Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm sure many of you are already aware of the plight of this Herne Hill institution, we are lucky enough in East Dulwich to host a sister shop on Lordship Lane, hence the reason for this post.


Unfortunately it looks like the Herne Hill branch may soon be forced to shut its doors on the children of southeast London for good on account of a rather mercenary hike in the rent by the landlord, Dulwich Estates.


There is more information on the changing nature of this part of London, and the role played by some of the larger landlords, in the following link:


http://www.hernehill.org.uk/news/herne-hill-cross-roads


For those of you who care about local traders and the demise of the independent shop, please follow the next link and do sign the petition if you feel strongly enough about supporting Just William and are interested in making a stand against unrealistic rent increases forced upon many of the independent businesses in this corner of London.


http://www.hernehill.org.uk/news/70-rent-increase-dulwich-estates-has-driven-out-just-williams


Many thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/90980-just-william-herne-hill/
Share on other sites

Why? On another thread they have a sister shop on Lordship Lane.


Why cannot the Landlord run his business as a profitable concern.


If he cannot let the shop he has got it wrong.


If it is that important to the "children" people will be more than to pay to compensate for the rent rise.


There are more important concerns than this.

I am very saddened to read about these changes that are more extensive than I had previously understood. Whilst some turnover amongst units is perhaps beneficial (for example, see the brewers recently occupying the Norwood Road and Rosendale Rd arches) I firmly believe the extensive changes that are shortly coming have the potential to make the area unrecognisable, and not in a good way.


As a long term resident of the area, it seems to me that the behaviour of Dulwich Estates reflects a short term focus on financial gain at the expense of long term impact in the community. This should come as no surprise given their activity in recent years, where we have seen several entirely self centred developments from this faceless organisation. One of the most outrageous being the residential development in Dulwich village on the former Audi car showroom site, but also see the mismanagement of the public houses (Half Moon, Greyhound and Harvester) in recent times.


The beneficiaries from this mismanagement/abuse of the community by Dulwich Estate represent a number of local public schools, a clear minority. Meanwhile, the fabric of the area is changed for which we all suffer.


When I walked home last night I passed the Herne Hill sign under the railway bridge which had been daubed in pink paint, presumably by some moron with nothing better to do. I was pretty disgusted by such a pointless act of vandalism, yet on reflection, it's a no less constructive contribution to the area than that we have seen from Dulwich Estate's recently.


MB

richard tudor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why? On another thread they have a sister shop on

> Lordship Lane.

>

> Why cannot the Landlord run his business as a

> profitable concern.

>

> If he cannot let the shop he has got it wrong.

>

> If it is that important to the "children" people

> will be more than to pay to compensate for the

> rent rise.

>

> There are more important concerns than this.


As a local resident I have the right to be concerned about this. The landlord in question is the Dulwich Estate, a registered charity. Just William is one of an increasing number of small businesses who, after more than a decade of trade, are now falling victim to an arguably aggressive revenue raising exercise by said charity.


Small independent business is the driving force of communities such as East Dulwich and Herne Hill, and when we start seeing some of the trailblazers, such as Just William, swept aside (the Herne Hill branch is the original shop) then we are on dangerous ground indeed.

Bloke in that londonist article basically groats about having priced people out of the area before moaning about an inevitable consequence.


I'm absolutely no fan of the Dulwich Estate, but how can anyone be surprised?


How do the new rents compare to a unit on Lordship Lane out of interest?

That is how commercial business operates.


If I wanted to open a new business would I be able to have the same rates as trail blazer business?


Yummy mummy pressure is not important financial cash flows are the driving force. Form a local co-operative and take it over.

It is then the work of a short termist and possibly foolish commercial business.


Great post on the Londonist I'm going to point you to here:


"The end result of this process as you describe it is a high street full of chain stores that looks the same as anywhere else as these are the only companies who can pay such rents... the area loses it's unique appeal and people stop visiting. Chain stores are owned by national and international interests and pay minimum wage so the families who used to own their own businesses end up stacking shelves in Waitrose for minimum wage. Also, as far as 'landlords asking the rent they can get'... look at Germany and France where rapacious property development is controlled... landlords still make money and do ok out of it but they don't succumb to a level of greed in which only multinationals can survive and are allowed to swallow up communities. Property developers and chain stores seek only to pay dividends to their shareholders... they do not invest in local communities... they suck as much profit out of the area as possible."


Dulwich Estates have had 3 pubs which are all closed - losing them money and us the opportunity to use the pubs. They have just allowed the 7th hairdressers in the area to open. Traders are facing massive rent hikes that are based on 'what the market will bear' rather than a considered long term strategies. Those they rent to talk of difficulties in getting answers from Dulwich Estates.


This all smacks to me of incompetence rather than greed - or as well as. Its probably time to shine a light on this rather cosy and old fashioned charity. What is required for it to have it charitable status and are they fulfilling all of these requirements? What are their strategic plans for the area?


We should ask these questions of any large business that had such an impact on us. I would welcome their attendance at any of the community meetings to give us an opportunity to discuss these points with them.


They have been rather silent on all of these points with the exception of publishing personal correspondence re rent with them and Just Williams on this forum, something I consider to be deeply unprofessional

blimeyoreilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> They have been rather silent on all of these points with the exception of publishing personal

> correspondence re rent with them and Just Williams on this forum, something I consider to be deeply

> unprofessional


That's not correct, unless there is more than the single letter on the other thread. They went out of their way to NOT published personal correspondence - they just showed the parameters under which the rental rates are determined and confirmed these were kept to.

And the children, the young customers of Just Williams, are so heartbroken by the closure of their beloved toyshop, that they are going to stage a protest on Saturday 30th January. Dylan, six, said: ?I feel sad because Just Williams is my favourite toy shop and I like it in its old place.? Jemima, 11, said: ?I don?t want Just Williams to go. It?s magic, and I just love buying my toys from there and seeing all the other kids there as well.?


What next?

Charles Notice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And the children, the young customers of Just

> Williams, are so heartbroken by the closure of

> their beloved toyshop, that they are going to

> stage a protest on Saturday 30th January. Dylan,

> six, said: ?I feel sad because Just Williams is my

> favourite toy shop and I like it in its old

> place.? Jemima, 11, said: ?I don?t want Just

> Williams to go. It?s magic, and I just love buying

> my toys from there and seeing all the other kids

> there as well.?

>

> What next?



I'm sure Jemima will get over it once she realises that her pocket money will go further on Amazon.

Its worth reading the full article on the Herne Hill forum about this rather than this snapshot quote - http://www.hernehill.org.uk/news/herne-hill-cross-roads I think the point is that its the independent shops, such as Just Williams, that are closing due to 70% rent hikes imposed by Dulwich Estates a local charity. And Just Williams aren't the only ones that might close, not just in Herne Hill but in West Dulwich as well. These have contributed to making the area we all live in the way it is now. I'd hate for our High Street to become a MacHighSt with big chains because of a 70% rent hike that pushes the rental costs of these shops beyond their market value. We all know that profits need to be made, but its about balance, and being reasonable. Dulwich Estates currently own 3 of the key pubs in our area that are all closed due to delays in their decision-making etc. And yes of course there are bigger issues, and children are starving, which are also really important, if not more so, but its worth trying to campaign for both - local and bigger issues. Who hasn't on this forum ever bought something from a local supplier? Who hasn't benefited from some of the great local activities organised by local people such as street parties and festivals? Once the local independent shops have gone, we won't have that choice anymore.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OOOOooooOOOooohhhHHHHHH 👜 👜 👜 
    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...