Jump to content

Increasing grubbiness of Lordship Lane pavements!


m7post

Recommended Posts

This is an issue originally raised in the 'East Dulwich councillor - can I help?'

- but i wanted to put it out to a wider comment base - I hoping we can persuade the area office of the need for actually cleaning the increasing filthy pavements of Lordship Lane. It's becoming embarrassing how just dirty it is round here.

see below last reply to councillor James Barber.


Hi James, Thanks for your note. ( Re: East Dulwich councillor - can I help?)


Thanks for the info on funding - unfortunately I'm all to aware of how the system dose and doesn't work.


Back to the point though - the grubbiness of L.L..

The out each morning - they are not cleaning though are they - they're just picking up litter and alike.

The pavements really need cleaning - as mentioned - around all the bins, buss stops, take awakes, late night shops, fish stalls around the station - there is thick blackening grime - that then gets walked out across the pavements - rain will not wash this away - even if it would - surely we can not rely on the vagaries of the weather to determine whether we live in a clean environment - we need to clear and clean up after our selves.


Please could we have some action in changing the regime - so at least occasionally / fortnightly the pavements are washed/pressure washed in the most needy areas.


Please could come back to us with what can be done.


Thanks


Martin.

---------------

JBARBER Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi m7post,


>

>- every day including Sundays a dedicated

> team are out from 6.30am cleaning Lordship Lane.

> I'm sorry its grimmier. We need more rain to wash

> away stains and spills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you think lordship lane is bad, come have a look at Peckham Rye, its absoluting disgusting, especially outside the butcher / fish shops where they dump and drain the rapidly unfreezing produce.


im surprized health and safety doesnt close the whole st down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't there a time (and I could be imagining this from too many films) where the pavement outside shops was the shops responsibility rather than the councils?


Even if I'm wrong I see the council as the last resort for this sort of thing - like a lazy adolescent, the more the council tidies our room, the more the public takes it for granted. Individuals and business should take more responsibility and be punished more harshly for not doing so IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree with Big Phil.

Am in constant communication with Southwark re state of Highshore Rd ,near Post Office sorting office . ( in Peckham )

And thanks to Samuel Ofosuhene ( the guy who's arranging the current street audit around Forest Hill Rd etc ) with some success.


But all that money spent on repaving Crystal Palace Rd ,and now Court Lane ,plus the fancy cross overs to the side roads joining Lordship Lane.

How on earth does Southwark prioritise this type of spending ?

Is it all zoned ? " Oh we've not spent much money in East Dulwich ,let's do it now whether it needs it or not ?"

" Oh,let's keep the good burghers of Court Lane happy and further improve their already immaculate pavements ? "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it would be great if the businesses that supply the rubbish i.e. the take aways, late night shops etc and those that supply the drunks i.e. the bars, would spend 5 minutes every now and then in the evening cleaning up the rubbish left by their customers. Just send someone up and down the road to have a bit of a tidy up, it would be great to show they had pride in the area and contribute to keeping it clean.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wasn't there a time (and I could be imagining this

> from too many films) where the pavement outside

> shops was the shops responsibility rather than the

> councils?

>

> Even if I'm wrong I see the council as the last

> resort for this sort of thing - like a lazy

> adolescent, the more the council tidies our room,

> the more the public takes it for granted.

> Individuals and business should take more

> responsibility and be punished more harshly for

> not doing so IMO


Equally, SM, the more people do the Council's job for it, the less incentive there is for the Council to pull its finger out and fulfill its legal duty (assuming of course it IS the Council's duty). If everyone brushes doen their steps then Council inspectors could come along, inspect it, observe "it all looks fine to me" and de-prioritise any further cleaning. And what happens to those street areas that are not directly outside a shopfront? Who takes responsibility for that?


I applaud your call to public spititedness and there is little as encouraging as seeing a proud shop owner taking a brush and bucket of water to the pavement outside their shop but is that really the way forward long-term?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Mr Barber - Please do keep us updated on future plans that hopefully this 'Assembly Question' will result in. Let's hope we can have a clean centre to out community - if we can't achieve that as a council / community, what can we, it's a basic really isn't it.


Regards,

Martin.

------------

JBARBER Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi m7post,

> Its the chewing gum that really annoys me.

> Agree we need occassional deep clean of grime that

> litter picking, manual sweeping and rain just

> doesn't seem to shift.

>

> I'll ask a question at full council assembly to

> get a definitive answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Do you know, I think it might just be. It's not

> unheard of is it? And it would be A Good Thing? So

> no matter how many obstacles you see in the way

> (and I probably agree with you on most of them) I

> would rather see the challenge head on instead of

> shrugging and saying it can't be done


Will we see an according reduction in Council Tax bills as we would be doing the Council's job for it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Domitianus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Will we see an according reduction in Council Tax

> bills as we would be doing the Council's job for

> it?


Sounds rather like the little girls saying "My dad says it gives people jobs" in the anti-litter adverts from the 70's/80's. Do you throw litter in the street because someone in the council has a job to clear it up? Of course you don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I run the shop under the dulwich Cafe and not a saturday goes by when I dont have something exceptionally nasty to clean up. Sometimes its let over chicken bones, chips, cigarette packs, other times its worse.

With the location of the shop being in the basement, it is difficult enough to get people to venture down into the unknown, we do our best to keep it clean.

Its OK the council wardens being about during the day, however they need to address LL during the evenings. There are often groups of people lurking around.


Have you been down the stairs to see us yet?

Where you worried about what you might find lurking about?

Well fear not. You may be surprised.


E


www.fortaroma.co.uk

We are under the dulwich Cafe

Lordship Lane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "If I hear 'my father was a tool maker' / my wife's a nurse / my father was a GP one more time... as if any of those things qualify anyone to fix / understand anything. "   yeah but that's not the point here - many (most?) of the people watching last night are the voters who tend not to pay much attention to Westminster and may well buy the "they are all the same - born into money and detached from real life" - so Starmer's story, as overplayed as it is to you and me will be news to many
    • It was an absolute shit show. And so much anger coming from both sides, not becoming at all (was surprised how riled cool Rishi was getting).  Agree about the format, it was lazy, whatsherchops wasn't asking pertinent questions, she was just going for binary yesses or nos. The producers didn't force either side to drill down on anything, just make commitments so they got good soundbites.  If I hear 'my father was a tool maker' / my wife's a nurse / my father was a GP one more time... as if any of those things qualify anyone to fix / understand anything. 
    • Good.  Subsidence claims generally have an excess of £1000 per claim, but was yours higher?
    • Indeed, many house here have had or will have subsidence issues so one needs to bear that in mind.  Many houses here have shallow foundations but they have been around 100 years or so without too much issue. What the surveyor has told you doesn't feel like a 'red flag', more of a sensible warning.  Bear in mind that although the surveyor is nominally working for you, their focus iln reality is mostly on the lender and the risk of being sued, either by them or you.  So they are always pretty cautious.  It would be wise to get a 2nd opinion, eg. from a structural engineer.  Or talk  to the original surveyor directly as they may say more than they are prepared to put in a report.  It's a little difficult from the description to identify what the situation is but the scenario in which part of a property has been underpinned and the rest has not is fairly common here.  The proximity of trees is likely to be the main thing to be concerned about, particularly after the hot summer of 2002, as insurers generally regard them as risky, especially if they are not cut back from time to time.  A second surveyor can advise directly on this. It would definitely be worth trying to take over the current buildings insurance.  Indeed, it may be quite hard to find new cover.  Enquire what the current premium is and who the policy is ultiimately underwitten by (ie. is it a name that you have ever heard of?)  The insurance industry, in general, works to a guideline that the insurance of an underpinned property should transfer to a new owner.   https://www.biba.org.uk/insurance-guides/home-insurance-guides/subsidence/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...