Jump to content

Recommended Posts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dulwich Fox to make another trip to Kings, this

> time to remove his head from his arse...


Red Devil took 18 mins to take the bait.. Slipping there, but beat ????.


Funny I have had 2 visits to Kings in the past month. One late at night by Ambulance.

I have another 3 appointments due in early 2017.. These are more urgent.

I have been told there is a waiting list for removing heads from arses and it would seem there are a few

Forumites in front of me..


Foxy

ed_pete Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AM finally sells his History of Irish Tennis (in

> three volumes) or perhaps that's a little

> optimistic.


I kid you not it reared it's head on Irish radio the day before yesterday. After 51 minutes on the podcast..


http://www.rte.ie/radio1/liveline/programmes/2016/1207/837246-liveline-wednesday-7-december-2016/?clipid=2349445#2349445


Anyway, my copies are going for free to a good home.


PS It would be a little less confusing it there was a thread for 2017 predictions.

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Which Peckham Stalls in particular?


Not sure if you're pulling my leg or not, titch, but I meant the gentrification process will stall, i.e. run out of steam. Not referring to market stalls!

David Beckham comes out at long last his wife Vicky Beckham admits she never sang one word on any of the spice girls hits. And cracks a smile while saying it. Every mp who commits expences fraud saids l know it was not within the rules.but it was worth the risk. And this one is a sure thing (every time someone posts a political view.everyone will agree)

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Which Peckham Stalls in particular?

>

> Not sure if you're pulling my leg or not, titch,

> but I meant the gentrification process will stall,

> i.e. run out of steam. Not referring to market

> stalls!


It was gentle tug at the leg. Apologies, i was trying to be clever! ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...