Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I had a conversation with a serving member of the Kent Fire Brigade this afternoon and he reliably informed me that if you wanted to off someone then the best way to do it without drawing suspicion to yourself is to go to their place and get them pissed. Wait until they've passed out through excessive alcohol consumption and then stage a chip-pan fire.


The investigating authorities will naturally conclude that the victim got trashed and fancied a bite to eat but unfortunatly passed out before the snack became volatile and burnt them and their belongings to a crisp.


Jobsagoodun.

Oh come on, this thread isn't too bad, I've had this conversation in the pub before, after a few beers.


I once met a bloke who told me (when quite drunk), that he wanted to be a hit man, and had the idea of burying his victims up to their waist, then running over them with a steamroller.


I suspect he'll never do it, it was just one of those random conversations you have in the pub.

Seems a bit too labour intensive to me - what with peeling all those spuds etc and what if the frazzled victim had McCain oven bake chips in the freezer?


Nah, bigbadwolf, sounds like 'pub talk' to me after a good session in the Capitol


Far better to treat them to a slap up meal at Heston Blumenthal's The Fat Duck with oysters as a starter.

Ah, but silverfox... you can get frozen chips which are ready to deep-fry. And (I imagine) they react in a particularly volatile fashion when they initially hit the oil. That would be the way to go.


The problem would be making sure nobody finds out you'd been round their house.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...