impression is that if this were a private faith school, the school would be required to justify the need for faith for a particular role - i.e. a biology teacher would not require faith and hence would be subject to anti-discrimination law.


If this were a state funded faith school (voluntary aided) they would not be subject to the anti-discrimination law - so the biology teacher may be required to have faith in order to keep their job.


Can anyone clear this one up?

I'm an atheist and I abhor the fact that my taxes are used to fund faith schools since it appears that the indoctrination of young people is rife and one would think that in this century religion should be losing adherents.

Is that correct H that a state funded faith school is not subject to the anti-discrimination law? You mean that these types of school are outside of that law? Crikey! It's worse than I thought.

  • 3 weeks later...
We're all just a bunch of wobbly chemicals with reactors giving us sense - common sense. We are all interconnected and not here for any reason other than that we exist. We'll die out as the dinosaurs did and other chemicals will bond and form new species - those stronger, smaller survivors, such as the afforementioned flesh eating worms will survive. Nature will evolve according to the most resilient living things - we are part of a process and our belief that we are more 'rightful' of a place on the planet than any other living thing, will be our downfall, as will our self obsession which is our main downfall and a seemingly inbuilt human defect which will be our end. It will take far more than 100 years however - time goes much quicker than future predictors usually envisage - look at 1984. We'll be here arguing for generations to come - I'd give it 1,000 or more years before the final human eyeball is sucked. Just make the most of it and for God's sake (?)leave some for someone else!
  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

One of the best analytical deconstructions of Christianity I've read by someone who enrolled on the Alpha Course. A long but riveting read.


http://alphacoursereview.wordpress.com/


?Whenever a man believes that he has the exact truth from God, there is in that man no spirit of compromise. He has not the modesty born of the imperfections of human nature; he has the arrogance of theological certainty and the tyranny born of ignorant assurance.? ? Robert G. Ingersoll

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, Looking for a bedframe with no head or footboard for a double mattress. Normal UK double. Ideally wood. If someone has one to sell or give away please get in touch, thank you!  
    • Great answer, but how do you then square it up with pension pots investments without adversely impacting future growth.  Buit of a tricky one as on one hand it should be nationalised but on the other we don't want to see future pension poverty relying on government top ups.  Far too complicated for a simple answer   
    • Driving down one of the side streets near the park last night we saw a group of kids in front holding a rope across the road. Did feel a little anxious and then when we got closer it turned out to be a harmless trick - nothing in the road/dangerous, just three kids on each side holding long twigs as if they were tugging a rope between them. i'm conflicted - quite a theatrical prank (I presume copied from online) but given the location could well have been the same group mentioned above. 
    • I have no idea, but not so difficult for one of them to stand to the side and record. In an odd way at least if they were doing it for social media it might explain the motivation, albeit misguided. Others may disagree, but that feels less worrying than a desire to intimidate.   I think comparable games like "knock down ginger" where children run away and/or momentarily stick their tongue out as cheeky gesture, have a different vibe to what is described here.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...