Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Daizie are you referring to Uncle Ben's microwave

> rice that you can leave in sachet and takes two

> minutes?


Yes, the orange packet jimmy jimmy, i cant taste the difference after a 1.5ltr bottle of Hock

If you eat rice more than once or twice a week, get a rice cooker (ignore *Bob*, follow the rest of the rice-eating world)


If not, give it a rinse, equal volume of rice and water, up to the boil, lid on, turn it right down and wait for 15 minutes or so. When there are little holes in the surface of the rice, turn it off and leave it for 10 minutes or so (lid on).

I've been looking into this rice cooker business, seeing as everyone here seems to think the sun shines out of their arse.


Apparently, I still have to measure the rice, wash the rice, add salt, measure the water and turn it on, just like I have to do with my prehistoric saucepan. I was a least expecting it might blow me off or something afterwards. But no.



"Disappointed of East Dulwich"

All you have to do jimmy is keep stirring it, dont leave it and go off and do something else, then you will be able to judge when to take it off the 'stove', timing is everything. The same when bbq'ing. If you constantly keep turning the meat and give it your full love, it wont burn, honest :)

>>Apparently, I still have to measure the rice, wash the rice, add salt, measure the water and turn it on, just like I have to do with my prehistoric saucepan. I was a least expecting it might blow me off or something afterwards. But no.


Have you seen the latest series of rice cookers the Japanese and Chinese have developed? they can do all sort of things. Brown rice, sticky rice, you can even use it as a steamer. I bought mine in HK and I use it most days. And no, you do NOT add salt to the rice...


I am not saying everyone should invest in a rice cooker, I believe you can cook perfectly tasty rice from a saucepan. But using a rice cooker doesn't make you a lazy person.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Fair enough - I'm absolutely wrong on that one. 👍
    • I'm still completely unclear what happened, apart from that a car apparently crashed into a lamp post opposite the Co-op. I presume the one in Lordship Lane, though the OP doesn't say. Was it speeding? Did it swerve to avoid someone who ran into the road? Did something go wrong with its brakes or steering? Did the driver have a medical emergency or fall asleep or got  distracted by something? Was there something slippery on the road surface? Was the driver hurt? Were any passengers hurt? Were any pedestrians or other road users hurt? Were there any witnesses? 
    • confused by the question?
    • My point was in response to this:  "The idea that serving as a local councillor (including dealing with the public, internal party politics - which is always the most vicious where the stakes are lowest, and plenty of unpaid prep work) is a great pathway for careerists and moneygrabbers is utter shite. On a per hour basis you'd be far better off working at Sainsbos."   You could give up your job at sainsbury's and do a councillor's work and be very much better off. Most of these councillors earn this sort of money and still have full time jobs on the side.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...