Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,


I'm currently trying to buy a flat in the area, but the one I have my eye on has been underpinned. My first thought was to walk away, but from doing a lot of research into the area it seems that a significant amount of properties seem to be underpinned due to the area being mostly built on clay.


I'm not so worried about the structural side of it as the udnerpinning was done 4 years ago and there are no side of cracks, but I am concerned about selling on in 5 or so years time. Has anyone had experience in this area or found it a problem?


Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8599-underpinning-in-houses-in-ed/
Share on other sites

south London is built on clay - it moves a fair bit...the first time you buy a property here this is scary stuff. On the whole, in the grand scheme of things, it don't matter too much most housing stock here is 100+ years old and still standing but surveyors etc like to point it out as they'll petrified get sued if not. If you can get a mortgage on it it's probably alright and indeed the problem should have been put right. Is my NON-professional opinion.
I think as long as you've got the paperwork you're fine. We almost bought an underpinned house on Keston Rd a few years ago but the paperwork wasn't complete and it was a battle to get insurance - so in the end we walked away. But I think it was an exception, most are no problem.

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Check to see how long the underpinning's

> guaranteed for, it maybe quite a while (ours is

> guaranteed for 25 years).


xxxxxxx


That's OK as long as the company who did it doesn't go out of business (as a surveyor advised me re a damp guarantee on a flat I was going to buy once)

Hmmmmm - underpinning sometimes causes more problems than it solves, depending how it is done.


Fixing (i.e. stopping the movement to some extent) of one house in a row can cause it to move away from the non underpinned others and cause more probs all around than if not done at all.


You need a view from a surveyor (and I'm not one!!) who knows the area and takes a view on anything that may cause damaging ground movement local to your proposed flat given the particular underpinning treatment - e.g. trees and concrete driveways have a surprising impact IMHO

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mark Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Check to see how long the underpinning's

> > guaranteed for, it maybe quite a while (ours is

> > guaranteed for 25 years).

>

> xxxxxxx


Underpinning is often guaranteed by a third party.


My personal view is that if a house needed it, and someone fixed it and guaranteed it for 25 years, it's probably the most solid house on the street...

>

> That's OK as long as the company who did it

> doesn't go out of business (as a surveyor advised

> me re a damp guarantee on a flat I was going to

> buy once)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The coop of Forest Hill Road is very different- cheerful and helpful staff 
    • Would you expose your young people to 'that man'? That is apparently a real question. 'That man' is in fact a retired Oxford Professor of Moral & Pastoral Theology who wrote a book setting out to provide a moral reckoning on the vexed subject of Britain's Empire and its history. What might formerly have been a purely academic matter has become highly contentious, and according to one Cambridge academic "serious shit" that needed to be CLOSED DOWN. It's all rather amazing, the stuff of satire or nightmare but not of the real world. Anyway, Lord Biggar accepted an invitation to visit Peckham and speak to and with a small audience that was due to include young Black students ... who in the end didn't come on the day! Having set the whole thing up to facilitate this encounter for them, the outcome was a disappointment. The conversation with Lord Biggar and audience was not:   
    • Entertaining a visitor from Philippines, she's been here before but I've promised lunch.  Somewhere a little different maybe, quirky?
    • Surely a very simple: "how much does the council receive from the organisers of the Gala festival for payment for use of Peckham Rye" would smoke out a response. The "commercial sensitivity" could be because the council are giving it away or it could be because Gala don't want others to know how much they are paying - it is really tough to make money from any type of festival these days and Wide Awake in Brockwell, for example, sent out a plea for people to buy tickets via a reduced price "Tell a Friend" special offer because (they said much of it linked to the problems Lambeth were having with the High Court) things were entering "squeaky bum time"  and they were struggling to hit their break-even point. It does make me wonder whether expansion is baked-in to the agreements the council has with the organisers for events like Gala as the organisers have to be able to scale the size of the event each year to try to make money. I do also how much of the "revenue" from these events might be swallowed up by the provision of the "free community" event element of them. The comment piece in the Guardian sums it up quite nicely: The heart of this issue seems to be how cash-strapped councils are becoming increasingly beholden to commercial interests to the detriment of the public. A weekend festival that welcomes 50,000 people can expect to raise about £500,000 for local authorities. Councils argue that this money goes back in the public purse, allowing them to continue funding free community events such as Lambeth’s beloved Country Show, though there doesn’t seem to be much transparency over exactly how much cash is raised or where it is allocated.   The issue for councils may well be that if people found out how much was actually being raised by these events that the community would say the disruption is not worth it and I do wonder how much of the revenue is being swallowed up by the provision of the "free event" using the same infrastructure. Any time a council doesn't want to share something openly very much suggests that it is because they think constituents won't like the answer.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...