Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> I think Admin/The Chair is/are being a bit slack

> with this one. They will kick one out of the

> Drawing Room sooner than you can

> say............well,woof for example. How about

> kicking one into the Drawing Room for a change?


*attempts to look serious*


Yes, in fact we could commence a "class action" against them for failing to act with due speed and diligence.

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Declan Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > How's this boss?

> >

> >--------------------

> >Gr*wl

>

> Fine, it simply tells me you're a growler


I dunno admin... I'm sure there must be a profit making organisation based on growling... ;-)

Oh benevolent dictator Sir, what was the point of writing that and pointing us to that direction if we can't have signatures anymore? And since when were all of them 'silly'? I thought mine were useful and of a public service (accepting you don't want me to say I am a Humanist celebrant of course, which I am, but that was doctored out, and then the rest of my useful signature was cut along with everyone's.
Sean may have meant that some of us choose to have a silly signature though I doubt he could argue they were all silly. I think, not that it matters a hoot, that anything of public interest should be allowed. I for one would want to use your services PR as I'm not a church goer but it would probably depend on my being able to PM you before I took my last breath.

PR - what is with the constant sniping?


To the best of my knowledge I have welcomed you at forum drinks, provided you with an early idea with a story you shared with us , and agreed with you publicly on many occassions, and disagree with others. So what's with the constant pettiness? I think you believe you are fighting some noble fight but I don't see the masses rising up behind you, so it might be worth counting to ten


The "silly" in my post above refers to "recreational" sigs such ss woof's and declan's above. The idea was to keep THIS thread for a serious discussion about non-silly sigs. People are still allowed to have sigs as you well know, but admin has put a stop on promotional sigs


[Edit: Just saw Declan point out much the same]


The councillor's sig which appears to be a problem is a useful contact number for someone who is involved in day to day running of local services - not that he gets anything but grief for his trouble. it is, on the scale of things, a far more useful service than a folk club or someones beliefs.


Benevolent Dictator - I am, unfortunately neither. Not only do I not run this place, I fail to see how the person who puts his own money and time into offering a free service to local people can be so maligned. But if I WAS the person who runs this forum, I probably wouldn't be as benevolent, on that you are correct

Declan Wrote:

for one would want to use your services

> PR as I'm not a church goer but it would probably

> depend on my being able to PM you before I took my

> last breath.



*makes Sign of the Cross and sprinkles Holy Water on Declan*


In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen



Sean,if you read your previous post it is a bit schoolteacherish. I know you are a moderator or whatever it's called but as you have said it's not your forum there possibly wasn't the need for your post as Admin seemed to be coping fine with it. No offence intended.


As for the quote above, and I don't know either of you, but could PR's signature may have helped her survive financially in these difficult times by bringing in some business. It may be dead out there but every little helps! Perhaps it may explain the sniping you refer to.

I know you are a moderator or whatever it's called


Forum ettiquette may be a constantly evolving concept, but i've always been of the impression that outing the moderators was extremely bad form, along with outing people's true identities. No, not against any written rules, but bad form nonetheless.



Well if you are accusing me of a breach of etiquette then it's one I'm not aware of given moderators have willingly advised that they were one when asked.May I ask where you got the impression it was 'bad form'? As for outing people's true identities, I use my real name. Why don't you? Have you a good reason not to?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...