Jump to content

Camberwell Bakerloo extension looking unilkely


Recommended Posts

What a shocker. All their previous pronouncements on this made it quite clear which option was their preferred one. Let's leave tens of thousands of existing residents in tubeless, congested isolation and spend eye-watering amounts on infrastructure for neighbourhoods which don't even exist yet. Definitely the correct priority. This was Walworth Road's one hope for relief which will now never come.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Camberwell is served by the well connected Denmark Hill and is a short walk from other stations. OKR has nothing. And there are tens of thousands of existing residents there as well.


In an ideal world, there would be two new lines/extensions coming down both ways. But I can see why OKR would get the nod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There'll be plenty of money/ lobbying behind the OKR route - I noticed quite a few new developments going up when I last drove through that area. Some of them even reference the Bakerloo line in their promotional materials. There are also loads of businesses along the road that would love more traffic and will surely help to push for it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lazero Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There'll be plenty of money/ lobbying behind the

> OKR route - I noticed quite a few new developments

> going up when I last drove through that area. Some

> of them even reference the Bakerloo line in their

> promotional materials. There are also loads of

> businesses along the road that would love more

> traffic and will surely help to push for it.



What happened to the commitment made by the mayor


http://www.southwarklabour.co.uk/get-involved/extend-the-bakerloo.aspx


http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/boris-johnson-bakerloo-line-extension-to-peckhams-time-has-come-8540510.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What happened to the commitment made by the mayor


Easy for him to pledge to do some very expensive things, though they aren't always realistically achievable. If/ when they have to choose just one option in London - "opportunity areas" always seem to be the main focus. I wish they wouldn't forget the areas left in between.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lazero Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What happened to the commitment made by the

> mayor

>

> Easy for him to pledge to do some very expensive

> things, though they aren't always realistically

> achievable. If/ when they have to choose just one

> option in London - "opportunity areas" always seem

> to be the main focus. I wish they wouldn't forget

> the areas left in between.


There is a business/regeneration case for OKR.

But they should think about both if they promise or not promise at all.


It's not Peckham - but Walworth road and Camberwell which could with something.

But it's 2015 and we are talking about 2030 - we might have flying cars aka Back to the Future :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

monkeylite Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Pretty sure there are people who lives around OKR

> who pays their taxes as well.



But if they promise one thing then can you trust them with whatever

they promise again - 10 years before anything will ever start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Camberwell/W Road is already helping to solve the problem of lack of housing: just look at the large developments as you go down from Camberwell Green. However, being part of the solution to that problem means adding to the one of transport because there will be hundreds more people wanting to get to and from their new homes.

I really hope Camberwell does get some form of rail transport, being it "BR", Tube or Overground. I'm so longing for a faster option that I'd even settle for a guided bus....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Camberwell/W Road is already helping to solve the

> problem of lack of housing: just look at the large

> developments as you go down from Camberwell Green.

> However, being part of the solution to that

> problem means adding to the one of transport

> because there will be hundreds more people wanting

> to get to and from their new homes.

> I really hope Camberwell does get some form of

> rail transport, being it "BR", Tube or Overground.

> I'm so longing for a faster option that I'd even

> settle for a guided bus....


Exactly the point of Section 106 money. I don't understand why the council haven't leveraged these new developments which are going up all along the Thameslink link running through Camberwell, to reopen the station?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still not great for those heading directly north. It shouldn't be a case of either/or anyway. Both options should be built.


monkeylite Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Camberwell is served by the well connected Denmark

> Hill and is a short walk from other stations. OKR

> has nothing. And there are tens of thousands of

> existing residents there as well.

>

> In an ideal world, there would be two new

> lines/extensions coming down both ways. But I can

> see why OKR would get the nod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that they mention reopening Camberwell overground station. Useful, but doesn't really address the core issue of more direct access north to the Waterloo area.


Sweptwind Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://content.tfl.gov.uk/board-20151217-pt1-item0

> 5-commissioner-report.pdf

>

> Page 38 refers to the Bakerloo Line extension. The

> rest is worth a read too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • To which one do you refer - the original OHS consultation from 2017? BTW here are the guidelines on consultations: Consultation is technically any activity that gives local people a voice and an opportunity to influence important decisions. It involves listening to and learning from local people before decisions are made or priorities are set.    It seems the voice only apllies if constituents agree with the council's proposals...if they disagree thays when they claim "this was not a referendum".  ...you forgot to mention that the polling was conducted amongst those who live WITHIN an LTN...an important, perhaps deliberate, ommission in your part..
    • Ahh, the local election where even if Labour said they were going to slaughter all first born, people would still have voted for them to stick one to Boris snd the tories 🤣 You really can't take that as an endorsement for a scheme that felt marginal compared to how people felt about bigger issues..
    • @Earl Aelfheah do you find living on a busy and polluted road funny? Why? I simply can't afford moving away - is this amusing and if so, why?
    • They have. They asked in the original consultation. I’ve talked about it above. Around 3000 people (57% of a self selecting sample), were against the scheme. But the point you seem to be struggling with is that it wasn’t a referendum. We don't routinely have referenda on matters public policy in the UK (Brexit aside). We elect people to make decisions and then we judge the quality of those decisions in the round, and either re-elect them, or kick them out. That’s representative democracy. It’s not a good idea imo, but happy to listen if you do want to make the case for the routine use of referenda in matters of public policy. Not so much if you just want to use it selectively for a single issue you feel strongly about. Still ducking the question I’ve posed to you more than once now on claim of inadequate signage and intimidation of emergency services I note. I actually think the majority quietly support the local LTN. The local elections suggest that most people either support it, or don’t feel strongly enough either way for it to stop them re-electing those who oversaw the implementation (even though opposition voices touted the local elections as a referendum on the LTN). Polling across London suggest most Londoners support them generally. Again, I don’t believe in routinely holding referenda on matters of public policy. There are many reasons for this but that's another thread. Hopefully any sensible person reflecting on it for a second will understand the reasons why it wouldn’t be desirable. As above, if you're just interested in using it selectively for a single issue you feel strongly about, I'm not really interested. ....Still waiting for someone to defend One Dulwich’s claims as laid out above. 🥱
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...