Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Very odd event this morning. I arranged with the council refuse service to pick up some bulky rubbish this morning ( actually 2 terminally broken mobility scooters), and as requested put them out in the front garden last night.


My elderly neighbour told me that this morning about 7.30am, she saw a white lorry outside our house, looking much like the one that the council use for such pick-ups, and two men wearing reflective jackets got out, and one started taking photographs of our house.


The scooters were actually picked up by the council this afternoon, and when I spoke to someone from the environment dept on the phone they said there was no record of them having been round in the morning. I've reported it to the police. I wondered if these guys were "casing the joint". Has anyone else seen anything like this?


We also by the way got 3 separate rings on the doorbell from guys with vans wanting to know if I'd like them to take our "scrap" away.


Ruth

hmmm strange . I had some furniture on my doorstep a few weeks ago that I was going to put on EDF. as i left my house there were 2 guys in reflective jackets getting ready to carry it away - they said " we've come for the furniture is that right?" not 100% I thought, but save me the hassle. Disappeared in a white van.
I hope for your sake,Ruthmct, they weren't casing your place. With regard to people removing things before the council get there, I tend to leave an item out for a few days, if it doesn't go I then call the council - saves resources!
There where these guys acting really suspicious outsie my gaff the othher day. Unloading planks, turning round hitting each other with the planks, accidentally ducking and missing them, the odd custard pie. They then jumped into a pretty ramshackle old looking car, whose wheels fell off when the one with the spinning button hole tried to start it

ruthmct Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My elderly neighbour told me that this morning

> about 7.30am, she saw a white lorry outside our

> house, looking much like the one that the council

> use for such pick-ups, and two men wearing

> reflective jackets got out, and one started taking

> photographs of our house.


This is only a possibility but the council workmen might have been moonlighting. They turned up early to see whether the 'scooters' were worth selling to a third party (hence the photographs) but either decided they weren't worth the trouble or couldn't find a buyer during the course of the day? The other three callers might have been scrap dealers contacted by the council workers, who were trying to cut them out of the deal?

We also by the way got 3 separate rings on the doorbell from guys with vans wanting to know if I'd like them to take our "scrap" away.



They have a value to the scrapmen for the batteries and possibly the motors, I would have told them to help themselves if you had wanted to be rid of them, maybe if they come back ask how much they will give you for them you might get a fiver or so, but the council will give you nothing.

I dont think anyone is casing the joint the council man who took the photo was probably sending that to the scrapmen so they new which door to knock in the road.

Tell them you want a tenner for them or the council can have them, you might get a bottle of drinkable wine out of it for negotiating.

We also had someone knock on the door this week. The first being a young boy of approx 15 asking if we wanted our hedge cut (roughly 9.45 in the morning) and yesterday a man in his 30`s at lunch time asking if the bits we have stacked in the garden were scrap, He was told to help himself but he didn`t take a thing.
I think the photographs are normal council procedures as I've noticed them doing this when they've picked stuff up from us in the past. I assumed they wanted to cover themselves in case it's alleged they took away something they weren't supposed to.

Hi,

Various Council departments and utility services do take photo's of properties and I believe you should challenge them for their identification. Also taking photo's are private investigator's and Bailiffs to prove that they have attended the address. The photo is sent with the report to the bank or finance house so that they may take a decision whether to pursue the debt further or place a charge on the property.


The simple advice is always take a description of the person, vehicle and importantly the vehicle registration mark, this will help either the police or council to identify the department and the reason for the photo.


And finally..... Burglers do not take photo's as the camera has probably been stolen and they have already sold it.


Kind regards,

Libra Carr.

Hi,


Just a note that if the person taking the photo is a burgler, he may have a crowbar or other implement to hand, this would then bring your own safety into question and becomes confrontational.


We have a good Police force and we have a council that have direct access to the DVLA give them your information and do not get involved, let them make the enquiry via the registered keeper.


Kind regards,

Libra Carr.

I don't really think that prospective burglars are going to turn up in a van, wearing reflective jackets and drawing a lot of attention to themselves! Why on earth would they take pictures? Unless you're living in a mansion with a sophisticated alarm system that needs getting past.

Bit of paranoia here I would say.

As someone pointed out, pictures are taken of rubbish left out in case any prosecution is required for dumping. Perhaps that is the case here, council departments not talking to each other - wouldn't be unheard of.

Steady Eddy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is not a crime to take photos that must be

> realised, but when you look at the circumstances

> as a whole, in this case, then this has to be

> questioned what the actual purpose was. It is also

> the right of the owner to have a say in who takes

> photos of their property, therefore it works both

> ways of the freedom to have a say and how someone

> feels.

>

> I am a non-professional photographer that does it

> as a hobby and love some of the building

> architecture, so I would point out, as my personal

> opinion that in this case it does not show to be

> for arcitectual art purposes.


That may be so but a few weeks ago on a thread about someone taking pictures of peoples' children many on here took a very different line..."don't be so precious about your sprogs", being the main one, where are they now when it's property?

Scene:


Burglars driving down the road, stopped by cops


Cop 1: hello my lad, can I ask where you are going?

Stripy Shirt 1: just collecting scrap guv?nor!

Cop 2: Mind if I look in the cab?

Stripy Shirt 2: (starting to sweat on upper lip) Err, no, what for?

Cop 2: What's this digital camera for then?

Stripy Shirt 2: Ain't mine!

Cop 2: Is it yours? (Points accusingly at Stripy Shirt 1)

Stripy Shirt 1: Yes it's mine.

Cop 2: Mind if I look at the smudges?

Stripy Shirt 1: If you must.

Cop 2: why so many pictures of houses on Underhill Road?

Stripy Shirt 1: (slight stammer) er, I?m, a student of Victorian vernacular architecture ... and it's for my MA

Cop 1: C'mon lads, you're nicked!

Stripy Shirt 2: What for?!

Cop 1: Going equipped to steal.


Think that?s how it works, would stand corrected by any legal out there

Eccentric

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Fair points, not arguing with you on them.  What people forget is that immigrants or low skilled workers do the jobs the home population don't want to do and without those jobs being done, things very quickly grind to a halt, i.e. hospital cleaners, all very necessary, but I'd have thought the majority are on minimum wage. And Minimum Wage (35hrs/wk) isn't exactly what I'd call minimum. Just over £21K, easily double and a bit more than what I get in monthly pension income to live off.
    • Well he couldn’t deliver anything better than a poor brexit. Because no such thing exists 
    • Fair points jazzer. But it begs the question, on what information are people basing their opinion? because if it’s x or the right wing media the of course they will believe nothing has happened but people who claim to be motivated by rising immigration numbers are either ignorant of or don’t care the those numbers have dropped significantly since Labour got in Hospital waiting lists are finally showing improvements after years of getting worse people on minimum wage are better off We haven’t had a random general election or new prime minister just months after the last one  compare that to Tory chaos Important relations with other countries (important for long term trade and growth) have improved under labour given the size of the mess they inherited it’s far better than many give credit for  and the prospect of a Badenoch and/or farage govt returning us to the chaos of last 10 years? No thanks (I could do a long list of things Labour have done wrong or badly but that’s for another thread. I did not vote for Labour, but all things considered they are a massive improvement on what came before. Unfortunately we have a bunch of far right agitators kicking off around the country because they are cry babies which gives impression country is going downhill  when it’s really not)  
    • he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...