Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi


So for some time I felt that this matter is slightly unfair. Basically if you work a 5 day week your annual holiday is worked out by 28 divided by 5 which gives the 5 day worker a total of 5.6 weeks holidays. The way the holiday is calculated for someone who works a 6 day week is 28 divided by 6 giving someone who works an extra 52 day's a year a total of 4.6 weeks which is less than a 5 day worker.


I would be interested to hear peoples feed back on this as I think it is slightly unjust. I work a 6 day week and an average of 55 hrs a week which is quite a few hours more than the 48hr week.


Let me know what you think and for those who support this I have done an online petition to the government to look into it. so if you can sign and share that would be greatly appreciated.


https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/110899


Also any advice is most welcome.


Regards


Chris

I don't understand your calculation. Does everyone get 28 days but you are saying it unfair because it proportionally less time off relative to days worked? Or, are you saying that people on a 5 day week actually get more absolute (total number of) days off?

You're entitled to an extra 8 days holiday a year if your job requires you to work bank holidays. Thus if you have a 20 day allocation it becomes 28 days. I think he means people who 5 days get more time off relative to hours worked.


Frankly I don't have a lot of sympathy with the OP. I work at least 55 hours a week in a five day a week job that includes bank holidays, evenings and weekends, and I think the 28 days holiday is pretty good. I've been with my job long enough now that I actually get more than that, but 5.6 weeks a year is, IMO, pretty decent.


If you aren't happy with it then is there any reason why you are unable to change job or renegotiate your position? The simple fact is most people don't work a six day schedule; if you feel you're a special case then you need to take that to your boss, but I doubt that the govt is going to be interested.

I'm not really sure what to make of this. Surely, you are compensated for the extra day / hours through your pay package. I also technically work a 5 day a week job and put in 55+ hours with a fair amount of regularity. Time off for me is 25 days plus bank holidays. I know plenty of people with 20 days in the UK. My colleagues in the US get a max of 20 days with seniority and my colleagues in France get 30. My husband gets 32 plus bank holidays in the UK.


Its just all part of the job market and total package you are negotiating. Do you only make proportionally more money than your 5 day a week colleagues?


Good luck with your negotiations but I agree with others that the government isn't going to intervene in private sector pay package negotiations like the way you are asking.

I think there has been some confusion here. The OP isn't talking about private negotiations. This relates to the statutory entitlement which is 5.6 weeks per year which equals 28 days based on a five day week. Bank holidays are included. The legislation expressly sets out that there shall be no proportional increase in the number of days paid holiday for those working 6 days.


I suspect that when the legislation was written it was assumed that the majority of 6th day working was overtime ie that you can choose to simply not work the 6th without penalty, thereby only needing 'holiday' on 5 days to provide a whole week off.

What the OP is asking is that if the 6th day is part of the standard week, then the 5.6 weeks entitlement should include the extra day.

AbDabs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think there has been some confusion here. The OP

> isn't talking about private negotiations. This

> relates to the statutory entitlement which is 5.6

> weeks per year which equals 28 days based on a

> five day week. Bank holidays are included. The

> legislation expressly sets out that there shall be

> no proportional increase in the number of days

> paid holiday for those working 6 days.

>

> I suspect that when the legislation was written it

> was assumed that the majority of 6th day working

> was overtime ie that you can choose to simply not

> work the 6th without penalty, thereby only needing

> 'holiday' on 5 days to provide a whole week off.

> What the OP is asking is that if the 6th day is

> part of the standard week, then the 5.6 weeks

> entitlement should include the extra day.


Well, no it IS private negotiations that are needed here - if you've agreed to work six days a week at the same holiday allocation that a five day rota would get then that's your problem. If you think you should have more holiday then take it up with your employer - the govt (rightly or wrongly and that's a different conversation) isn't going to be interested. The fact that the legislation is specific demonstrates that.


An employer isn't going to give you more than the law requires unless a) they want to incentivise/reward their staff or b) their staff persuade them to. Either way this explicitly is a situation that will only be resolved through private negotiation because I can't see any major party getting involved. Again, the moral dimension of that is a separate discussion.

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If

> you think you should have more holiday then take

> it up with your employer - the govt (rightly or

> wrongly and that's a different conversation) isn't

> going to be interested. The fact that the

> legislation is specific demonstrates that.

>

>

If you look at the OP's link to the petition it relates to the statutory entitlement not a particular individual/employment situation.


Mick Mac - the reason I refer to the 5.6 weeks is that the 28 days is calculated from the entitlement to 5.6 weeks within the legislation. This stems from the original 1 week in 13 from the Working time regulations which has since been enhanced

I think we all get that. However, people can and often are given more time off than the statutory minimum.


A 6 day work week with contracted hours of more than 40 is not standard. So for non-standard contracts, one would expect the terms to be negotiated and agreed specifically-- that includes all benefits and compensation. Creating guidelines for all contract elements for all non-standard working contracts isn't practical or necessary.


Its not like the statutory minimum is currently something that employers strictly adhere to as a max. It is something that employers extend as part of an incentive package for recruitment and therefore can be negotiated privately.

AbDabs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you look at the OP's link to the petition it

> relates to the statutory entitlement not a

> particular individual/employment situation.



Yes, agreed. And I repeat, the government have plainly already made it clear that they feel the situation is adequately legislated. They aren't going to revisit this anytime soon. People in the OPs position are free to take this up with their bosses - and I think they should - but expecting the govt to intervene is unrealistic.


FWIW I fully support anyone who works hard and feels they are worth more holiday, better wages etc. I don't think the OP is being unreasonable on wanting better T+C on their contract; but as things currently stand the law isn't with them on this. Personally I'm not sure what I think about this yet - I know a number of people who work six days but almost all are running their own business essentially. I would never ask someone to work those hours but don't object to others doing it so long as it's an informed choice made voluntarily. But I do feel if you do it you're responsible for making sure it's worth it. 28 days holiday is still a decent amount.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You get 28 days holiday per year - that's whether

> you work 5 days or 6 days a week.

>

> why convert the holiday to number of weeks off -

> this just confuses things


I suppose if you want to go off to Greece for 2 weeks you have to take

12 days instead of 10.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...