Jump to content

Does anyone else miss TLS's + Bigbadwolf's posts?

daizie

By daizie
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

TLS is a man who wanted to select where to house his family on the basis that the skin colour of the neighborhood defines its criminality.


What the hell is going on in the UK that people think it's okay to say that? I mean really, what is going on in people's heads? WTF? There's no room for that in society, regardless of a forum.


TLS just sent me a PM too, but it make me ask myself how crazy he is? His views are absolutely noxious. He slanders 4 billion people by saying that skin colour defines criminality, and then says he's offended? He's offended?


If people think that's a 'lover not a fighter' then I despair. There's no more value in that observation than in the residents of Buchenwald saying that the Kommandant down at the camp made a lovely cup of tea.


It's sick and its twisted. The fact that it's Tunbridge Wells bumptiousness doesn't make it cute or cuddly.


As for being a liar, guess what, it didn't end on a PM it went straight to the thread. This the the spat where TLS brought up the issue of my 'safety' and 'suffering the consequences'. I actually asked him "live on line" whether he had just threatened me. I didn't feel that the observation was bad form because it came into the threads.


As per usual TLS swerved it, but where I come from the question "do you want to come down and meet my mates" is absolutely explicit. It's school playground viciousness. It's saying 'you don't disagree just with me, but with my back-up, and you're going to meet them.'.


I also remember with absolute clarity the screechy harpies who try to get off on a 'technicality' like they're negotiating with teacher. The ones who don't apologise for nasty acts, the ones who yowl 'prove it, prooove it', because they think they're smart. Other people are absolutely entitled to their own interpretation. But both myself and TLS knew what he meant, and so do most people.

Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

TLS is a man who wanted to select where to house his family on the basis that the skin colour of the neighborhood defines its criminality.


What the hell is going on in the UK that people think it's okay to say that? I mean really, what is going on in people's heads? WTF? There's no room for that in society, regardless of a forum.


TLS just sent me a PM too, but it make me ask myself how crazy he is? His views are absolutely noxious. He slanders 4 billion people by saying that skin colour defines criminality, and then says he's offended? He's offended?


If people think that's a 'lover not a fighter' then I despair. There's no more value in that observation than in the residents of Buchenwald saying that the Kommandant down at the camp made a lovely cup of tea.


It's sick and its twisted. The fact that it's Tunbridge Wells bumptiousness doesn't make it cute or cuddly.


As for being a liar, guess what, it didn't end on a PM it went straight to the thread. This the the spat where TLS brought up the issue of my 'safety' and 'suffering the consequences'. I actually asked him "live on line" whether he had just threatened me. I didn't feel that the observation was bad form because it came into the threads.


As per usual TLS swerved it, but where I come from the question "do you want to come down and meet my mates" is absolutely explicit. It's school playground viciousness. It's saying 'you don't disagree just with me, but with my back-up, and you're going to meet them.'.


I also remember with absolute clarity the screechy harpies who try to get off on a 'technicality' like they're negotiating with teacher. The ones who don't apologise for nasty acts, the ones who yowl 'prove it, prooove it', because they think they're smart. Other people are absolutely entitled to their own interpretation. But both myself and TLS knew what he meant, and so do most people.

LegalEagle-ish

LegalEagle-ish

Posted
Posted

Huguenot, it just goes to page 1 which is fairly lame - can you post a link to the interesting bit pls cos I don't want to trawl through it all.


I agree with you by the way, I think he was totally obnoxious and definitely rascist. Just cos he is shagging a black woman doesn't mean he can be as rascist as he likes and say he's not.


I was a bit shocked when he said you'd made it up - you don't need to make anything up - he hangs himself without any need for others to add stuff.

LegalEagle-ish

LegalEagle-ish

Posted
Posted

Huguenot, it just goes to page 1 which is fairly lame - can you post a link to the interesting bit pls cos I don't want to trawl through it all.


I agree with you by the way, I think he was totally obnoxious and definitely rascist. Just cos he is shagging a black woman doesn't mean he can be as rascist as he likes and say he's not.


I was a bit shocked when he said you'd made it up - you don't need to make anything up - he hangs himself without any need for others to add stuff.

*Bob*

*Bob*

Posted
Posted

Huge,


Leaving aside the fact you explicitly said that the supposed threat 'was by PM' earlier - which is never was (an unusual slip of the tongue for someone who is ususally so on the ball with 'the facts'.


Leaving that aside, I've read it, and I'm afraid I don't see what you see, because it isn't there.


Talk of 'safety' is specifically about you getting to say whatever you want on here without fear of retribution because you you are (allegedly) in the with in crowd (whoever they are)


'Suffering the consequences' is about you (allegedly) being able to preach the wonders of a racially diverse population but never having to live with the consequences of the problems it (allegedly) creates.


I'm afraid you're wrong on this one.

*Bob*

*Bob*

Posted
Posted

Huge,


Leaving aside the fact you explicitly said that the supposed threat 'was by PM' earlier - which is never was (an unusual slip of the tongue for someone who is ususally so on the ball with 'the facts'.


Leaving that aside, I've read it, and I'm afraid I don't see what you see, because it isn't there.


Talk of 'safety' is specifically about you getting to say whatever you want on here without fear of retribution because you you are (allegedly) in the with in crowd (whoever they are)


'Suffering the consequences' is about you (allegedly) being able to preach the wonders of a racially diverse population but never having to live with the consequences of the problems it (allegedly) creates.


I'm afraid you're wrong on this one.

*Bob*

*Bob*

Posted
Posted

And...


I can't find the 'come and meet my mates' part either (unless I've missed it)


Tony talks about his mates - his point being that they are are actually ethnically diverse unlike most of the (allegedly) namby-pamby white liberal wishy-washy guardianistas posting about a rainbow utopia on here.


He also suggests that should you go and meet people (he offers to pay your air fare, which is generous) in other non-white countries whose alleged cultural identity has allegedly been eroded as ours allegedly has here - and hear what they might have to say about it - you might also hear a robust response.

*Bob*

*Bob*

Posted
Posted

And...


I can't find the 'come and meet my mates' part either (unless I've missed it)


Tony talks about his mates - his point being that they are are actually ethnically diverse unlike most of the (allegedly) namby-pamby white liberal wishy-washy guardianistas posting about a rainbow utopia on here.


He also suggests that should you go and meet people (he offers to pay your air fare, which is generous) in other non-white countries whose alleged cultural identity has allegedly been eroded as ours allegedly has here - and hear what they might have to say about it - you might also hear a robust response.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • fishboy
      GALA 2026

      By fishboy · Posted

      It struck me last year that any dialogue with Gala themselves e.g. at the box-ticking "Community Engagement Sessions" is completely pointless, as they are just a business trying to do whatever is necessary to hold their event; the park is just a venue to them, a necessary facility, and they'll say anything to secure it. They don't care about it's welfare or upkeep, over and above making sure there's no complaints big enough to prevent them using it again. I've found that discussing issues with them has just led to them using that info to counteract that issue - effectively helping them strengthen their position. What I find frustrating is that the council, despite being the body that decides on this, and should be representing local residents, takes no active part in any discussions or presentations, so there's no way to engage with them apart from an online consultation which is clearly also a box ticking exercise, bearing in mind for the last two years the overwhelming majority (97% of respondents) objected to the event. Why are Gala running the community meetings? Why do Gala run the issue hotline? If the council really care about the park and the surrounding community, and still allow this type of event, they should be way more hands on with taking responsibility for it's running, not just handing it all over to a profit making company.  Sorry, probably tldr but so sad about the repeated negative impact on our (once beautiful & peaceful) park and just exasperated that there's so little that can be done to halt it. This is just the start, it WILL turn into another Brockwell Park, and Gala & the council just don't care.
    • RodwellrdH
      Trade Hub Plumbing and Heating

      By RodwellrdH · Posted

      We used these guys for our underfloor heating, their heating engineer Sam was excellent. Very reassuring and sorted it all out properly.
    • Earl Aelfheah
      One of our local councillors has hit the big time

      By Earl Aelfheah · Posted

      They’re convenient. They’re fun to ride. From ED, getting a Lime to Brixton and then jumping on the tube is probably the fastest way to get into central London. There’s a reason they’re  popular.
    • Cancerian
      One of our local councillors has hit the big time

      By Cancerian · Posted

      You must be a cynic as in a previous post you’ve asked someone to have a go on one of these monstrous lime bikes! Not everyone is able to walk, let alone ride a bike! 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...