Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This letter just received from TfL


Dear xxxxx,


Bus stopping arrangements in the St Giles High Street area have now changed, and will remain in place until at least late 2016. This is due to the London Borough of Camden improvements for pedestrians, cyclists and road users in the Tottenham Court Road area.

Bus Route 176


The final stop is now on Great Russell Street, outside the YMCA. This is a permanent change.


Yours sincerely,

Signature_________________Image not displayed

Tony Akers

Bus Operations Manager


I love the gloss on the word 'improvement' - TfL-speak for **cked.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/87756-176-route-changes/
Share on other sites

I'm quite annoyed by this. The south east is under represented in the London transport network and we're facing another set back to our journeys to central London. The 176 is my lifeline to going out in London and meetings as we have no tube. Take into account the massacre that is Elephant and Castle roundabout, and we all may as well leave south east London.


Edit: bad spelling

NewWave Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, I get the number 12 when theres a tube

> strike, but I live near the Horniman and the 12

> stops at Dulwich library.

> Its a bit of a walk after a day at work unless I

> change buses.


You can take a short cut via the council houses between Friern Road and Etherow Street to the first 12 bus stop on Barry Road.

New Girl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm quite annoyed by this. The south east is under

> represented in the London transport network and

> we're facing another set back to our journeys to

> central London. The 176 is my lifeline to going

> out in London and meetings as we have no tube.

> Take into account the massacre that is Elephant

> and Castle roundabout, and we all may as well

> leave south east London.

>

> Edit: bad spelling


The re-routing isn't a major change, instead of terminating in New Oxford Street, it'll go to Great Russell Street instead. The main issue with the 176 is that since the changes to the Elephant & Castle roundabout, journeys from ED to central London are taking much longer. (This isn't an issue during the festive period, but will return on Jan 4th when everyone goes back to work).

Hmmm I never understand the general attitude as if it's the end of the world when a small alteration to any route occurs... it's NOT a huge deal. You'll have to a walk a little if you need to be further up.

The whole business with elephant is a silly grumble - we all know it's going to take a while for everything to be completed and for regular road users to become familiar with the new layout (hence the traffic) so be sensible and allow a little extra for your journey - get up earlier and think ahead instead of leaving things to the last minute. *shrugs*

If Boris would stop diverting money from the infrastructure budget into follies like the Emirates cable car and garden bridge, or else into subsidising private developments marketed at overseas investors, and actually started using that money (collected from taxpayers) to serve taxpayers, things perhaps would improve. As it stands, SE London has no superhighway, no hire bikes, no tube, and extremely slow and unpredictable buses (and an even worse, provincial rail service). it's a fecking disgrace.

New Girl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm quite annoyed by this... Take into account the massacre that is Elephant

> and Castle roundabout, and we all may as well

> leave south east London.

That's a bit melodramatic. Why are you annoyed? The end point for the route is being moved from one half block south of TCR tube to one block north of TCR tube. It's not getting shorter.

I'm annoyed because instead of making routes better and more accessible in SE London, they change them or cut them or don't even bother. Rahrahrah hit the nail on the head with what I was trying to get at(and expressed much more eloquently). SE transport infrastructure is lacking.

New Girl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm annoyed because instead of making routes

> better and more accessible in SE London, they

> change them or cut them or don't even bother.

> Rahrahrah hit the nail on the head with what I was

> trying to get at(and expressed much more

> eloquently). SE transport infrastructure is

> lacking.


I disagree - it's a bloomin' good service we have already! Yes there's room for improvement but that's the same for many things!


ETA - the night service is a godsend! Go back 10+ years, that's where you could've been sitting there complaining.

Yeah, I agree. Some people on here get themselves into a right froth about there not being a tube but public transport doesn't begin and end with tubes. There are overland stations all over the place, good cycle links and a ton of bus options. Moving the final bus stop of one of those routes 150m north isn't the end of the world.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> ETA - the night service is a godsend! Go back 10+

> years, that's where you could've been sitting

> there complaining.


And it doesn't seem that long ago (though I'm sure it probably is!) there was no Sunday service on the trains going through East Dulwich.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...