Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Get a life.



But jimmy two times, this is my life (*fights desperately hard to curb pissing herself laughing*)...I tell you what...here you go...so you don't feel left out:


http://www.scoutscan.com/cubs/morsecode.html


*now doubled up in pain - laughing*

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9383-ibuprofen/#findComment-281751
Share on other sites

Doubled up in pain. You need ibruprofen you do.

34p for 16 tablets. All major supermarkets and pharmacy chains sell them.

No need for fancy branded companies and added extras.

A study* showed men find the expensive dressed up branded ones worked best.

Women said they did not.


*I saw a documentary on telly about it so it must be true.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9383-ibuprofen/#findComment-281765
Share on other sites

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Doubled up in pain. You need ibruprofen you do.

> 34p for 16 tablets.



STOP IT!!! Please! (*clutches stomach*)


At this rate I'll be on morphine before long!


Oh dearie me...(*wipes streaming tears from face*)...oh lawdie lawdie...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9383-ibuprofen/#findComment-281814
Share on other sites

I am told you should not take ibruprofen if you have asthma or lung problems, but it's fine with me.

So when I am asked at the counter I say I do not have asthma or they won't sell it me.

People think all asthmatics are allergic to cats, though. So there's no telling some people.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9383-ibuprofen/#findComment-283054
Share on other sites

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am told you should not take ibruprofen if you

> have asthma or lung problems, but it's fine with

> me.

> So when I am asked at the counter I say I do not

> have asthma or they won't sell it me.

> People think all asthmatics are allergic to cats,

> though. So there's no telling some people.

________________________________________________________


PR


It only applies to around 10% of us wheezers ( I am one but in denial )


Bring on the cheap pink ones




W**F

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9383-ibuprofen/#findComment-283171
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...