Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear Admin,


call you tell me if there is there a nifty way of doing a 'forward to all' email???


when I send out reminders and news to the regulars for the monthly Backgammon evening I have to (sort of, as typing in the first letter brings up all those that start with that letter) re-enter all the names. I would love to just be able to re-send to my existing group and just add in any new comers... any tips?


thanks in advance and hope you are refreshed for hols

xxCC

If someone's ever replied to all on one of your previos circulars, just do a reply to all on that with all new content. But no I don't think there's a mail group type functionality on the forum I'm afraid.


I guess you could get everyones email addresses atthe event itself and use email, or phone numbers and text(some phones allow for txting groups)

Possibly helpful is the Buddies option - if you add people as a Buddy (you can do this by clicking on their name in any message, and at the bottome of their profile you will see the relevant link) , and click on the Buddies link in the PM page, you get a list of people you have added - just tick the box next to each name you want to send to
  • 2 weeks later...



cool... top tip Mockney... got the 'reply all' from someone else and off I go... backgammon rocks... nearly a year since I set up the monthly evening... really nice crowd and always nice new comers... so THANK YOU Forum admin...


xxCC

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • From the BBC: "The conclusion of that deliberation is that we accept that the way the speech was edited did give the impression of a direct call for violent action. The BBC would like to apologise for that error of judgement." What is wrong is editing someone to make him say something they didn't.  With respect Sephiroth, this is something I know a bit about and I have encountered, over the last decade, people in programming editing contributors to make them say things they didn't, the end point being to hang them out to dry. It's happening more and more and it's my job to make sure that people on TV are not mis-represented, but shown in their true light so that viewers can make up their own minds. You have no idea what goes on behind the scenes and how hard some us fight to keep things impartial.  It's also worth mentioning that I have personally lost work because of Trump suing US networks, and that's one of the lesser reasons why I'd like to see him gone.  But broadcasters have a moral obligation to tell the truth and that's the hill that most decent professionals in the industry are willing to die on. Otherwise, how can the viewing public trust anything that's beamed into their living rooms? 
    • Amazing work from Leon, doing out electrical survey and replacing our consumer board. Great communications, tidy work, reliable friendly and reasonably priced. A pleasure to have around and highly recommended. 
    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...