Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Really, really sorry the following may appear so boring, but there are possibly huge safety implications.

Someone I know has a 100+ year old house in the area. Recently, having got an electrician in to do some work on a fault in the kitchen wiring, the earth into the house was discovered to be very dodgy.


Plumbing, central heating and the casings of big appliances are all earthed so that in the event of a wiring fault the current will ?run to earth? and trip out at the consumer unit rather than run through a person. With a dodgy earth, the person could share the current with possibly unfortunate results.


The kitchen wiring fault was repaired and an EDF engineer was called in. He confirmed the earth dodginess and insisted on turning off the power supply at the consumer unit for safety before he left.

Cutting a very involved story short, eventually the power company dug up the pavement and re-made the earth to the incoming service sheath. These engineers reckoned that the earth may never have been very good (or even existed!) on the electrical supply sheathing since the water pipes and gas pipes in the past were always metal and this provided convenient good earthing. Only the one house that reported the fault was treated by the engineers!

The house has a plastic incoming water pipe. The gas pipes are metal into the house, but inside (amazingly) there is a plastic tube which runs out under the street, invisible to the householder. Any effective earthing for the house from these two services has gone because of the modern use of plastics.

There was no indication that anything was wrong. But when the kitchen wiring fault happened, the electrician found all metal surfaces in the house were live! It is unknown how long the wiring fault had existed or how the occupants had escaped electric shocks.


Much of this area must have been converted to plastic pipe gas and water supply.

Can anyone with technical knowledge shed some light on this phenomenon?

Is it a real concern?

Is there an easy way to check if our home is affected?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/877-electrical-safety-in-ed-houses/
Share on other sites

Nothing boring about that JA - we renovated our otherwise completely run down house about 4 years ago, and all the above faults were found to exist. Electrical engineers in ED with any knowledge of local history will always make the above checks whenever they're working at any house.


Incidentally, we changed our incoming gas supply from metal to gas for safety reasons. Most in ED ars still metal.


The only easy way is to call out an engineer I'm afraid, although they don't have to be EDF.

Thanks H.

Looks like only we two have a curious interest in domestic electrocution. Er . . . did I mention that the electrician found a Cloth Bag in the cellar. Under the sleeping Lost Cat in the Cloth Bag was a Dogs on Leash Petition, on the reverse of which was a map showing the proposed locations in LL of M&S, a New Coffee Bar and Liddle?

Not at all J - but for me it's one of those things I know I ought to sort out but as nothing has gone wrong yet, find it easier to play parlour games on the forum


From what work I have done in the flat the electrics seem to be in better shape than a lot of the other infrastructure when the house was converted. But better doesn't necessarily mean good enough. It's good to know about these things and thanks for the heads up

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...