Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What's that phrase, "first world problems"?

>

> Some kids both home and abroad are starving and

> would be happy to just have a hot meal. I find it

> difficult to sympathise, sorry!

>

> Louisa.


Louisa, you could say that for a million topics that appear on the forum. It's a local forum, so we talk about local things. And we're in the first world. We can't spend 24 hours a day weeping over all the suffering in the world.

KateA69 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And yes of course there are

> bigger issues, and children are starving, which

> are also really important, if not more so,


Definitely more so...


The hike was less than that according to the Dulwich Estate and represents a change in market rents since 2010. The equivalent annual increase was just under 5%. I get that might be higher than the shop can afford but unless there is evidence that isn't the current market rate, the charity has a fiduciary responsibility to charge the market rate.

Not sure which evidence you are requesting? If its the 70% proposed rent hike its worth reading Vicky the owner of Just Williams response to Dulwich Estates statement - http://www.hernehill.org.uk/70-rent-increase-dulwich-estates-has-driven-out-just-williams#new - I have also seen the email trail between Vicky and Dulwich Estates where the 70% is proposed, and her response.

"After trying to reason with him, he told us if we couldn?t pay, he could find someone who could which basically tells us that he doesn?t care about our livelihood or the local community."


That's pretty much the rub.



"Can they really be allowed to ruin so many independent businesses and form the neighbourhood as they please?"



This is just what happens and has always happened. Little shops open, people with money are attracted to an area, people without money are priced out of the area, landlords see all the people with money and get greedy, all the things that attracted the money to the area go and are replaced by larger and wealthier businesses.


It's not right or fair, but it is how it is.

At least they have a shop in Goose Green, which will benefit from extra foot fall and increased sales if this shop decides to close.


So their costs as a chain for want of a better word will decrease resulting in greater profits.


Landlords provide the facilities to trade which one can accept or decline.

The bit that annoys me about this is the idea that a pre-existing shop has a permanent right to trade in an area. What about a new entrepreneur who wants to have a go and is confident (rightly or wrongly) that they can afford to pay a higher rent get that opportunity.


I am actually sympathetic to small business owners struggling to keep their business going but so much of the press on this has been manipulative that its turned me off to this shops cause.

Hi John K, sorry for slow response, I thought I'd responded yesterday. Take a look at what Bon Velo the local cycle shop posted on the Herne Hill forum regarding a rent hike thats being imposed on them http://www.hernehill.org.uk/news/bon-velo-and-why-independents-are-being-priced-out-area
Having spoken to about 30 retailers today in Herne Hill they are all concerned about their livelihoods. Just Williams isn't just about the kids, its about the whole community, and people's livelihoods, their jobs. It takes a huge amount of guts, innovation to run your own business. So to totally focus on yummy mummy comments is to belittle the issue. Sure profits have to be made, but its about being reasonable and balanced. Do we really all want a community taken over by the big profiteering companies, that drive out the very shops that drew us to these great places we all live in. What happens when not only these shops go, but some of the essential shops, such as the local laundrette, for those that don't have their own washing machine, the local garage to fix cars, the local shoe mender - where we will get this stuff done - or are we looking at the next level of socio-economic cleansing? Using the kids as an excuse to switch-off frankly doesn't cut it as a reason to switch-off from this campaign when its people's jobs at stake. Everyone has a right to express an opinion, whether they are adults or children, and good on them for learning to speak out now when they are young, and not focus on more petty issues and become cynical adults.

KateA69 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Having spoken to about 30 retailers today in Herne

> Hill they are all concerned about their

> livelihoods. Just Williams isn't just about the

> kids, its about the whole community, and people's

> livelihoods, their jobs. It takes a huge amount

> of guts, innovation to run your own business. So

> to totally focus on yummy mummy comments is to

> belittle the issue. Sure profits have to be made,

> but its about being reasonable and balanced. Do

> we really all want a community taken over by the

> big profiteering companies, that drive out the

> very shops that drew us to these great places we

> all live in. What happens when not only these

> shops go, but some of the essential shops, such as

> the local laundrette, for those that don't have

> their own washing machine, the local garage to fix

> cars, the local shoe mender - where we will get

> this stuff done - or are we looking at the next

> level of socio-economic cleansing? Using the kids

> as an excuse to switch-off frankly doesn't cut it

> as a reason to switch-off from this campaign when

> its people's jobs at stake. Everyone has a right

> to express an opinion, whether they are adults or

> children, and good on them for learning to speak

> out now when they are young, and not focus on more

> petty issues and become cynical adults.


Agree. There's something childish about the 'have a pop at the toffs' tone of some of these comments. Tiresome.

Dulwich Estate is their landlord as I read it. They even mention the chief exec of DE by name



edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I had read this and either the piece is badly

> written or I got confused.

>

> Are Bon Velo (odd number) stating that Dulwich

> College Estate is its landlord?

>

> John K

KateA69 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Coverage in today's Evening Standard -

> http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/protest-marc

> h-in-herne-hill-as-businesses-hit-by-70-per-cent-r

> ent-hike-a3167921.html

>

> BBC London news planning to come down tomorrow as

> well.



Will they be mentioning the other shops they have?


And will they mention how long the old rent was in place for and new rents in the area.


Tugging at the heartstrings too much.

A petition calling for it to charge ?reasonable? rents has gained thousands of signatures, as well as backing from celebrities including Channel 4 newsreader Cathy Newman. She tweeted a picture of the Just Williams toy shop, which is closing after 10 years, saying: ?Much-loved local toy shop shut down after astronomical rent rises. Kids gutted. #greedylandlords.?


Why would Cathy Newman appear. Is it the trial by media mob calling on favours?


Does she live local.


Whole thing leaves a lot to be desired.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...