Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm interested in the idea of a nanny share for 2 one year olds. However before I go any further I'd really like to get an idea of approximate costs in this area (East Dulwich / Herne Hill / West Dulwich) so I know whether it is really an option for me. Is anybody willing to reveal what it would cost per week?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9338-nanny-share-idea-of-costs/
Share on other sites

It does depend a bit on the nanny's tax code etc but as a rough estimate, a nanny's net hourly rate if looking after children of two families will be around ?10-11.50 (if well qualified nannies,good references etc) per hour and then you have to pay their tax and NI on top so it works out it works out to about ?7-?7.50 an hour per family (that's when split between just two families)

Remember to factor in the cost of Ofsted registration and nanny payroll services, the latter are about ?10 a month and I think Ofsted is ?100, but not sure how often that crops up (I think yearly - although you could write into the contract that they are responsible for their own registration costs). Also think about the initial outlay for double buggies or any other equipment you need.


For sole charge of one child at about ?7.50 (net) an hour, for a 10 hour day, I would bank on it costing you around ?100 all in per day. Yikes. If you're sharing, you can get that down to ?60 pretty easily, maybe as low as ?55. I think it's a good idea to set expectations regarding salary reviews at the start, as some nannies will expect annual raises as a matter of course (and if your own salary is likely to be static, it may not be realistic).

Yes, I think that's realistic. You should be able to get a decent nanny for that, as long as you're not expecting mega-long days (I think the norm is around 10 hours).


Re: holidays, most nannies will get the statutory minimum (I think 22 days), which can include Bank Holidays. You'll need to arrange a plan for deciding when holidays can be taken, as it's a bit of a juggling act in my experience to make sure the nanny and both families get to take at least some of their holidays at a time that suits them.


You need to think about sick pay as well - your payroll service provider can advise you on that. If you end up having to take holiday or unpaid leave when your childcare falls through, it can be a big 'hidden cost'.

Hi


I've just started interviewing for a nanny position and I'm finding that the more experienced ones seem to charge ?10 ph but they are registered as self employed and do their own tax and N.I. This is for 2 sibblings, so it could be more expensive for a nanny share, 2 families (although ?14 ph above seems alot!) But does anyone know if I still have to pay sick pay to a self employed nanny? I guess this can be negotiated? I didn't have to pay my self employed childminder any sick pay when she or her child were ill, but some childminders insist on it. I would like to limit it to a maximum number of days sick pay per year. Anyone have any thoughts?

The statutory minimum is now 28 days, but this can include 8 bank holidays.


Nannys are not self-employed, even if they set up a limited company etc. For tax and employment rights purposes they meet the legal definition of employees, so families are the employer and responsible for statutory sick pay, maternity pay etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...