Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi I had a car accident last year and hurt my back and 18 months and much hospital/doctor care later I still cannot drive for long periods without major pain which is affecting my job.


I was loath to contact the ambulance chaser no win no fee people, has anyone else used anything similar or prive solicitor for this sort of claim?


thanks

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7806-accident-compensation/
Share on other sites

Be terribly careful with no win no fee lawyers, because they do exactly what it says on the can.


If you win, their fees need to be paid.


Surprisingly often, cases will be won, but only with minimal compensation.


This means that you'll win 1,000 pounds damages, and be faced with a lawyer's bill of 10,000 to 15,000. It'll make you cry.

"Be terribly careful with no win no fee lawyers, because they do exactly what it says on the can.


If you win, their fees need to be paid.


Surprisingly often, cases will be won, but only with minimal compensation.


This means that you'll win 1,000 pounds damages, and be faced with a lawyer's bill of 10,000 to 15,000. It'll make you cry."


Sorry, but this is bollocks. Conditional fee agreements ("no win, no fee") are now so widespread for personal injury work that you'd be hard pushed to find a lawyer who didn't offer them. For an explanation of how it works, see here


Having said that, I definitely wouldn't go for anyone who advertises on TV. The Solicitors Regulatory Authority operate an accreditation scheme for different areas of practice, including personal injury, so I would look for a local firm who have one or more solicitors acredited under the scheme. Go and see them and ask them to talk you through everything, including the risks, and don't sign up unless they inspire confidence. Good luck.

The fact that it's widespread doesn't mean that it's always good unfortunately DaveR, just like gonnorhea.


The other thing people get confused about with 'no win no fee' is that it's perceived to be a no lose gamble. It's not.


If you lose, you may be liable for your opponents expenses, and any other disbursements made in bringing the case. To cover these you may have to take out insurance policies, and may have to take out loans to cover the premium.


You could easliy find yourself 1,000 to 2,000 pounds out of pocket for a losing a 'no win no fee' case.


In fact, since you won't hear it from me, here's the Citizen's Advice Bureau....


"Few consumers seem to understand the risks and liabilities they are exposing themselves to as the risks of conditional fee agreements have not been clearly explained to them at the outset by salesmen. Consumers are misled into thinking the system will be genuinely ?no win no fee? but can often find that costs are hidden and unpredictable.


Loan financed insurance premiums, in addition to other legal costs, can often erode the value of claimants? compensation. In some cases consumers even owe money at the end of the process. This turns the whole claims process into a zero-sum gain for consumers and denies effective access to compensation."

I never said it was good, H, just that you can't damn any group lawyers on the basis that they engage in work on those terms, or conclude that it can never benefit a claimant. I think your post could be interpreted as a general condemnation, which is unwarranted (or to use the legal term, "bollocks").
I was run over (badly) 12 yrs ago and had some terrible solictors who added to the misery. At the last minute I changed to someone called Colin Ettinger who closed the deal within a month. Worth googling him- and even if it's too small for him he might be able to recommend someone good. And yes, be careful, lots of sharks out there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...