Jump to content

Recommended Posts

With all this legal knowledge and certainty that they have the law on their side, why haven't SSW been able to make anything stick? The council were discriminating, the council isn't abiding by planning permission, and so on.

UPDATE


The tree cutters are on One Tree Hill. Photos attached.


Blanche Cameron

Friends of Camberwell Cemeteries / Save Southwark Woods Campaign

07731 304 966 [email protected]

[www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk]

Twitter: @southwarkwoods Facebook: Save Southwark Woods

Another photo. You can see trees on One Tree Hill Nature Reserve in this photo.


Blanche Cameron

Friends of Camberwell Cemeteries / Save Southwark Woods Campaign

07731 304 966 [email protected]

[www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk]

Twitter: @southwarkwoods Facebook: Save Southwark Woods

What you mean is that the tree cutters are in Camberwell New Cemetery on the ground ADJACENT to One Tree Hill, NOT actually ON One Tree Hill, why can't you just be honest, with out distorting the facts?


Re: nesting birds, ssw played that card last year as well, so no surprise they are using it again, and by the way ssw what happened to the racial discrimination you were shouting about and oh then their was the issue of WW1 garves, both quickly forgotten by ssw now they have nesting birds, really so are so predictable. Your group is a bit like a magpie, picking the silver object of the moment before moving onto something else.

There are perhaps a couple of things worth noting. The first is that the general legislation bars the disturbance of 'nesting birds'. It sets out no dates for this, and indeed different birds will nest at different times at different latitudes (and indeed depending on local climate). Southwark Council well may have 'rule of thumb' guidance as to dates - thereby precluding normal working during those times. However, because of the interference of ssw there have been hold-ups in their plans, and there is nothing, in law, to stop their work where there are no nesting birds to be disturbed. [indeed, and as an additional issue, I believe that where there are safety issues regarding the state of the tree the 'nesting bird' rule can be ignored, not least because a tree collapse in itself would somewhat disturb the birds.]


As to the timing condition placed on the work - as I have said, there is no legal definition of 'bird nesting season' - there are accepted windows certainly, but without the weight of law - so I believe such a condition, though I am sure entirely worthy - is also entirely challengeable as having no actual meaning in law. So long as Southwark can demonstrate that they have checked for nesting birds (and not found any where they are working) they can argue that it is not 'bird nesting season' where they are active. The underlying law, as I have said, is about the disturbance of nesting birds, and is not date related.

Photo attached:


Wood chips from oak trees, cut down on the side of One Tree Hill in the Camberwell New Cemetery grounds, adjacent to the One Tree Hill Nature Reserve and the One Tree Hill Allotments. Some of the trees in the distance are on the Nature Reserve land.


This land is being prepared for 122 burial spaces - or seven or eight months supply.

"Wood chips from oak trees, cut down on the side of One Tree Hill in the Camberwell New Cemetery grounds, adjacent to the One Tree Hill Nature Reserve and the One Tree Hill Allotments". So for once Blanche and co of ssw actually do listen, well that's a first for them.
It's good to see the chips there - presumably some sort of mulch. Seems a good deal for two-thirds of a year usage. Remembering how much value the relatives of those lying there will be placing on having a local cemetery to be able to visit. And in a nice setting. Do remember that graveyards may contain the dead, but they are there for the living. Hence the somewhat lack of tragedy when the dead that have been buried so long they have no living relatives or friends are 'moved' in one way or another to make way for a further generation of interments.

Tree Cutting continues today on One Tree Hill, next to the One Tree Allotments and the One Tree Hill Nature Reserve.


Blanche Cameron

Friends of Camberwell Cemeteries / Save Southwark Woods Campaign

07731 304 966 [email protected]

[www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk]

Twitter: @southwarkwoods Facebook: Save Southwark Woods

taper Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's nothing. They retweeted a very unpleasant

> anti-Semite the other day.

>

> https://twitter.com/caterhamcr3/status/84233493572

> 1644032



Oh dear oh dear oh dear.



Much as I find these threads quite ammusing, I actually find SSW pretty offensive. Completely dishonest and incapable of proper debate.

Statement:


Felling trees on One Tree Hill in bird nesting season proves Southwark not fit to run burial service

22nd March 2017


Southwark's planning application categorically promised ?No felling is to take place in bird nesting season? (Area D1 Design & Access Statement, para 3.2.13). But Southwark starting felling on Friday 10th March without an ecologist on site to ensure no bat roosts or nesting birds were disturbed.


Why the rush to move forward on such a destructive project? Southwark says these 122 burial plots are needed to stop Southwark from ?running out? of burial space.


But something is very wrong if - almost 20 years into their permanent ?burial crisis? - Southwark needs 122 plots immediately or in-borough burial will stop.


Read it all. http://www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk/not-fit-to-run-burial-service/4593750633


Blanche Cameron

Friends of Camberwell Cemeteries / Save Southwark Woods Campaign

07731 304 966 [email protected]

[www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk]

Twitter: @southwarkwoods Facebook: Save Southwark Woods


Friends of Camberwell Cemeteries was founded as Save Southwark Woods to stop the destruction of the woods and graves of Camberwell Old and New Cemeteries.

We are for maintaining recreational activities already taking place on cemetery grounds, such as the Recreation Ground and the Allotments.

We are for preserving the cemeteries as Memorial Park Nature Reserves, like Nunhead or Highgate Cemeteries.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are Blanche and Lewis definitely two separate

> people?

>

> I'd ask Blanche directly, but she doesn't respond

> to anyone, she just continues to past nonsense as

> if the rest of the thread isn't happening.


They definitely are. I know this because Lewis shouted at me and threatened me when I questioned SSW's vision for the cemetery, while Blanche stood behind him meekly and then justified his behaviour.


It was pretty hilarious, looking back.

We have responded to Cllr Wingfield's denial that Southwark's burial policy is discriminatory.


"Cllr Wingfield appears to be claiming that all Muslim residents could be buried in Southwark - if only they changed their religious burial rites. This is clearly discriminatory.


He states ?we have a dedicated Muslim burial area which has space for 48 grave plots?.


The ONS reports around 9 deaths per 1,000 per year, meaning Southwark?s 30,000 Muslim residents experience approximately 270 deaths a year. Southwark buries 7 Muslims"


To read more: http://www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk/council-burial-discrimination/4593751887


Religious discrimination in burial provision is just one reason why burial cannot continue in Southwark's cemeteries.


Blanche Cameron

Friends of Camberwell Cemeteries / Save Southwark Woods Campaign

07731 304 966 [email protected]

[www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk]

Twitter: @southwarkwoods Facebook: Save Southwark Woods


Friends of Camberwell Cemeteries was founded as Save Southwark Woods in January 2015 to stop the destruction of the woods and graves of Camberwell Old and New Cemeteries.

We are for maintaining recreational activities already taking place on cemetery grounds, such as the Recreation Ground and the Allotments.

We are for preserving the cemeteries as Memorial Park Nature Reserves, like Nunhead or Highgate Cemeteries.

Normally @savesouthwarkwoods RTs all praise and support in double quick time - nearly three hours ago UKIP posted their support in the London Assembly for the group and yet they haven't acknowledged it; any reason? Considering news updates are coming in almost daily from Blanche and Lewis I can't see why their case being heard in the London Assembly wouldn't get promoted and sent to the papers, Private Eye, Bianca Jagger, etc.


https://twitter.com/UKIP_Assembly/status/844531695328120834

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...