Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I assume its private money because the logo is primarily a tool for making money and the olympics are only part funded by public money.


The olympic "brand" is heavily policed - that is, you can't just take advantage of the fact that you're a London business and start selling "lovely olympic pies", for example.


Everything that has a commercial potential around the olympics brand is controlled because it can be sold. Companies are licensed to use the logo in the same way companies are licensed to use Harry Potter or kids tv characters. Its a very big part of generating money to pay for the "thing" itself.

Having just sat through a LOCOG branding presentatiopn I can now see where they're going and I'm impressed, although I'm still not keen on the logo emblem. As someone said on the news last night it was a mistake to just release the emblem on it's own, not their full branding which has loads of potential and is actually quite exciting in it's possiblities.

I've held back on the whole logo debate as these things can often take time to sink in - and an astonishing bandwagon formed to condemn it which made me think it might be ok after all


Given the context (ie the logo design only - forget about the politics and debate about the wider Olympian ideals) I think it's alright. The fact that it has been so adaptable to so many who claim to despise it and can tailor it accordingly suggests that from a design perspective it's pretty neat


The other thing in it's favour is any comparison with other Olympic logos - most of them are pretty hideous. The Sydney one in particular is still poor after all this time


There was a 2 page pull out in the Guardian of all of the past logos which I can't find online but the official IOC page shows some horrors


The "original" London logo which everyone claims to prefer looks very.... bland and dull . IMO

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They've left all kinds of things in my garden including gardening gloves and shoes, not to mention scavenged food and packaging. Once they left an unopened vacuum pack of smoked trout, the next day some pita bread. All a bit biblical.
    • From memory foxes only became a regular sight in the 90s, the attached article says they first appeared in the 30s becoming far more common in the 80s.  Apparently, whilst we think that urban foxes live longer than rural due to their 'easy' life few will make it over the age of two.  In towns they are far more crowded than their natural habitat where they are more territorial. I've never seen foxes and cats fighting but once saw two cats squaring up to each other and a watching fox went up and butted its head against one of the cats.  There's a video on youtube of a cat and fox facing off when the cat is eating outside, but it wont let me embed on this post.  Get too close and I'll scratch you. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/15/urban-foxes-are-they-fantastic-or-a-growing-menace My main issue is leaving things out like gardening gloves and they go or are shredded.  One stole a bag of bird food in front of me, took it next door, shredded the bag and then left it.  
    • I was trying to remember when Franklins moved to Lordship Lane from Walworth Road where it was combined with an antique/bric a brac shop. Mid 1990s, first wave ED gentrification?
    • Hello, I lost a babies blanket between Tessa Jowell and the Picture House on Lordship Lane 😞It is teal colour with the name Cillian embroidered on it.  If anyone sees/finds it please let me know.  Thank you! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...