Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Netquest Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> where i am from

> (originally) the tubes run computer controlled.

> They don't strick and are on time.

>

> Surely a first world country can resolve this

> situation....


Fair enough, but do you know how old the tube network is? I doubt that retro-fitting a system like that would be possible.

I don't think it's as easy as that NetQuest.


Let's say that each tube strike costs the economy 50m a day...


In financial terms, the drivers would initially go on strike indeterminately as soon as the subject of driverless trains was suggested.


Since the process from initiation to completion would probably be around twenty years, that's 365 billion in lost productivity just to start off with.


You'd have a breakdown in faith in both London and the UK on both economic, trading and tourist terms - perhaps 20 trillion?


You'd have wildcat and sympathetic strikes in other industries that restricted productivity - another 5 trillion?


Mass unemployment from the consequent economic downturn would cause huge civil unrest, rioting and a general breakdown of law and order.


So yes, I guess it's that simple really ;-)


That's why nobody likes a breakdown in labour relations.

I don't think that's happening either.


The tube is part of a huge transport infrastructure that needs comprehensive management - but it's offtopication.


My point is that whether it's the Royal Mail, the Tube or the Miners, striking has a massive social impact, is rarely well thought through, and often counter-productive.


The Royal Mail can't be saved by strikes, and doesn't deserve to be saved by money.

Is the right to strike not something enshrined and valued in modern, liberal (small L) society?


Consequences for strikers? Such as? The sack? And that would achieve.....what exactly?


Whilst I acknowledge the need for a modern, efficient postal service it is an arena where a well-run monopoly service is the norm and the most sensible option. Attempts to privatise the domestic post beyond the current courier services (DHL, TNT and the like) would seem complex and counter productive.


Postal workers have been treated pretty shabbily by management in this whole thing, and when no other action works, striking is often a necessary recourse. And long may it remain so.

Wll yes, d_c but people don't get paid when they're striking so democratic rights are balanced by personal responsibility.


I'd argue that an efficient postal service is an anachronism in the modern age. An email has equivalent weight in law, read or unread (just like a mail).


So what actually gets delivered? Junk and packages.


Mail is dead!


Privatise!!!

Let's be clear here - i am not moaning about the posty(ies)!


My problem is with the higher management of the royal mail, the goverment, and anybody else who supported and is using privat carriers. That got the royal mail into this state.


Having said, i use privat firms too now and think it's too late to not to.

That's simply not the case Netquest.


I know Adam Crozier, and he's a very astute businessman.


The Royal Mail's in trouble because there is no requirement for the 1950's dream.


These poor guys are hamstrung because the population insists that the deliver a pastoral service ("my lovely postie") in a world that has no need for it.


We don't write letters any more, we have no need of it. So all they do is scrag along on junk mail and packages which are better delivered by blue collar unemployables and private business respectively.


If you demand some Christmas Card emotional validation, then pay a quid for it, not a first class stamp.

So a decent postal service is a 1950 dream?


Well if one only privatises the money making bits of publics companies then all one is left with unworkable sceletons.


The royal mail needs the income from parcerls and businesses to make money. We all know that it is not feasable to deliver a letter for the price of a second class stamp across the country!


Anyway, i might just be a socialist, which does appear to be a 1950 dream in this money grabbing sociaty these days....

Where are you coming from NQ?


What is a decent postal service? 150,000 people walking the streets delivering junk mail that nobody wants for salaries that exceed the price paid?


Are you saying that the post service is a government service that should be subsidised by tax payers to pay for direct marketers to send junk that we don't want? You want to subsidise private business?


You may not realise it, but that's what you're proposing.


The problem with socialists is they want everything for nothing, they hope to hide the cost in taxes.


Please God, don't call me a capitalist w@anker, you'll only demonstrate how few of my posts you've read.

I get very little posted junk mail at all. I think the vast majority of junk mail is sent electronically or posted through the door locally. I love getting post (not so much the bills). I wish it was still the days of knowing your postie, but it seems to be a different one everytime. I think they have lost the pride in their work that they used to be famous for. Last week a postperson bizaarly posted our letters under our garden gate (in the rain) so I got home to a pile of soggy post. I don't know what the solution is though because it just isn't cost effective anymore.
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...