Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It was the end of the day for Key Stage 3 pupils but lesson change for Key Stage 4 pupils, who have a later finish on Thursdays than the younger pupils.


I agree no school is 100% safe but they can constantly review procedures and implement new measures across the whole spectrum of their remit and share any positive recommendations with their peer school communities with a view to making all safer.

Hopefully the learnings will be available to all schools. This awful event can happen anywhere (there was a terrible incident at a middle class Scottish school just a few months ago). Our young people are not immune to these terrible things where ever they go to school. Yes protect our school students but also teach them from a young age in order to prevent them thinking that "tooling up" is not a way for them to "protect" themselves. I dearly hope that the victims recover.

"The basic problem is that the little scumbag who did it will only get a slap on the wrist from the soppy judicial system. No deterrent or punishment. Ridiculous. The Bleeding Hearts have been running the asylum for too long"


It was only a matter of time before we had a genuinely insightful and expert view on what the "basic problem" is. Well done - the use of capitals for "Bleeding Hearts" is particularly persuasive.


PS elbow = arm joint, arse = bit for sitting on. Just in case you were unclear.

apbremer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The basic problem is that the little scumbag who

> did it will only get a slap on the wrist from the

> soppy judicial system. No deterrent or punishment.

> Ridiculous. The Bleeding Hearts have been running

> the asylum for too long.


Surely he's already remanded in custody - it's attempted murder.

This says so - until December 18th


http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/dulwich-stabbing-boy-15-cries-in-court-after-being-accused-of-attempted-murder-over-double-knife-a3120071.html


He cried.

"Wow - that last post was patronising - even by some EDF standards!"


Mea culpa.


If it is any consolation, I would have been equally scathing if someone had posted "the basic problem is that young people have no adequate means of self-expression; this would never have happened if more public money were available to support the exploration of teen identity crises through interpretive dance" - which is about as accurate.

apbremer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The basic problem is that the little scumbag who

> did it will only get a slap on the wrist from the

> soppy judicial system. No deterrent or punishment.


Do you think little 14 year old knife carrying "scumbags" spend a lot of time analysing sentences handed down by Magistrates Courts? Do you think they're very susceptible to the deterrent effect of sentencing?


What recent sentences for knife crime are you aware of? (No after the fact internet searching allowed).

apbremer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The basic problem is that the little scumbag who

> did it will only get a slap on the wrist from the

> soppy judicial system. No deterrent or punishment.

> Ridiculous. The Bleeding Hearts have been running

> the asylum for too long.


- Nope, not worth it.


(Original post deleted. Edited because I can't be bothered to argue with idiocy like this.)

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He won't get a slap on the wrist for this crime

> though. That's a myth. Violent crime has

> consequences whatever the age. It's for crimes

> like burglary that teenagers get non custodial

> punishment.


Doing it in a school is an aggravating factor too IMHO.


He'll be named somewhere down the line too (Judge will allow it).

Yes, actually stabbing someone on school premises is very serious. At least one school I have worked in would NEVER involve the police in incidents involving stealing, drugs, and possession of weapons because the head believed that the school was the only place of safety for some of the pupils, from ALL of the outside world.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...