Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We've recently hired a nanny before I go back to work full time in February. We agreed to start her on a two day week before I went back to work as a kind of retainer until I started work even though we didn't really need her. There have been several odd incidents including a few white lies, kids being taken to shopping mall over Xmas, taken to soft play with her boyfriend without asking etc most importantly she really hasn't bonded with my daughters. I feel we are just a pay cheque to her and there is no warmth or love! So I'd like to stop the employment ASAP. She is still in her probationary period so I thought I would give her notice (I really don't want her looking after my kids now as I feel it would be awkward after finishing so soon). Anyway have just looked at her contract and it says I have to give 2 months notice (or 3 months notice if potion is being made redundant) 'notwithstanding' probationary period which I ha looked up and that means in spite of eg, the probationary period makes no real difference! Is this legally binding? Any advice greatly appreciated thanks
the exact terminology regarding termination of contract is "Notwithstanding the probationary period under this contract and following confirmation of your employment on the employer may terminate your employment on 8 weeks notice or such longer period"

The use of "notwithstanding" confuses this a little. Generally I would take this to mean that the probationary period is a separate situation (and usually there would be a specific separate notice period assigned to the probation), and once this is up, the standard notice period applies.


Is there a separate clause in the contract relating to the probationary period?

yes the clause about the probationary period says that the first three months of your employment will be a probationary period during which your performance will be kept under review?.thats it!

thanks so much for your advice much appreciated

It may be helpful for you to give one of the nanny payroll companies a call - even if you don't currently use one, they are very helpful in giving ad hoc advice in my experience.


We use Nanny PAYE (have done so for 6 years) and they are very helpful.


My personal interpretation of the above is that the notice period does not apply to probation period but I'm not a lawyer!

Most nanny contracts are 4 weeks notice (from either party) and immediate (or max 1 week) notice during the probationary period which is usually the first month. The "Notwithstanding" could be read either way, but your best bet is to argue convincingly that the probationary period is not subject to the 8 week notice period and that you therefore have no required notice period to give her (should she question it). If you are happy to give her 4 weeks pay in lieu of any notice period then do so to avoid any arguments since ultimately she's being paid for not working and can look for a job herself. If you are not happy with her then definitely terminate the arrangement as soon as possible - you should be able to leave your kids in childcare (nanny, nursery, childminder) and walk away without any concerns. Working is stressful enough without constant concern about your children's welfare! Having said that, have you had any conversations with her about your concerns?


If you do look for a nanny in the future I recommend getting a contract from one of the nanny tax companies or from the forum (happy to share ours) so you have control over the terms.

My understanding of the words 'notwithstanding' means 'in spite of' meaning that the same notice applies in probationary period as well. However it sounds like the probationary period can be reviewed if it isn't a case of 'no longer needing a nanny'. For example the contract is between yourself and the nanny, would the fact that 'other parties' (boyfriend) were present without your consent constitute as a breach of contract? I have been an au pair in the past, and I wouldn't dream of including anyone else in a day's work without consent from my employer.
Bringing boyfriend into the working day without your consent would be a breach of trust if not contract? I'm assuming you've not seen his DBS/CRB check?! At the very least the white lies and bringing the boyfriend along shows little respect of professionalism during the probationary period, when people are on their best behaviour.
I agree that the use of "notwithstanding" is ambiguous and probably misplaced. You could however credibly argue that the termination clause is intended to operate outside the probation period (otherwise what would be the point of having a probation period?). The next part of the clause is also important as it suggests that the right to terminate comes into play "following confirmation of your employment" something which you normally do at the end of a probation period once the parties are happy with how the first month(s) has gone.
Thanks so much for all this brilliant advice is making me feel so much less stressed about the whole situation! In retrospect I realise how silly I was to sign the contract there and then and not take it back for a proper read of the terms. But maybe that's why she has been dialling it in in probationary period and meeting boyfriend etc because she knows it will be hard for me to get rid of her!

We have been very lucky to have had two excellent nannies who were (well, one still is working for us) very diligent, honest and truly excellent with the kids. My 3yr old can tell me everything so I know she's happy and they all have fun together doing interesting things. Our nanny asked me today if she could drop by one of the shopping malls after a playgroup to exchange some shoes and I thought of your situation - I have absolutely no problem with her doing so but definitely like to know if she does things like that. Not being told about where they're going and what they're doing would make me wary.


Anyway, I wanted to note that, as with all childcare options, it's about finding the right fit for you and your kids. Has your older one been in nursery before? Perhaps a childminder might be a middle ground? If you have been the primary carer for your kids for a while then you'll find a period of time when they play up no matter what the childcare. My older one (who had previously been with a nanny but from 2yrs to 2.8yrs was with me) really played up with our current nanny for at least a month. She would hit her sometimes (knowing it was wrong), cry when I left in the morning etc but then have a fun day with her when I wasn't around. Now she absolutely adores our nanny but still has days when all she wants is me (which is pretty frustrating when I'm trying to leave the house!).


Hope you're able to terminate the contract without too much trouble - you have no obligation to continue employing her and are giving her a fair settlement for termination of her employment during the probationary period. So don't stress about it, just have a conversation before she leaves today and if all goes well you could just start with a clean slate on Monday and not worry about it this weekend). Try not to be apologetic about it either - it'll suggest you're somehow doing something wrong when you're clearly not.

I would read that notwithstanding meaning 'excluding'. I work with legal contracts all the time and I'd say that you would be very unlucky for anyone to interpret it otherwise if it was brought to court. I hope you find the right solution for your family.
Notwithstanding in a legal context creates an exception to the position as it otherwise might be so, depending on the exact context and assuming there's no specified notice period during the probationary period, then I think the clause would likely be interpreted by a court as demanding a 2 month notice period which is unusual and very onerous. As a pragmatic suggestion, perhaps you could dismiss her and offer to pay 1 month in lieu of notice and she whether she quibbles. Then you could always negotiate something between 1 and 2 mths to get rid of her. The context however will be key.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would you like to rephrase this?  Your wording gives the impression that TfL is trying to expel its own employees from the country. TfL has changed nothing. The government visa rules have changed and this affects some TfL staff and their right to work in the UK.  As far as I am aware, TfL and the Mayor are working with the unions to try and keep those affected in their jobs.
    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...