Jump to content

Recommended Posts

According to FOI investigation in Mail today this is the pay of our top council employees


?198,295 E Kelly Chief Executive

?169,906 Dr R Wallis Director of Public Health

?162,489 D Whitfield Strategic Director of Finance and Corporate Services

?155,945 G Scott Strategic Director of Housing and Community Services

?154,171 D Collins Strategic Director of Environment and Leisure


So the person in charge of Environment and Leisure at Southwark Council is paid more than the PM. Hmmm....

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/82340-southwark-council-pay/
Share on other sites

Deborah Collins - the invisible woman. She has never responded to any emails sent to her and gives the impression she is detached from her area of responsibility. Worrying, as at this level, she is advising the politicians and presumably cannot have a close grasp of the very real level of complaints coming through to, in my experience, poorly managed call centre staff.
I can't find the article I was reading the other day, but if I remember correctly it stated that on average, across the country, roughly 20% of council tax goes towards funding local council pensions. It's not just the headline salaries that are large, its also the defined benefit schemes in the background.
Southwark has a annual turnover of 300m which would put it in the medium-sized business category if you were looking for a private sector comparison. So yes 200k for CEO is a bit toppy looking at industry averages. Plus private sector execs have far more scrutiny on performance which is the bigger problem in my view.

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why should private sector salaries be higher? I

> would prefer it if my public services were run by

> the best minds and leaders, not the rejects.



Because public service is an end in itself.

Also, the rational in the past, was lower than private sector salary, with very good work/life balance and retirement benefits. But this has morphed into very good salary, very good work/life balance, and extremely good retirement benefits that now generally far exceed those of the private sector. With an estimated 20% of council tax going towards finding final salary pensions (and that's expected to increase dramatically as the pension funding liabilities become larger and larger), I'm not happy to be funding this level of remuneration.

This article from a couple of years ago has a list of all the London boroughs and what the Chief Execs were on.


http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/the-council-chiefs-on-more-than-200000-in-salary-and-perks-8547953.html


And Southwark was far from the worst.


Barking, Stella Manzie - ?179,250

Barnet, Nick Walkley - ?250,818

Bexley, Will Tuckley - ?244,897

Brent, Gareth Daniel - ?231,853

Bromley, Doug Patterson - ?202,295

Camden, Mike Cooke - ?172,463*

Croydon, Jon Rouse - ?221,180

Ealing, Martin Smith - ?176,908

Enfield, Rob Leak - ?226,761

Greenwich, Mary Ney - ?225,510

Hackney, Tim Shields - ?207,083

H&F/K&C, Derek Myers - ?266,991 (but then I guess they can afford it)

Haringey, Kevin Crompton - ?249,452

Harrow, Michael Lockwood - ?227,274

Havering, Cheryl Coppell - ?195,912

Hillingdon, Hugh Dunnachie - ?187,069

Hounslow, Mary Harpley - ?203,026

Islington, Lesley Seary - ?160,000

Kingston, Bruce Mcdonald - ?224,000

Lambeth, Derrick Anderson - ?229,290

Lewisham, Barry Quick - ?144,531*

Merton, Ged Curran - ?211,785

Newham, Kim Bromley-Derry - ?237,315

Redbridge, Roger Hampson - ?231,099

Richmond, Gillian Norton - ?219,444

Southwark, Annie Shepperd - ?170,310

Sutton, Niall Bolger - ?189,777

Tower Hamlets ,Aman Dalvi - ?104,015 **

Waltham, Forest Martin Esom - ?223,473

Wandsworth, Paul Martin - ?254,880

Westminster, Mike More - ?234,407

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I was not suggesting anything else!   I'm not sure how you interpret what I said  as "irrelevant"? I was responding to a post saying that Corbyn was "unelectable". My point was that a  large number  of the electorate  voted for him!
    • that's exactly what happened - Brickhouse were forced to close due to rent hike and then Gail's didn't move in until covid restrictions lifted and normality resumed. Gail's would have opened much sooner as they were lined up and able to offer the landlord much higher rents. Brickhouse was a local favourite
    • The Brickhouse closed just before Covid December 2019. Nothing to do with Gails muscling in as they didn't move into till December 2022. Stop trying to fit a false narrative into a story
    • Very specific I know! For our daughter who has just finished Year I2. There are many tutors advertising but would really like recommendations. I was going to post on the Tutoring sub board but there appears to be very little traffic there. Feel free to call or text 07342 059948  Many thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...