Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The more 'feral' elements of our press love to berate perceived political correctness in all its forms.


I personally don't really think that the term has any real value - everything is political and things are either correct or incorrect. Furthermore I would dismiss the idea that identifying things as being politically correct somehow undermines their validity.


Has anyone got any real life examples of 'political correctness gone mad' that they think validate the case for applying the term or can we just condemn 'PC' to room 101?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/918-political-correctness-gone-mad/
Share on other sites

but did pc not come about in order to stop people slagging off people in wheelchairs, making jokes about race or religion etc. Is it not the case that pc can equate to consideration for others. In which case it is a good thing, however I do agree that it is an overused term and is somehow seen as derogatory

I just don't see why they need to call general equality political correctness. It's a stupid term.


As for the PC gone mad thing, I can see why people get p!ssed off if they work in the public sector, as you get some really really stupid people being paid a lot of money to come up with social and work inclusion and equality plans, which make no sense to anyone despite colour or creed!

I think it's much more complicated than that. I hate it when people like Littlejohn and his ilk use it to rebuff any attempt to be fair and tackle discrimination. Thank God we are not still living in the racist, sexist, homophobic 70s.


But I think it's also fair to say that political correctness has a lot to answer for. If you look at the ideas behind communism they were quite noble, high-minded and unlike the corrupt reality they became. In a similar way political correctness started out as a way of getting people to understand how language can entrench prejudice and social divisions. Quite true. But it has now become a dogma whereby people communicate in a kind of doublespeak reminiscent of Orwell's "newspeak". Rather than helping society to be fair to all races and minorities, it increases the gap between what people say and what they actually believe. It breeds resentment because it papers over untruths with other untruths.

This is very topical in the light of Bernard Manning's demise:


http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/marcus_brigstocke/2007/06/surplus_manning.html


I take your point about Newspeak. It is true that the acceptable terms used to address race for example are constantly changing and I feel sorry for people who are chastised for using the term 'coloured' which causes the offence they are quite clearly trying to avoid. If you're not up to date with the language then you are labelled racist.


I agree that there is an element of tyranny to it too in that people are told what they can and can't say rather than fully educated as to the reasons why they can and can't say things. That said I believe a tyranical culture of tolerance is preferable to allowing intolerance to spread.


The problem is that the people in a position to bridge the gap are our 'feral' media who have no interest beyond increasing their readership. They are more likely to put a crow bar into the cracks you mentioned.


TB's legacy speech made a lot of references to his role in promoting the now dominant culture of tolerance. I think he does deserve some credit.

Well said James. Unfortunately there are still certain loathsome people like the aforementioned Richard Littlejohn (Smallprick?) in the Sun who are still living in the 70s and then you have newspapers like the Daily Mail and the Express who are still living in the 1950s FFS, spreading their vile prejudices.

Agreed. And it is Britain's second biggest selling daily.


In actual fact some of the opinions and beliefs that may be taken as axioms on the East Dulwich Forum are considered offensive to large swathes of Britain.


I will never move out of London. Imagine drinking in a pub surrounded by people who are terrified of paedophiles and immigrants despite never having encountered either. Never again.

Keef - seriously? Never read the Daily Mail before? Lucky you, but the shock must have been immense


As for PC - I would say that 9/10 times when the usual suspects start banging on about PC gone mad there is no substance to any of the argument. Schools and councils don't ban Christmas for fear of upsetting Muslims. The EU didn't ban bendy bananas. And so on... So before we go down the pro/anti PC argument can people come up with some genuine instances of "PC gone mad?"

Actually Sean, I'm pretty sure Lambeth did ban Christmas lights a couple of years back for just that reason (well not just Muslims, but non christians).


I have a colleague who I'm pretty sure actually reads the Mail, and PC gone mad is one of his favourite subjects... He is really funny though, so I don't mind too much >:D<


RE The villages... I was in a pub in Winchelsea (near Rye) a couple of weeks back, and the locals at the bar were discussing the introduction of recycling in the area. They were not happy about it I can tell you!

Christmas lights are not allowed to be so called. They are Festive Lights. Come on you guys, get with the PC programme.


We should not say ...man, as in postman, fireman, policeman. We should use the word bod instead. Its non-gender specific and will promote equality. We get postbods, policebods and we take our complaints to the ombudsbod!


citizen

"a tyranical culture of tolerance is preferable to allowing intolerance to spread"


I sort of agree with this. But then the problem becomes how is this "tolerance" defined and by whom? The Guardian-reading elite? (I speak as a guardian-reader btw!)


However I think the PC culture has made notable advances. For example the Sun now portrays black people positively (although it has switched to other targets like immigrants and travellers and "mad mullahs"). We are also getting far less of the "GAY AFFAIR! UGH! A POLITICIAN IS GAY! AAAAAAGH! DISGUSTING!" type headlines. I think they realise that public opinion has shifted so they just can't get away with this kind of bullying any more.


Interesting that the rightwing press - like the major Western religions - repeatedly lag behind society in intolerance and prejudice. Every now and then they get a kick up the arse and move forward a bit. It wasn't that long ago that the Telegraph was sympathising with the Nazis (but they like to forget that now).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As it turned out after my post, the police have photos. And even if they didn't, the OP reported the incident to the police, who would have asked for a description.  However there are all sorts of problems with eye witness descriptions, which would just be multiplied with several kids involved. I stand by my post. Are you suggesting a full description of these kids should be posted on here so that ... what?  Vigilante action by forum members? And if there was mistaken identity? Then what? Even if there wasn't, there could be all sorts of background issues relating to this sort of anti social behaviour. It should be left to the police to find and  appropriately deal with  the perpetrators of criminal behaviour. The police are far from perfect, but the alternative just makes a general slide into lawlessness more likely.
    • Hi there, we’re on Rodwell Road and need some large + medium moving boxes - please message if you’re trying to get rid of some, we can collect. 
    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...