Jump to content

Petition to Save Fairlawn Nursery


yas

Recommended Posts

sorry i apologise for that. i just assumed those who were attacking our petition were non-parents! it wasn't a generalisation on non-parents!


it would be understandable why some of the non-parents would not want public money being spent on early years education etc.. but not to the point of insulting those who do! so really we are not the bad guys here at all :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you mistake criticism of your methods with criticism of your ends. I don't think anyone (happy to stand corrected on this) has suggested that they would wish to see the nursery closed (other things being equal) - merely that the way you have chosen to go about it (outwith anything you have done before posting notification of this petition) doesn't make a lot of sense. It was as if you had declared a wish to drive from London to Glasgow, but insisted that a route via Brighton, Cardiff, Nantes and Skye would be your optimal choice. Others have suggested otherwise, but that doesn't mean they don't think you shouldn't end up in Glasgow, they just feel the chosen route won't necessarily get you there.


To assume because we disagree with your methods that we are uncaring, childless trolls (pretty much your response on this) is perhaps an assumption too far. By inferring (I would guess wholly wrongly, certainly on my part) that we don't want money spent on early years education, for instance, is in no way relevant or consequent on our arguments that you have petitioned the wrong people, too late and/or have asked a Council to act outwith its legal powers.


Nor on an argument that by spending more on one nursery, given agreed budget heads, the Council would thus have to deprive another nursery. Once councils have agreed budgets these are no longer discretionary spends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Penguin68 you know as well as i do that the future of school nurseries may or may not be secure given the cuts!

As for Fairlawn Nursery, it benefits schools considerably less better off than my son's school. Case in point, Adamsrill, Holy Trinity. So given these facts, you still argue that to hell with it which I find it to be really odd.



As for the petition it may or may not be to late as the nursery due to close in August!


So please don't use this on me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I'm a parent, who also has a long association with Fairlawn. I was very sorry that the decision was made to close the nursery, but the governors carried out a proper consultation process and then took the final decision to close the nursery once the responses to the consultation had been received and considered by the governors. There is no right of appeal against the decision - it was for the governors of the school to make and no other body has any power to make the governors change or reconsider their decision.


The school offered places at Haseltine to parents on the waiting list, and there are other excellent nurseries in the area - I find it hard to believe that Eliot Bank can be too far away for anyone who wanted a place at Fairlawn. Many of the parents on the waiting list will have found other places by now anyway.


Whatever you may want to think, the final decision has been made and will not be changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Growlybear, if you are a parent at Fairlawn then you must understand why Fairlawn had to make that decision! i was present in the first consultation and had long chats with both heads about this issue since. But there are legalities as to what schools can or can't do. Fundraising was explored but frankly you can't run a nursery year in year out relying on fundraising.


no Eliot Bank is absolutely undoable for me so is Hazeltine. I won't send my child to St Francesca (a catholic school), no offence if you did. In any case, I had since sorted a place for my daughter anyhow.


Though stating that this petition is a useless exercise is dishonest! Even if doesn't achieve its ultimate goal, it has provided moral support for the staff at the nursery!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course I understand why the governors had to make the decision to close the nursery. I also understand the process for making such a decision, and am very much aware of the legalities of what schools can and can't do, as well as what the local authority can and can't do. It is not at all dishonest to say that the petition is useless because it will not serve it's original purpose, which was to 'save Fairlawn Nursery'. I also don't think the one or two staff who may or may not be affected by the closure really need moral support from an online petition!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not just a petition, it is a campaign. It has even made it to South London Press as well as backed by Forest Hill Society. A lot of the parents in Fairlawn School and Horniman School support this campaign!


I am therefore puzzled at your ignorance, Growlybear?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I'm rather puzzled as to why you think I am ignorant? Surely refusing to accept that your petition is too late and aimed at the wrong body demonstrates quite a degree of ignorance?


Perhaps some of these parents at Fairlawn and Horniman Schools who supposedly support what has now become a 'campaign' rather than a petition should have voiced their views more strongly at the consultation meetings in January and put forward viable suggestions for keeping the nursery open. Or was it the case that the other parents understood and accepted the reasons for closing the nursery and the process that was followed?


yas Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is not just a petition, it is a campaign. It

> has even made it to South London Press as well as

> backed by Forest Hill Society. A lot of the

> parents in Fairlawn School and Horniman School

> support this campaign!

>

> I am therefore puzzled at your ignorance,

> Growlybear?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Growlybear Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Perhaps some of these parents at Fairlawn and Horniman Schools who supposedly support what has

> now become a 'campaign' rather than a petition should have voiced their views more strongly at

> the consultation meetings in January and put forward viable suggestions for keeping the nursery

> open. Or was it the case that the other parents understood and accepted the reasons for closing

> the nursery and the process that was followed?


It sounds more like that if more of these people in favour of keeping the nursery open actually enrolled kids there, then it wouldn't be in this mess. After all, it is closing it due to lack of numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Growlybear, as a fellow Fairlawn Parent, i feel it is my duty to inform that

3 members of staff are facing redundancies, 2 members of staff may have reduced hours, one will escape reduncancy by virtue of being pregnant.


As for the parents whose children were on the list to go to Fairlawn Nursery, 2 will go to a catholic school (one muslim, one eschewed catholisimn in favour of a different religion).


I was in a consultation meeting i did not hear a growlybear type of person voicing their concerns about this nursery going or expressing remorse (many parents at the very least expressed remorse). So you are not in a position to judge fellow parents.

Above all, this campaign is supported by fellow Fairlawn Parents as well as Horniman School and Forest Hill Society. Because if it is successful both our school and the wider community will benefit from it. So once again, your ignorance of what goes on in our school is puzzling to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a kind of person who is attacking a campaign which is not only good for his children's school but for wider community as well!


Yes, i do hang out in cafes in Peckham, does that qualify me any less to undertake a campaign which i believe in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We get that you're upset about this, but I don't think anyone has been insensitive to that fact - unless your definition of insensitive is "saying absolutely anything that contradicts my understanding of the world".


Suggesting that people who disagree with you must be childless and therefore not be entitled to an opinion could equally be construed as insensitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

everybody is entitled to their opinion! but it is not nice being called a liar, arrogant etc... it could be done in a nicer way especially by fellow parents, i felt!


my situation is that i will be forced to pay for my child's nursery fee as 15 hours of child care doesn't translate into private nurseries very well. i may or may not be able to afford it as we are a one income family (my husband is a contractor, i should add). so i may even have to send my child to a catholic school nursery come September along with my other friends who are in the same situation as me.


so if you were in my situation, would you like to highlight your local nursery closing due to cuts is not great thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get you're upset and angry at the response you have had to your petition which has been clearly demonstrated with the posts you have been making.


As you are saying it is a campaign, can I ask AGAIN what the objective of the campaign now is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was in your position, I'd want to do something practical. So far on this thread, you appear to have claimed that the point of the petition/campaign is:


1. to stop the nursery from closing

2. to hightlight your perception that this is as a result of political decisions about cuts

3. to express solidarity with the nursery staff

4. to express that you are upset that this has affected you personally


People on this thread have tried to get you to clarify your objectives, to point out to you that you can't actually achieve 1. with the petition because that isn't legally possible and to get more clarity on what your evidence is for 2 (which you still haven't provided beyond rumour).


No-one actually called you a liar, but asked for evidence for your assertions. When you admitted you were mispresenting rumour as fact, you kinda branded yourself there.


It isn't nice to be called arrogant, but if you refuse to listen to anyone who doesn't just say "well done Yas", it's understandable that people have inferred that - particularly when you have been hostile first.


We understand that you are upset and angry, but how on earth are you helping things by lashing out at everyone like a petulant kid?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Let me try to reassure you those of you who concerned about the tree: the person who coordinated the decorating of the tree worked in arboriculture and chose the materials involved specifically because they would not damage the tree at all. And as planned, the tree has already been returned to its usual state. Oh, and...   OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE WE ARE DULWICH HAMLET AND WE'VE GONE AND WON THE LEAGUE
    • I'd say salary and rent are quite different in Vietnam as well - but I doubt you are being paid/pay those rates either
    • I do have a slight problem spending £17 for Cơm tấm, given it costs $1.20 in Saigon. Hard for me to square that. The menu does look authentic though but yeah waaay too expensive for me.
    • A nice pro cycling article from a pro cyclist by the way it is written.  Ultimately every road user, including cyclists, should obey the rules so the new law won't actually have any effect, apart from the odd cyclist who breaks the rules.  But back to reality, from experience, cyclists don't obey the rules, with the odd one stopping at lights or not riding on the footpath, and whilst the new law maybe unproportional to deaths, surly preventing even one pedestrian death is a good thing. Or do you disagree @malumbu ? Why are the cycling lobby so inflamed by this new law? It's there to prevent accidents and save a few more lives so if they are all cycling sensibly there should be no problem, but it's seen as an assault on freedom of cycling. Obviously it isn't, no one is being told not to cycle, just that if they cause a death or serious injury then there are consequences.  So why the angst dear cyclists ? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...