Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear Admin


I would like a fecking good moan because a detail of the way that you run your forum is inconvenient for me/obstructs the smooth progression of my personal agenda. For ease of interpretation I will be willing to break my complaint down into the areas of how come this doesn't exist?, how come such-and-such can but I can't?, and a final miscellaneous category entitled whyyyyy?. Please could you let me know where I can stick my thread?

*approaches nervously and tentatively*



I think the only mistake that Admin appear to have made here is to basically spoil the lot of us over the years! Most of us, in all probability, now take this Forum for granted - myself included.


When we attempt to log onto it, we expect it to be there, functioning without fault with all of its trimmings. If it slows down we complain, if a thread develops a malfunction we express further displeasure, and if a post disappears we throw the toys out of the pram (well I do!) and so on. Now that Admin have more or less decided to do away with signatures we communicate our dissatisfaction once more - most vociferously. It's only natural, we are merely human after all. However, we should in all fairness stop and remind ourselves that this Forum is not a right...we are not entitled to access it as of right, by law, or under some contractual arrangement. If, after years of permitting users of his forum to enjoy signatures, Admin in his wisdom now decides this should no longer be the case, then (it is my belief) that he is entitled to do so.


The decision may appear inconvenient and even unfair to some, but, at the end of the day we should all remember that Admin could shut this forum down if he felt so inclined. And, to be honest, I wouldn't blame him given the hard time he is currently experiencing - not only on this thread, but in the Lounge too. I too have had my spats with Admin over various issues (still do), but, in the interests of forum harmony, I prefer to keep them private.


I suspect this post might not find favour with some of you - so be it. However, I actually sympathise with Admin on this occasion as it is my view that he is being treated unfairly harshly.



*ducks*


Edited to comply with Sue's request (see subsequent post)

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> bignumber5 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > nobody's perfect

>

> I beg to differ :)) >:D<


xxxxxxxxx


Yeh we'd sort of picked that up :)):)):))


Edited to say: LadyMuck, please occasionally use that big key on the right of your keyboard, in fact the biggest key, with an arrow on it.


It takes your cursor down the page so that you can have the occasional space between your sentences, ie it divides your text into paragraphs so that it is readable :)


Edited again to say: You must have discovered this big key, because you do have a space at the top and bottom, just an indigestible mass of text in the middle! In my opinion, obviously.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Edited to say: LadyMuck, please occasionally use

> that big key on the right of your keyboard, in

> fact the biggest key, with an arrow on it.

>

> It takes your cursor down the page so that you can

> have the occasional space between your sentences,

> ie it divides your text into paragraphs so that it

> is readable :)

>

> Edited again to say: You must have discovered this

> big key, because you do have a space at the top

> and bottom, just an indigestible mass of text in

> the middle! In my opinion, obviously.



Acted upon!;-)

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ladymuck, consider my cap doffed in your general

> direction.



*blushes*


Oh my oh my...I am speechless ...absolutely speechless...blimey...


Why thank you mockney piers.


*walks away slightly dazed*

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That surely is truly reckless Sue! ::o


I have to say that I totally agree with you KalamityKel (tu):)-D>:D<(!)(td)(6)(?):'(:)):-$:-S::o;-):(:XB)...oh, and have a ((((KK)))) and some xxxx too!

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> isn't it great when the everyone is smiling and

> the bitching is over.:)



What? Don't you bloody well start!(6)


Only jesting karter...only jesting...hee hee...yes, of course you are quite right xxxx

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...