Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Copy of Message.


Re: Getting Old?

Posted by: Ladymuck January 17, 10:59PM



katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think I have been gullible where computedshorty

> is concerned...



Don't worry about it...you are not the only only...believe me! (*looks highly embarrassed*)


Just expect him/her/it to morph into something/someone else...humour him/her/it and enjoy the ride...it's all good clean fun...(I think)...

computedshorty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Copy of Message.

>

> Re: Getting Old?

> Posted by: Ladymuck January 17, 10:59PM

>

>

> katie1997 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think I have been gullible where

> computedshorty

> > is concerned...

>

>

> Don't worry about it...you are not the only

> only...believe me! (*looks highly embarrassed*)

>

> Just expect him/her/it to morph into

> something/someone else...humour him/her/it and

> enjoy the ride...it's all good clean fun...(I

> think)...


Blimey CS...that was a completely different thread...a very jokey one...what on earth has happened to that unique and quirky sense of humour of yours? Sincere apologies for any offence caused.


As for this thread, I was actually sticking up for you...can't you see that? Well, let that be a lesson learnt to me.

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brum drive safely and don't be looking into any

> passing cars.


Thanks K - tho nothing more to report on the naughtiness in cars topic so far - and thanks LM for standing in for my first 100 (*tips hat in your general direction*)

It's worth keeping in mind that whilst this forum discusses everyday and real issues and friendships are made, a great deal of the content (arguing, throwing silly comments at each other etc) should be remembered as not real. Many of things said on here would not be said face to face and for those few that have a vicious tongue (of which offends) in person are not people you would associate yourself with so don't bother too much over silly nastiness :)

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's worth keeping in mind that whilst this forum

> discusses everyday and real issues and friendships

> are made, a great deal of the content (arguing,

> throwing silly comments at each other etc) should

> be remembered as not real. Many of things said on

> here would not be said face to face and for those

> few that have a vicious tongue (of which offends)

> in person are not people you would associate

> yourself with so don't bother too much over silly

> nastiness :)

_____________________________________________________________________



Oh....



Please be assured that, I am as kind and smooth tongued in real life, as I am on here



Yes I f*%kin am




W**F

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> You're not reading the forum whilst driving down

> the motorway, I hope?



Fortunately, my iPhone can drive my car whilst I send posts and simultaneously voyeurise my fellow road users.....damn clever, those iPhones!

There's actually an app for locating eligible singles, which, last I heard, is available now for same-sex and available for hetros in the near future. Your i-Phone uses GPS to locate the nearest available person (who also uses the app) in a bar, or wherever. Their photo pops up on your phone to help you find them. Or did I just imagine all this??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...