Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi I had a car accident last year and hurt my back and 18 months and much hospital/doctor care later I still cannot drive for long periods without major pain which is affecting my job.


I was loath to contact the ambulance chaser no win no fee people, has anyone else used anything similar or prive solicitor for this sort of claim?


thanks

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7806-accident-compensation/
Share on other sites

Be terribly careful with no win no fee lawyers, because they do exactly what it says on the can.


If you win, their fees need to be paid.


Surprisingly often, cases will be won, but only with minimal compensation.


This means that you'll win 1,000 pounds damages, and be faced with a lawyer's bill of 10,000 to 15,000. It'll make you cry.

"Be terribly careful with no win no fee lawyers, because they do exactly what it says on the can.


If you win, their fees need to be paid.


Surprisingly often, cases will be won, but only with minimal compensation.


This means that you'll win 1,000 pounds damages, and be faced with a lawyer's bill of 10,000 to 15,000. It'll make you cry."


Sorry, but this is bollocks. Conditional fee agreements ("no win, no fee") are now so widespread for personal injury work that you'd be hard pushed to find a lawyer who didn't offer them. For an explanation of how it works, see here


Having said that, I definitely wouldn't go for anyone who advertises on TV. The Solicitors Regulatory Authority operate an accreditation scheme for different areas of practice, including personal injury, so I would look for a local firm who have one or more solicitors acredited under the scheme. Go and see them and ask them to talk you through everything, including the risks, and don't sign up unless they inspire confidence. Good luck.

The fact that it's widespread doesn't mean that it's always good unfortunately DaveR, just like gonnorhea.


The other thing people get confused about with 'no win no fee' is that it's perceived to be a no lose gamble. It's not.


If you lose, you may be liable for your opponents expenses, and any other disbursements made in bringing the case. To cover these you may have to take out insurance policies, and may have to take out loans to cover the premium.


You could easliy find yourself 1,000 to 2,000 pounds out of pocket for a losing a 'no win no fee' case.


In fact, since you won't hear it from me, here's the Citizen's Advice Bureau....


"Few consumers seem to understand the risks and liabilities they are exposing themselves to as the risks of conditional fee agreements have not been clearly explained to them at the outset by salesmen. Consumers are misled into thinking the system will be genuinely ?no win no fee? but can often find that costs are hidden and unpredictable.


Loan financed insurance premiums, in addition to other legal costs, can often erode the value of claimants? compensation. In some cases consumers even owe money at the end of the process. This turns the whole claims process into a zero-sum gain for consumers and denies effective access to compensation."

I never said it was good, H, just that you can't damn any group lawyers on the basis that they engage in work on those terms, or conclude that it can never benefit a claimant. I think your post could be interpreted as a general condemnation, which is unwarranted (or to use the legal term, "bollocks").
I was run over (badly) 12 yrs ago and had some terrible solictors who added to the misery. At the last minute I changed to someone called Colin Ettinger who closed the deal within a month. Worth googling him- and even if it's too small for him he might be able to recommend someone good. And yes, be careful, lots of sharks out there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
    • No party is willing to tackle the "elephant in the room" which is the national debt. It is costing the country circa £100 Billion ANNUALLY to service that debt. That is more than the defence and education budgets. That debt burden has to be reduced which in reality means cost cuts. That means cutting back state pensions, index-linked pensions for civil servants and others such as police, NHS etc. It means cutting back on universal credit and cutting the number of people who are claiming benefits.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...