Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Absolutely FredCasa. In more than 20 posts above, you are the only one that has referred to the massive ideologically driven upheaval the NHS has been undergoing since 2012. We are now beginning to experience the fall out.

I have been with the FHGP for 30 years, and have only very recently had difficulties similar to those mentioned.

I went to the meeting last night, and all these grievances were discussed, with positive outcomes. Look out for the minutes on the website in due course, and please consider attending the meetings in future.

The predominant reason for the 'drop in ratings' (very trip Advisor) is recruitment. Not in small part due to massive workload. When the previous manager left in January to take up another position, it took until late this year before a non-temporary manager was appointed.Similarly it is very difficult to recruit GPs. And here we are back to the 2012 act, NHS England et al.

My son is registered there and I have had a mixed experience. The clinical staff are great, the midwifery team superb and on the whole the practice staff are ok. They've always been accommodating when it comes to booking an appointment but there is certainly room for improvement. One example was taking my little one in as a one year old and having to wait for over an hour as the reception staff had forgotten to let the practice nurse know we had arrived.


I understand that there are thousands of contributing factors to the difficulties faced by GPs. Not least that the NHS simply doesnt have the capacity to truly be a health service. It's become an illness treatment service.


Having spent a fair amount of time working in the NHS over the last year, I can also say that I've been surprised by my experience of GP focus being so heavily weighted toward renumeration and financial incentive as opposed to patient care. I won't say that's the case everywhere as that would be unfair but from what I've seen in one specific borough it certainly caught me off guard.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...