Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Croissants don't provide the chances to patronise that they used to.


Thirty-five years ago, when croissants were still VERY novel, a friend and I went into a bakery where they were on offer -- sign above the basket -- "Croissants (kwah-SAWHN)". He turned to me and said, "See? They even tell you how to pronounce it in Korean."

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well I've had a lovely evening. I went to the

> Harvester in Petts Wood with friends and I made

> merry on a few bottles of Malbec. I wasn't

> remotely patronised by the free salad bar, the

> steak and chips for main, nor the chocolate

> brownie sundae for dessert. Not a croissant in

> sight, and I'm now sat here smiling at the bizarre

> comments above. You people really do need to get

> out more, rather than waiting on poking my fire

> every single time I express a honest held straight

> talking opinion.

>

> Louisa.


In fairness Lou, you are my favourite poke


Glad you had a good evening, i've only driven through Petts Wood


How was the steak?

Thank you Seabag. It was slightly too well done for my liking, when I ask for a medium-rare I expect that, but you can't have everything. Petts Wood is a quiet area, very suburban. The crooked billet is the pub, a prominent position on the right heading towards the town centre. It's one of those old school Harvester's, I only really go for the salad bar if I'm being honest. It is what it is, but I had a lovely evening :)


Louisa.

Good to see Louisa et al prefer powder - most hipsters do too - they like that vintage approach. Sadly mustard powder degenerates very quickly and loses its potency and flavour so all you're mixing is a nasally-hot chalky paste without the compplex and delicate notes of real mustard.


Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wot, you take powdered mustard with you?


Every gourmand knows to carry a small pouch of (preferably mixed nigra, juncea & hirta - but there are purists around and their views are to be respected) mustard seed and a compact (bronze) mortar and pestle to grind the seeds to a mustardy consistency before adding (from a discreet flask) a measure of room-temperature Welsh spring water and leaving for 30 minutes.


Powder.


Ha.

There's nothing wrong with carrying a sachet of powder in your pocket. Most restaurants should and usually would be most obliging when it comes to respecting that those of a certain age (and allegedly hipsters too?), prefer to mix it themselves rather than have the inferior stuff from a jar.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's nothing wrong with carrying a sachet of

> powder in your pocket. Most restaurants should and

> usually would be most obliging when it comes to

> respecting that those of a certain age (and

> allegedly hipsters too?), prefer to mix it

> themselves rather than have the inferior stuff

> from a jar.

>

> Louisa.


What's inferior about the stuff from a jar Louisa? Sounds a little pretentious, nay....'patronising' of you to look down on jars of mustard.


For the record, I like to use both. The powdered stuff for adding to pastry, sauces and so on. The jar for roast beef/steaks and sandwiches. Haven't thought the stuff in jars was inferior. The mustard shop in Norwich is a delight (much as I hate Norwich itself).

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > There's nothing wrong with carrying a sachet of

> > powder in your pocket. Most restaurants should

> and

> > usually would be most obliging when it comes to

> > respecting that those of a certain age (and

> > allegedly hipsters too?), prefer to mix it

> > themselves rather than have the inferior stuff

> > from a jar.

> >

> > Louisa.

>

> What's inferior about the stuff from a jar Louisa?

> Sounds a little pretentious, nay....'patronising'

> of you to look down on jars of mustard.

>

> For the record, I like to use both. The powdered

> stuff for adding to pastry, sauces and so on. The

> jar for roast beef/steaks and sandwiches. Haven't

> thought the stuff in jars was inferior. The

> mustard shop in Norwich is a delight (much as I

> hate Norwich itself).


Ingredients for Colemans Mustard in a Jar..


Water, MUSTARD flour (21%), sugar, salt, WHEAT flour, turmeric, acid (citric acid).


Thats why it's inferior...


Nothing to do about being pretentious, 'patronising'


It's Sweet and nasty..


Foxy

It still doesn't detract from the wider argument that some people will indeed eat anything if it's labelled correctly and 'right on' enough. Lidl supermarkets a great case study. Disregarded for many years as a sub-standard cheap shop aimed primarily at 'poor income households' and shunned by the middle classes, is now one of the most popular and resounding retail success stories of our current decade. Why? Because, some people, believe the hype and crap the media and trendies feed them rather than shop somewhere because it's actually a good shop with some great bargains. I wish the posh folk weren't in there so regularly nowadays, might keep the queues down for the rest of us.


Louisa.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Some people here on EDF would eat Lark's Vomit if

> on sale in East Dulwich at ?20.00 a teaspoon..

>

> I jest not...

>

> Foxy.


Only in powder form, in a twee tin. Anything else would be pretentious and patronising.




Facking hell. Jars of Colmans English Mustard to join the dizzy ranks of gourmet burgers, pizza, omelettes & croissants on The List.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It still doesn't detract from the wider argument

> that some people will indeed eat anything if it's

> labelled correctly and 'right on' enough. Lidl

> supermarkets a great case study. Disregarded for

> many years as a sub-standard cheap shop aimed

> primarily at 'poor income households' and shunned

> by the middle classes, is now one of the most

> popular and resounding retail success stories of

> our current decade. Why?


Because, some people,

> believe the hype and crap the media and trendies

> feed them rather than shop somewhere because it's

> actually a good shop with some great bargains. I

> wish the posh folk weren't in there so regularly

> nowadays, might keep the queues down for the rest

> of us.



Because food has become bloody expensive and everyone is watching their pennies more than they were a few years ago.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Are there any other executors? Is the solicitor a soke practioner or part of a firm? Are you and your fellow beneficiaries behaving well?  You will want to take proper  legal advice (which this is not) but you can have an executor removed by the court if they are refusing to communicate with you. I would just do that. Tell him you are doing it, tell him you have reported him to the Law Society (if you have) and tell him you will be challenging his fees with the legal services ombudsman. This all sounds outrageous to me and this solicitor doesn't sound fit to practice. Three years sounds far too long for a low value estate comprising mostly of a house. He should have sold that or rented it out whilst he was waiting to administer the estate.    Sounds like he has cost you all a lot of money.  
    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...