Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I assume its private money because the logo is primarily a tool for making money and the olympics are only part funded by public money.


The olympic "brand" is heavily policed - that is, you can't just take advantage of the fact that you're a London business and start selling "lovely olympic pies", for example.


Everything that has a commercial potential around the olympics brand is controlled because it can be sold. Companies are licensed to use the logo in the same way companies are licensed to use Harry Potter or kids tv characters. Its a very big part of generating money to pay for the "thing" itself.

Having just sat through a LOCOG branding presentatiopn I can now see where they're going and I'm impressed, although I'm still not keen on the logo emblem. As someone said on the news last night it was a mistake to just release the emblem on it's own, not their full branding which has loads of potential and is actually quite exciting in it's possiblities.

I've held back on the whole logo debate as these things can often take time to sink in - and an astonishing bandwagon formed to condemn it which made me think it might be ok after all


Given the context (ie the logo design only - forget about the politics and debate about the wider Olympian ideals) I think it's alright. The fact that it has been so adaptable to so many who claim to despise it and can tailor it accordingly suggests that from a design perspective it's pretty neat


The other thing in it's favour is any comparison with other Olympic logos - most of them are pretty hideous. The Sydney one in particular is still poor after all this time


There was a 2 page pull out in the Guardian of all of the past logos which I can't find online but the official IOC page shows some horrors


The "original" London logo which everyone claims to prefer looks very.... bland and dull . IMO

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Well according to a newspaper article, Gail’s is opening 10 shops in London,,, yup Dulwich is named 10/5 I seem to recall with others in London opening at 7 am…!, Guess that is to capture workers coming off all night shift. Offering free mince pies until they run out.. So very sad to hear about Romeo Jones… been a customer since the opening, any idea where Patrick has gone or details… please pm me.    What is going to be in its place…. Will be around in Jan…umm village is changing….
    • interesting the police said "the car was in demand at the moment" what make/model is that?
    • Just be careful to know exactly what they cover and the limits. i use Many Pets and Medivet, as I think one of the vets is exceptionally good. Some of the NHV are, but I’ve had a couple I’ve not liked at all.  I need consistency and to feel that they actually care more about the animals than the money.  
    • I haven't used them myself but I noticed recently that "Snoots" in Forest Hill is going unlimited primary care for £33/month, so basically a subscription. Easy access on the 176 from East Dulwich. I have no idea what it includes so read the contract! It's a chain but only 5 branches so not a mega corporate. 🤷‍♂️ https://www.snootsvet.com/find-us
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...