Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Steve Ive no idea what I would do. Did this happen to you in Peckham Rye? That is terrifying.

Are there attacks like this going on in Peckham Rye that would warrant these muzzles and enclosures on normal dog walking people?

are dogs attacking human beings on a regular basis?


Its a pretty regular dog walking crowd in PRP and we tend to keep an eye out for eachother and keep an ear to the grapevine.


I thought original posters were complaining about being rushed by disobedient dogs rather than attacked by vicious ones .Hence my advice to ignore if you are phobic, so as not to increase interest and interaction .


No collar no owner? that is illegal straight away, so would such a dog ever be muzzled or 'walked in an enclosure'?

Dogs this dangerous have no business being in a park at all, and no muzzle or enclosure is going to make them safe.



Dogs scare me when they are off the lead in the residential streets- off lead dogs in the streets are illegal and yet I see guys cycling along with dogs running on the pavement. Not only intimidating and illegal, but dangerous re possible RTA. I expect to be able to walk my dog on a lead down the street without being harrassed by an off lead dog- the most likely scenario for a fight or for me to get bitten


edited to add:

the law already requires the muzzling and neutering of all pit bull type or dangerous breed dogs-and of course for all dogs to wear a collar.

This thread is becoming increasingly hysterical (on more than one level).


The VAST MAJORITY of dogs we see in our parks are well looked after, have sensible owners, are not 'trophy' dogs, and are completely harmless. The chance of being attacked - even by the remaining minority - is pretty minimal. To be scared of every dog that we come across in the park is irrational. To then pass on this irrationality to children is quite sad; personally I find it a shame for children not be encouraged to like and understand animals. To be scared of animals is to miss out on so much.


I walk in Peckham Rye, Dulwich and other parks most days with my small children - and feel completely safe. If anything I feel more wary about the cyclists zipping around the park - but I certainly wouldn't go around thumping a drum that we should have separate areas for those on two wheels to protect me and my kids.


The park is for everyone - dog or non-owners. Yes - there are irresponsible dog owners - but be reassured that they are a tiny minority. Live and let live for goodness sake - and perhaps we can all enjoy a walk in the park.

Huggers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ditto



me too, well said:) There are already enough areas in Peckham Rye park where dogs either aren't aloud or are to be kept on a lead. My dogs are no threat to anybody and I would not want to be stuck in one area of a park where dogs are allowed off lead, and muzzle them when they come out of that area!! Why should I? They are teensy and have NEVER shown any aggresion to anyone, don't tar responsible dog owners with the same brush as the irresponsilbe ones:X


I pay my taxes and my dogs are very well behaved, I want to walk around the park, where I want to go, not be told where I can let them off, in a "DOG AREA" Forget it!

cloudnine Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > I walk in Peckham Rye, Dulwich and other parks

> most days with my small children - and feel

> completely safe. If anything I feel more wary

> about the cyclists zipping around the park - but

> I certainly wouldn't go around thumping a drum

> that we should have separate areas for those on

> two wheels to protect me and my kids.

>

> The park is for everyone - dog or non-owners. Yes

> - there are irresponsible dog owners - but be

> reassured that they are a tiny minority. Live and

> let live for goodness sake - and perhaps we can

> all enjoy a walk in the park.


Very well said. I have dogs myself which would be more likely to lick you to death than attack you, but I wholely recognise that my love of animals isn't shared by all and do my very best to train them and keep them on the lead when they may be a nuisance to others....and walk elsewhere like the woods when it's busy. People do have the right to run round the park without dogs tearing after them which as someone said is usually the excitement of a young dog rather than aggression....but it doesn't matter....it shouldn't happen. But I do agree that this care of each other has to be reciprocated by all groups....on many occasions either I or my dogs have narrowly missed injury from cyclists who speed round the park without any due care for pedestrians. Or the summer inevitable spate of mopeds no doubt stolen being driven round by kids with no helmets. Oh dear, maybe I should start a rant thread!

I have 2 dogs that I walk regularly on both the Rye and in Dulwich Park. I have to admit that the Harris girls who have kicked both me and my dogs (who are always under control at all times) as we have walked home, are more scary to me than any dog off a lead. I have also had mad cyclists in Dulwich Park crash into my dog and hurl abuse at me as we have walked around the park.
yes, the harris girls do seem particularly hysterical when it comes to dogs, my little mutt has been terrified by them screaming at/because of him, on more than one occassion...always on the lead I might add. first mate, I hope you ordered them out of the park on the grounds that screaming teenage girls are the very worst of the species...

curlykaren,


I was sufficiently startled by the vitriol that came my way, for no good reason I may add, that I spoke to the relevant authorities about it. I was taken aback that a group of girls should be so rude and overbearing and saddened that en masse they seemed to have a real hatred of dogs. I think it is doubtful that the whole lot of them have been attacked by dogs so can only conclude that they have learned the dislike. I too see more and more children who run and scream at the mere sight of a dog, not only in the park but in the street, where the dog is clearly on a lead- I note that the accompanying adult often seems to share the child's dislike.

I saw something strangley annoying this morning. Some great oaf, and his nasty terrior chasing Squirels in the park. Now, i know there are two many grey squirels in this world, but..... this idiot of a man was actually holding back his dog, antaganizing it, then releasing so he could chase and almost slaughter the squirel.


What the hell is going on? CHILDREN play in the park, you start teaching your dog to kill... surely something bad could happen!


Prick

davidC Wrote:- this idiot of a man was actually holding back his dog, antaganizing it, then releasing so he could chase and almost slaughter the squirel.



It's part of the dog fighting training course for a gold digging pit-bull owner, gives the dog a taste for killing


and blood.

LegalE-ish wrote:-So restrict all dogs cos you got attacked once?


I do believe that if you read the press there have been many other attacks apart from the animal that attacked me. There was a case a few days ago where two Alsatians were fighting and when the owner tried to intervene, they turned on him and killed him.


In some countries dogs are not allowed on the streets without a muzzle. So why not here?

It certainly does the dog no harm and may save them from being harmed.

As I said in my original response, I was looking for food for thought about what I thought about dogs off leads in Peckham Rye.


So, here is where I am after all the great posts:


1) Peckham Rye is a shared resource - which we are all entitled to enjoy

2) To enjoy it we all need to understand where our rights begin and end

3) Dog owners totally have the right to walk their dogs on the Rye

4) If someone has a problem with dogs it is not up to dog owners to judge that person - it is totally within the rights of someone to expect to be able to walk around Peckham Rye without being approached by an unknown dog

5) If someone has a a dog under control it is totally their right to exercise their dog without being abused by people who may not like dogs

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...