Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Peckham is Peckham. Estate agent drivel to re-brand existing neighborhoods with ridiculous names is a way of encouraging gentrification and super house price inflation. It sub divides communities unnecessarily. The short walk between Bellenden RD and Rye Lane may as well be a 8 hour flight from Heathrow. 20/30 years ago that was not the case. So yes, Bell End Village is more appropriate in my eyes.


Louisa.

Agreed. Talk about lowering the tone.


ed_pete Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Peckham is Peckham.

>

> Then call it Peckham - no need to be rude about

> it.

I'm kind of OK with Bellenden Rd and the streets off it to be referred to as "Bellenden".. but "Village" is daft!


The Wikipedia entry made me giggle : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellenden_Road

Bellenden is claimed to be distinct from any of its surrounding neighbours for a number of reasons (largely those trying to justify why they spent over 600K in Peckham)

Dulwich Village is a historical name. This was a village long before London consumed it. Bellenden Village is a made up thing by estate agents to make posh 'do me uppers' feel good about the fact they invested in an otherwise shit area (in their eyes).


Louisa.

I love Peckham, I grew up there. I do think it needs an overhaul and tidy up, and that process is in motion right now so let's see what happens. Rye Lane is shit yeah, awful in fact. What I find patronising is estate agents giving areas these made up names for one purpose and one purpose only. It's annoying.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I love Peckham, I grew up there. I do think it

> needs an overhaul and tidy up, and that process is

> in motion right now so let's see what happens. Rye

> Lane is shit yeah, awful in fact. What I find

> patronising is estate agents giving areas these

> made up names for one purpose and one purpose

> only. It's annoying.

>

> Louisa.


Graffiti on the front of John the Unicorn this morning


"John the Yuppiecorn"

I'm prepared to give any business a chance. 'John the Unicorn' is brought to Peckham by the same owners of EDT so I'm thankful for a new boozer locally and wish it every success. Whether it's my 'cup of tea' is another matter, of course.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm prepared to give any business a chance. 'John

> the Unicorn' is brought to Peckham by the same

> owners of EDT so I'm thankful for a new boozer

> locally and wish it every success. Whether it's my

> 'cup of tea' is another matter, of course.

>

> Louisa.


Well there are plenty of people living in Peckham but will John The Unicorn ever be a destination pub.


Foxy

Interesting point foxy. It's certainly in a good location and will re-direct and possibly increase footfall from the starion up Rye Lane of an evening. Particularly so as a few doors along from here a new chain restaurant is set to open this year, 'Turtle Bay', which will give people a reason to head in this direction. Let's just hope this all inclusive a deep clean of the streets in front of these places.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The consultation advertised as being last night Tuesday 18th, and to which our Councillor Renata Hamvas told me she was unable to attend, never happened because Events Team and Gala never showed up at Pod 1 Peckham Library. Cllr Hamvas is not supporting the 2nd weekend.  I then noticed in Southwark News the meeting is scheduled for tonight Wednesday 19th Nov 2025.  I can't attend. CllrVictoria Mills doesn't reply to my emails. Anyone able to go? I am unable to leave the house at this time. 
    • Just received this email: You’re receiving this email because you signed the petition: “Limit the sale of fireworks to those running local council approved events only”. The Government has responded to the petition you signed – “Limit the sale of fireworks to those running local council approved events only”. Government responded: The Government recognises the negative impact fireworks can have on some people and animals. However, when used responsibly they are a source of enjoyment for many people. The Government’s intention is to minimise the negative impact of fireworks and to support their considerate use, while reducing the risks and disturbances to individuals, animals, and property. The majority of individuals who use fireworks do so in a responsible and safe manner and there are enforcement mechanisms in place to tackle situations when fireworks are misused. At this point in time the Government does not have any plans to ban the sale of fireworks to consumers. We have launched a fireworks campaign for this fireworks season to provide guidance on minimising the impacts of fireworks on animal welfare and encouraging responsible use. Lower noise fireworks are promoted in the campaign alongside encouraging people to consider going to a public display. Public displays are more likely to be well-publicised, providing people with an opportunity to prepare ahead of the display taking place. The campaign also includes new guidance for those running community fireworks events, and social media posts that emphasise the risks from the misuse of fireworks. This supplements existing guidance from Government and other organisations that is available to help people to use fireworks safely and appropriately. My safety: fireworks - GOV.UK (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/my-safety-fireworks) Organising non-professional fireworks displays - GOV.UK (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/organising-non-professional-fireworks-displays) A regulatory framework currently controls the sale, availability, and use of fireworks to consumers. For example, there is an 11pm curfew in place for the use of fireworks, with later exceptions only for the traditional firework periods of November 5th, Diwali, New Year’s Eve and the Chinese New Year. Using fireworks outside the curfew hours is a criminal offence enforced by the police and can lead to imprisonment and a substantial fine. There is also a maximum noise level of 120 decibels with many retailers also offering ‘lower noise’ and ‘no bang’ fireworks. A number of animal welfare organisations, along with industry and local authorities, provide advice and guidance to enable people to minimise the negative impacts of fireworks on people, animals and our communities. We work closely with these organisations to amplify this messaging in the run up to, and during, key dates when fireworks are commonly used.  To inform any future action the Government will continue to engage with businesses, consumer groups and charities to gather evidence on the issues with and impacts of fireworks. Department for Business and Trade Click this link to view the response online: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/732559?reveal_response=yes This petition has over 100,000 signatures. The Petitions Committee will consider it for a debate. They can also gather further evidence and press the government for action. The Committee is made up of 11 MPs, from political parties in government and in opposition. It is entirely independent of the Government. Find out more about the Committee: https://petition.parliament.uk/help#petitions-committee Thanks, The Petitions Team House of Commons
    • Peachy Goat in Herne Hill is being replaced by Mino. The space is being redecorated.
    • Hi - Have you seen the photo in nivag's post 'Lost cat at Dulwich Hamlet FC'? It looks as if it could be Gigi (assuming she's still missing).
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...