Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's quite possible that if this young lad has masturbated in the park then he may have masturbated in his school and if that is the case his school, be it Charter or not, may already be trying to keep an eye on his behaviour. Extra information given to the school should surely be seen as useful and not over reacting. It's not as if the OP could give a name or really detailed description but the incident itself may be enough to help staff help the individual. Lets hope it was just a very unfortunate place for him to have chosen to do this.

Years ago I was the victim of an attack by a young man - he ran up behind me, pinned my arms down whilst on my back and tried to make me kiss him....I kept walking/stagger forward and managed to throw him off and then shouted and he ran away......this was at about 10am one very sunny October morning as I walked to college.....about 6 months later he was caught after an attempted rape. He had started out behaving much as the person you described Angel Delite, then gone on to braver and braver attacks, and by 21 had tried to rape someone.


I think anything we can do to try to identify this young man is a good thing. Even if it is just a childish prank, better to stop it right now.


Molly

I would say it is unlikely he was arousing himself looking at small children, he just was in the bushes at a place that he felt comfortable as perhaps he knows that area well.

I do feel there is a tinge of hysteria in the branding him a sexual deviant at the age of 13 for masturbating. Boys of that age will have a go as often as poss won't they, whenever the urge takes them?

He obviously should have been in school but perhaps he'd been at the doctors or something. He shows a bit of a lack of judgement in where he was but boys of that age don't really think do they.


Let's not have the child on the sex offenders register before we know the situation.


signed


Devil's advocate.

annaj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Give anyone a flash of her bits. Paula Radcliffe.

> Or at least I think that's what Moos meant.

> She squatted, as women do, which does give much

> flash.


Does or doesn't? Tell you what, let's all split hairs and pretend not to understand the point being made.

Well I think there's no harm in letting the possible school know. Molly made a very good point and I'm glad you are OK Molly. I think he's probaly just a boy going through a wanking phase but there is a very slim chance that his activities could escalate if he gets away with it.


Wasn't there a thread a couple of months ago about a boy in school uniform who flashed at a woman? Probably completely unrelated but I thought I'd mention it.

I guess the moral of this story is that we should all masturbate in the privacy of our own homes, or those of understanding friends.


Unless, of course, you are a breast-feeding mother in which case you are entitled to expose any part of your anatomy in any place you please and damn the offense to anyone else.

I had a very nice email back from the head of Charter. He wasn't in the slightest peeved that I had contacted him to let him know what had happened. The sense I got from the email was that all the schools in the borough pull together on issues such as this and that he would pass on the info. The community warden had not contacted him as of yet, so as this was the second incident I'm glad that I've been able to bring it to someone's attention who may be able to help.


No-one is labellling a 13 year old as a sexual deviant but it is unacceptable behaviour to masterbate in public, particularly around small children. I can tell you this, he knew exactly what he was doing, he wanted to be seen and he was not attempting to keep himself hidden in the thick of the bushes. Whatever his reasons he needs to stop.


Colonel blimp - c'mon! no mass hysteria here.


Domitianus - shame on you! methinks you are being very naughty and trying to start a fight with the ladies on this thread. it's just not the same thing and you know it!

Domitianus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Unless, of course, you are a breast-feeding mother

> in which case you are entitled to expose any part

> of your anatomy in any place you please and damn

> the offense to anyone else.


This post is so funny it's almost worthy of Louisa! Very very good effort! (Worth pointing out though that it isn't just their entitlement, but their legally enshrined right! Ha!)

Domitianus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > yes, of course the two are entirely

> > comparable.......tool

>

> @#$%&!


That was t**t, btw.

Was the kid getting off at the sight of the young children? If so then this incident is very concerning, he could well be a paedophile in the making. The sexual urges you keep for live begin at 11-13 yrs old. If you're gonna be hetrosexual, gay or a nonce then you definitely know by the time you are 13.


If all he was doing was having a quick one in the bushes, it is less concerning. I spent some time in India a few years ago and reguarly saw young lads beating one off in 'semi-private' places, never really bothered me. Lets face it, wanking is the number one hobby of 13 year old boys.

  • 4 weeks later...
told a mum friend of mine about this thread yesterday morning and would you believe, she saw this boy yesterday afternoon after school hours. she was with her young son. again, dul park, school boy dropped his trousers in front of her whilst looking at her. she confronted him and gave chase but he got away. police attended the park and it appears they are taking this seriously. again, incident took place near to play area.

eater81 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Was the kid getting off at the sight of the young

> children? If so then this incident is very

> concerning, he could well be a paedophile in the

> making. The sexual urges you keep for live begin

> at 11-13 yrs old. If you're gonna be hetrosexual,

> gay or a nonce then you definitely know by the

> time you are 13.

>


Utter nonsense.


Good way to whip this up a notch though.

eater81 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Was the kid getting off at the sight of the young

> children? If so then this incident is very

> concerning, he could well be a paedophile in the

> making. The sexual urges you keep for live begin

> at 11-13 yrs old. If you're gonna be hetrosexual,

> gay or a nonce then you definitely know by the

> time you are 13.

>


Utter nonsense.


Good way to whip this up a notch though.

I think that to be honest the uniform could be any school they nearly all have that uniform its generic and the only way to know for sure is the badge on a blazer, It is worrying if it was near the kids play park, but it's more likely he just wanted to bat one off in the bushes and any bushes would do. It would be a shame if he was labelled as a sex criminal at that age but having said that any one should be able to understand the concerns of a mum. Lets hope he is caught and reprimanded and gets the message that tugging in public is not acceptable.Lets hope his "can do" attitude develops into something more positive .
I think that to be honest the uniform could be any school they nearly all have that uniform its generic and the only way to know for sure is the badge on a blazer, It is worrying if it was near the kids play park, but it's more likely he just wanted to bat one off in the bushes and any bushes would do. It would be a shame if he was labelled as a sex criminal at that age but having said that any one should be able to understand the concerns of a mum. Lets hope he is caught and reprimanded and gets the message that tugging in public is not acceptable.Lets hope his "can do" attitude develops into something more positive .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
    • I always like Redemptions coffee though I've not visted for awhile..Romeo Jones was always my 1st choice for takeout Coffee Redemption 2nd. What IS with all these independent Yoga and Pilates Studios? Theres one on London Rd in Forest Hill (Mind) thats recently opened and then theres the Pilates place thats opened on North X Road. I looked at the prices of the one on NorthX road and was frankly shocked at how expensive it is, The FH one is slightly less.  Made me decide to stick with classes in The local authority gym
    • Dulwich Village update: The old DVillage location is (again?) under offer. The storefront next to the new grocer is going to open as a yoga and pilates studio...the name of which I've forgotten. 🤦‍♂️  Megan's is starting to push its takeaway coffee and cannibalise some of Redemption Coffee's market share. Is Megan's struggling? It's quite a big restaurant they have and rent cant be cheap. The reinventing of the Megan's branch on Lordship Lane as Ollie's seems to have stalled. And Redemption is looking a bit tired these days...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...