Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

I am led to believe that there are over 750 enlightened people in the world today,the majority of whom are from India.It is from the East that the oldest & most successful philosophies come.My philosophy tutor tells me we are all enlightened,we just dont realize it,so maybe we need to look no further than The East Dulwich forum for our answers!! Religion holds all the great truths,unfortunately they dont want us to know them,or we just might realize how free we really are.We are in a period of darkness as far as universal growth is concerned,but like everything,all is passing.It strikes me there are many brilliant minds on the forum,find yourselves a system and you will find your own answers from your own experiences.

Nigel

  • 3 weeks later...

I wonder whether the question itself is oxymoronic?


To be a 'great' surely you require the qualification of legacy - something you're unlikely to achieve in your own lifetime.


More than that, can thought itself be great? Certainly linguistic expression and artful arguments can be great - but it's a learned skill not a talent - and doesn't necessarily require great thinking.


And even then, what would make it great - that it is persuasive? That's one step further: an action not a contemplation.


And then would the act of persuasion be great in isolation - does it need to be judged by history as essentially constructive to be 'great'?

not being a great 'articulator' i was thinking more in terms of since the economic crash there does not seem to be a debate regarding alternative systems or ways of ordering things. i wondered whether this is part due to the fact that there are no 'philospohers' (for want of a better word to describe people who are turned to for an opinion as that's what they do, think).


but fair play huguenot, it's true, legacy counts for a lot. but i remain surprised at the lack of any new ideology rising from the financial ashes. trying to maintain the status quo seems to have been the only outcome.

Enoch Powell was considered to be one of the greatest thinkers that ever went into parliament,


and he was hounded out mainly because they were terrified of what he had to say.


I would suggest that any great thinkers around these parts would be well advised to keep silent, lest the same happens again, as history has a habit of repeating itself.

Eh? Enoch left the Tories for taking us into the EC, he wasn't hounded out of anything.

He continued to serve as an MP until the late 80s when his great thinking included accusing the CIA of murdering Mountbatten. Yeeeeeeesss.

He lost his seat because the electorate weren't interested in what he ahd to say, not because they couldn't handle the truth or some nonsense.


But nice attempt at twisting reality.

I assume by great thinkers in these parts you refer to yourself?


Still waiting to see those rivers of blood mind.

Steve T


Enoch Powell's Rivers of Blood speech was not 'great thinking'..it was deeply unpleasant political opportunism by a man who absolutely realised the effect it would have..one of which was to make life significantly more unpleasant, the very next day, for many people from ethnic minorities.

In fact he could almost be characterised as sulky, small minded and vain. He certainly had superiority complex (a neurotic mechanism for compensation for feelings of inferiority).


It all went wrong when we gave India independence (he wanted to be the Governor General an put the locals in their place).


After that he saw traitors everywhere, mainly to project his own inadequacies onto others.


He always said that he wished he'd died in the war. He clearly saw himself as a glorious hero, but didn't want to get found out by actually being alive. It's kind of a meoldramatic, self-obsessed suicide. If he was a member of your family you'd probably think of him as the annoying attention seeking one.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Not really since the first world war, and mainly in the sense then of 'getting a Blighty one' meaning a wound so serious you had to be sent home. I seriously doubt if one school child in 100 now would know what Blighty meant if the word was presented on its own with no context. 
    • 1 space available due to one of my clients moving.  Message me for more informations  🙂  
    • Why is the name a big of a red flag? Blighty is a common name for the UK whatever people might think.
    • The only election which counts is the General Election.  There is still strong resentment for fourteen year's of Conservative rule. They squeezed the working class's way to hard, then they squeezed the middle class, but somehow the upper class never got touched, funny that.   There is also new resentment for Labour because of the utter balls up they've made of things since coming to power nine months ago. The majority of the population (or at least those with an ounce of common sense) want these clowns out of office ASAP because they see the damage they are doing to UK plc. They squeezed the pensioners, then the farmers and then business. They made and broke promise after promise, or just didn't tell the truth or say what they where going to do, otherwise known as merely lying to get elected. Inflation may be falling but the cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised. They will never be trusted once they are ousted from power in about four and a half years time.   Everything they do and touch causes further harm, led by three stooges, Rayner, Reeves and balls'less Starmer, who couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag. He still thinks he's a solicitor at the DPP. Rather than spending week upon week getting involved in international politics he needs to be sorting out the UK's issues, sadly he's not up to the job and nor are his Cabinet.  Society needs a mix of people with different skills to prosper, not more and more graduates who can't get jobs in what they studied in.   Reform is the current anti establishment party, which will hopefully wither away back to where it came from.  The Liberals and Greens, well what can you say apart from using them as another alternative vote of dissatisfaction, but neither will come to power.  The country seriously needs stability and a Government that stands up for and represents it's people, not what MP's want but what the constituencies want and need.  Government needs to become far more open and transparent, it needs to be seen to be doing its job, doing what MP's are elected to do,  working for the people in the constituencies, getting back to basic principles and rebuilding the trust which has been lost by successive party's immaterial of them being, red, blue, light blue, yellow, green or some other colour.     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...