Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So my youngest, who is in year 2, has come home with a permission slip from school to sign for the flu jab. I've been very diligent with all jabs to date but I'm really not feeling mindful to consenting to this, probably because I have two elder children who have got by without this.


Am open to a massive discussion. What do others think about the rights and wrongs of this latest vaccination?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/74396-flu-jab-for-year-1-and-year-2/
Share on other sites

I remember having proper flu as couple of times as a child, it was horrible and left me with chest infections that lingered for months. My youngest had the vaccination last year (a nose spray rather than a jab)glad to hear my eldest will be able to have it this year too.

With reference to TE44's comment above, last year there was a "drift" where the main strain of flu going around turned out to be slightly different to what was predicted by the WHO etc. this is actually pretty rare and I'd say understandable given that the predication has to be made well in advance of flu season to allow time for enough vaccines to be made. Last years jab still protected against some of the other strains that were going around, but over all it wasn't as effective as normal.


Personally it doesn't put me off getting the jab, I'm asthmatic and I've had it for years, most of the time the prediction is pretty good but even when it's not spot on, I'd rather have protection against some strains than against none.

Predicating uptake of flu vaccine on not previously having had flu in the preceeding years is not an immunologically sound course of action, due to the variable nature of the virus.


Children are at a higher risk of complications such as pneumonia. Plus they continue shedding live virus much loner than adults, even after symptoms resolve. So they have a high potential of infecting others.


Of children with serious complications, about half have no underlying health conditions. Which is to say that healthy children are about equally at risk of flu-related serious morbidity or mortality.


This is a fairly easy read: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/832632.

xx

Because I don't want him to have the flu spray .

I wouldn't have it ( and I had awful flu for the first time ever when I was pregnant with him so I know what it's like ) . I don't feel I have to give my child a jab for every single thing going and he has had enough jabs .

Flu jabs and chicken pox jabs ( I had chicken pox twice and measles ) , where will it stop ? Colds ? Stomach aches ?

Freedom of choice . By all means others can take it up as I know some people like Kez have asthma and underlying health issues etc but I don't think anyone should be pressured into having it done.

Good reminder to get my nearly 3 year old vaccinated - they do the spray for free at the GP. She had it last year. My younger child was premature and susceptible to respiratory problems so I'm getting the jab and will be getting my husband to have one too. Want to ensure she is protected as far as possible.

devsdev Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Follow up on this thread - does anyone know where

> can I get the nasal spray for an 18 month old? GP

> won't do it. Haven't tried Boots/Sainsbury yet but

> will do. Thank you!


Under 2 yo, you will have to get the jab, spray not suitable. NHS is only offering it to 'at risk' babies. You should be able to get it at a private clinic such as South London Travel Clinic. xx

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yep, of course I do - did you not read the bit from the survey about the noise having a negative impact on foraging bats? And like @Angelina I'm aware it affects other people, and if no one complains then it gives them an argument that's it's all ok.  The tree in question was a cherry that everyone loves, didn't need to be touched, and the council admitted was a mistake and shouldn't have happened.  The council and Gala use the 'local' narrative as a benefit, without any figures to back it up. It is used as an argument for the event to go ahead, when there's no basis of fact. The attendees are clearly not local as they've proved they don't give a **** about the area. The council do tell us where the money is spent - 100% on running the Events dept, and a myriad of unlisted free events. They just don't tell us how much, so that we can make an informed decision on whether the gain is with the pain.  Sorry, what was your point again?
    • Leon came this evening and did a small job.  He was able to fit me, which I’m grateful for.  He arrived when he said he would. Very professional & friendly guy, offered great advice and very reasonable prices.  Highly recommend Leon! 👍  
    • Lots of people are concerned about the impact on the environment.  I’m not personally bothered by the noise but I know people are and I will therefore lend my support in challenging the management and location of the event.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...