Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am probably very late to this, but I see that the redevelopment of peckham rye station has been approved: http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=details&keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9563201


Maybe I can't read the drawings correctly, but I couldn't see plans to make the station handicap accessible. That can't be correct, is it?

LD929 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am probably very late to this, but I see that

> the redevelopment of peckham rye station has been

> approved:

> http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-appl

> ications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=details&k

> eyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9563201

>

> Maybe I can't read the drawings correctly, but I

> couldn't see plans to make the station handicap

> accessible. That can't be correct, is it?


Shouldn't that be 'disabled access' as noted in the Equality Act 2010 (formerly the Disability Discrimination Act 1995).

LD929 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am probably very late to this, but I see that

> the redevelopment of peckham rye station has been

> approved. Maybe I can't read the drawings correctly, but I

> couldn't see plans to make the station handicap

> accessible. That can't be correct, is it?


You're right. It's not there. This is the result of one of many sleights of hand from the Council to recover from their disastrous approach to the station site planning during 2012/13 which led to the notorious Weston Williamson plan to demolish everything and build 5-7 storey housing blocks and clear out all the businesses alongside and behind the station at once: http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Peckham_Rye_Station_Gateway/Jan-Sep_2014#Network_Rail_plans_reveal_total_demolition_18th_January_2014

They then said they would 'codesign' it with local people (just before the 2014 local elections). But then two years of obfuscation since then has resulted in a plan for the new square being approved with no relationship to all the other integral parts of it - this includes step free access for the station, and design of the public realm in the immediately adjoining streets! All objections that the details of the related parts of the station site had to be part of a whole have been brushed aside by the Council to give planning permission. All the other parts are probably being dealt with behind the scenes but in spite of the promise to 'codesign' the station site, no one knows anything. How well they fit together or when remains to be seen. This is how the Planning system operates now unfortunately.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Did you try the emergency number posted above? It mentions lift breakdowns over the festive period outside the advertises times. Hope you got it sorted x
    • People working in shops should not be "attempting to do the bill in their head." Nor if questioned should they be  trying to "get to an agreeable number." They should be actually (not trying to) getting to the correct number. I'm afraid in many cases it is clearly more than incorrect arithmetic. One New Year's Eve in a restaurant (not in East Dulwich but quite near it) two of us were charged for thirty poppadoms. We were quite merry when the bill came, but not so merry as to not notice something amiss. Unfortunately we have had similar things happen in a well established East Dulwich restaurant we no longer use. There is also a shop in East Dulwich which is open late at night. It used not to display prices on its goods (that may have changed). On querying the bill, we several times found a mistake had been made. Once we were charged twice for the same goods. There is a limit to how many times you can accept a "mistake".  There is also a limit to how many times you can accept the "friendly" sweet talking after it.
    • Adapted not forced.  As have numerous species around the world.  Sort of thing that Attenborough features.  Domestic dogs another good example - hung around communities for food and then we become the leader of the pack.  Not sure how long it will take foxes to domesticate, but some will be well on their way.    Raccoons also on the way https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1j8j48e5z2o
    • My memory, admittedly not very reliable these days, places the shop on the block on the left hand side just before Burgess Park going towards Camberwell. Have also found a reference to Franklins Antiques being located at 157 Camberwell Road which is on that block. This is a screen shot obtained from Google maps of that address which accords with my memory except the entrance door was on the right hand side, where the grey door is, rather than in the centre.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...