Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 7 months later...
It's interesting to see the comments above about Piplings and posts being taken down. We have first hand experience of the nursery and while the care is generally good, the company is badly let down by the administrative and management side of things (even by normal nursery standards). There have been some great staff working there but there is a high staff turnover because the management is difficult to deal with. There are lots of comments on the EDF about how difficult they are to get hold of when you are trying to register and secure a place, but they also remain difficult to get hold of when you are paying them fees every month. It is a nice property with a great garden but communication with parents is poor and family events are rare (no sports day, nothing for Christmas, no parents meetings, etc). Other nurseries around ED are a lot more inclusive for parents. Also day to day things like no trips for the children and they rarely ever bring artwork, cards, etc home (things which really brighten your day when you get home from work!). I think potential clients are too easily wowed by the lovely property and because of this there is an arrogance about the management that they don't have to try hard with other aspects of your nursery experience. Personally I don't think it's worth the additional fees they try to charge and there are better nurseries locally that ironically are charging less.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...