Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know there are some much more serious threads on here right now - but I just have to vent about a Council leaflet dropper's rudeness this morning. As I was negotiating leaving the house this morning with our newborn and toddler, said leaflet dropper pushed passed us in the doorway - entered our house and dropped leaflets in our hallway. When I said 'excuse me that's unbelieveably rude!' he just said 'Whatever'.


Ironically one of the leaflets he dropped was called WHTVR - which I believe means the same (so not my demographic!).

The other was called something like 'Investing in you'. Maybe Southwark Council should invest in some considerate leaflet dropper - or market research into who is in their properties.


Or is this a new type of Guerilla marketing, which I've fallen for, as I'm now talking about this on the forum?


Either way - I'm gobsmacked at the home invasion!

Thinking about it ryedalema, although a bit clumsy and ill-mannered you could say your leaflet dropper was doing his job too well. His job is to make sure the leaflets are delivered into your home and he obviously took his responsibilities literally.


If you report him he may well be promoted.

So the leafletter went into your house? As in your hallway, entrance room etc? It wasn't a communal hall way or anything like that in a shared flat it was your house and your private front door? Oh my god! He walked passed you (bumped into you) as you were coming out of YOUR house, entered YOUR house and said whatever when you protested? Unbelivable! If I was you I'd be on the phone to the council ASAP!!

NickW - very strange - you wouldn't happen to be said leafletter would you?

NickW,


I think your comment is way out of order and ryedalema deserves an apology from you for the slander and the personal attack.


As for...'Your comment epitomizes everything that is wrong with East Dulwich', it may help to have a look in the mirror and see what you see.

I feel sorry for the disadvantaged. Problems we encounter in our society are because of all of us. Being snobby and pointing on internet forums does not help. It was not the above post, I read back through all ryedalemas posts and it was as a result of this I was so aggressive. I feel she is a bully.

NickW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I feel sorry for the disadvantaged. Problems we

> encounter in our society are because of all of us.

> Being snobby and pointing on internet forums does

> not help. It was not the above post, I read back

> through all ryedalemas posts and it was as a

> result of this I was so aggressive. I feel she is

> a bully.


xxxxxxxx


I've just looked through her posts and I don't know what you're talking about.


And even if she was a bully, does that give somebody else the right to barge past her and her small children into her own house?

NickW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @ryedalema - you are a neurotic, patronizing, over

> protective mother who is let me guess?.. never

> wrong. Your comment epitomizes everything that is

> wrong with East Dulwich. You have so much and yet

> you still have a go at those that have so little.

> You are self righteous and far more offensive and

> undesirable than the leaflet dropper.



Ouch!

NickW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I feel sorry for the disadvantaged. Problems we

> encounter in our society are because of all of us.

>.


Jeez. Just how patronising is that. You are everything that is wrong with East Dulwich etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It was normal cyclists, in rush hour traffic, in the dark, in the rain. Just really want people to realise it’s that time of year even more careful and to get kitted out.
    • The other consideration is that users of Lime bikes and similar, plus younger pedal cyclists, probably don't view themselves as 'cyclists' as such and so don't get kitted out or even consider that they need to. I also agree that earlier nights are another factor for the casual or hire bike user more used to cycling in the summer. I don't think I have ever seen a hire bike or scooter user wearing a helmet or reflective gear- presumably that is because the bike is just viewed as a transport tool for short term use and users do not want to be encumbered by any of the safety gear? Before anyone jumps on me for anecdotal evidence and speculation, this is just what I have seen round here, there may be hordes of similar users elsewhere that are kitted out.
    • Well apolitical if that is an OK word for you.  Sorry if my choice of words was incorrect.  But on my original point if it wasn't for the Telegraph dragging this up, and yes they do have an agenda, an no they are not apolitical/impartial whatever, we;d be none the wiser. But as it made no difference to Trump's election campaign that why would he have a case in the American courts? Irrespective of the rights and wrongs of the programme
    • If she took a bus, has she tried contacting the bus company? Long shot, but you never know!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...