Jump to content

Christening advice please


sb

Recommended Posts

Had my daughter baptised earlier this year CoE at St Giles in Camberwell and the stipulations were the same as those outlined by Trinity - we are outside the boundaries but they were happy to book us in for the christening after a couple of months attendance (this was not stipulated by them, my choice to attend to get a sense of the church having no experience of CoE). I found them very welcoming and the fact that we are unmarried was never brought up as I feared it would be in a catholic church (I was brought up catholic). Still attending and quite enjoy it - its a really friendly church.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The position of the Catholic Church and the CoE are quite different. Because it is the "established church" the C of E is obliged to do weddings, baptisms etc. for anyone living within the parish. They also will often do a "Ceremony of thanksgiving" for lukewarm believers who want a nice "hello baby" type of event. I've been to a few of these and they've been lovely events that were right for the families in question.


When a baby is baptised in the Catholic faith the parents and God parents are taking on a responsibility to bring the child up as a Catholic -- this means weekly church attendance, and adherence to Catholic belief. At least one of the God parents has to be a Catholic in good standing. It's not a naming ceremony as is often believed, but a sacrament in which the child is reborn in Christ and becomes a member of the body of the Church. Clearly, if you're not a believer this isn't for you!


Asking about Church attendance is a shortcut to finding out if you're actually a practising Catholic: Catholics are obliged to attend Mass at least weekly, and seek absolution and receive Holy Communion at least once a year. It's pretty straightforward - it's a choice, you're either in or you're out. I can't really understand why anyone who isn't a Catholic would want to make promises they won't be able to keep and profess things in which they don't believe. It's also rather disrespectful to want a sacrament in which they have no belief, but I suspect that most non-church-goers asking for Catholic baptisms do not realise this.


On the other hand, if you really wish for your child to be baptised as a Catholic then by all means join the parish: you will be welcomed. Many people find that having children makes them think about their faith again, ask themselves some of the big questions, try going back to church and find that it's a good thing for them and their family. St. Thomas More is a friendly and busy parish, filled with young families (and no, they aren't just there for the school -- many are at local non-Catholic state or independent schools, others home educate, etc.). It's a great and varied parish community. Even the daily Mass is busy - from young mums to older couples, there's at least 50+ every morning at 9:30. For those interested - there's tea and coffee after the 9am and 10:30 Sunday Masses which is a good way to meet others.


For parents who want a loosely Christian ceremony of thanksgiving, welcome and naming, the C of E Ceremony of Thanksgiving seems to make a lot more sense, won't offend anyone, won't require any changes of belief or lifestyle, and will probably be more to most people's liking if they're not church attenders already.


Different strokes for different folks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I tried to engage one Dulwich by email.  They sent me a lot of flannel but were not prepared to discuss things.  I clearly will not be joining.  I support groups  that campaign to improve the environment, our health and well being etc not single issue groups who want to maintain the status quo.  
    • You have to spend time in the area, only you know what feels right for you. You will then probably have more specific questions to ask which will be easier to answer.
    • I've known of this forum for a while, and given its very active and obviously contains a lot of locals I thought this would be a good place to ask... I have a dilemma and I could find some old thread from '14, but obviously in a decade much has changed with all of these areas (maybe the village less so) - so some background I'll supply, and I'd love to know what folks think on the area that will suit best based on below situation and wants/needs Us Mid/late 30's have lived nearer to Clapham/Brixton for many years - current house large enough but small garden, and Brixton area not great for kids plus long school commute A young kid starting school in the not too distant future (school slap bang in the middle of all the Dulwich's (not state, so without naming it, you get the idea of location) Work remote mostly around St Pauls a few days (both parents) so half decent links to that area of London good  Requirements Access out of London to the SW/W required occasionally by car, don't know anyone further East/South really Want a larger garden for kid/us - ideally semi detached house at the least and nothing smaller than what we have (which rules out most of ED apart from Upland/Friern type houses) Things locally to do with kids (soft play/fun park/cinema etc) and also a few handy shops (Rosendale Road/Park Hall Road would likely cover most little things) Nice and relatively safe neighbourhood feel - currently most of our street are 20 something sharers who aren't able to work out how the wheeliebins work/Brixton nutters roam about here Not too loud, there is a lot of noise where we are now, and its not what I want next time - so away from main road/bus route ideally. Ideally a walk to school or very short car/bike/scooter ride weather permitting it is one of the well known Dulwich schools  My take on things - please correct me/add to this, as I am not a local! Budget is up to around £2m, and in ED to get the same size house (circa 1800 sqft 4/5 bed) I'd probably end up quite a way from things, either on Upland/Friern or the bottom of Peck Rye for example I've seen some houses, seems a bit remote - most of the houses with good access to Lordship are quite small. Houses in the Village are either too expensive or are going to be the same as what I have now albeit with a better garden, but decent neighbourhood feel/access to park/local shops and things etc I feel is peak here of all areas - its nice and quiet - transport is a bit pants mind you Houses in WD seem to be larger in size, have nice sized gardens, depending how close I can get to WD station, the school is very close, there are 3 stations that would work well, and there is a small selection of local shops, feels OK neighbourhood wise? Nearer Norwood end I worry of all the things I dislike about being near Brixton, but maybe that is unfounded.   On balance I think trying to buy something around Rosendale road shops in either direction a couple hundred meters is likely going to offer the best house, best transport options, and meet my criteria with quieter life and being best for the school. But it isn't close to any of the parks really, and is it a bit dull if I get sick of The Rosendale? Dulwich Village I suspect is the best all round option but transport isn't great and obviously its the most expensive, and the LTN on Court Lane makes living in the roads there (which is likely all I could afford) and trying to get out SW a pain as you have to go all the way around. I like Lordship lane the most as a place for 'stuff' (although not sure these days if its that child compatible with loads of young people?), but house wise I'd likely end up too far from anything interesting as anything within a short walk of LL is pretty small and they don't have decent sized gardens. Any opinions welcome and encouraged as short of spending bloody ages online I only know what I know from my handful of visits to either location over the years.
    • You might possibly consider that the the degree of scepticism and suspicion your original post encountered was largely due to the accusatory nature of the title in which you specifically identified a long-standing and respected local business. You also sensationalised the matter by using the words "poisoning" and  "twice!" in the heading.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...