Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Lady Muck, I'll be PM'ing you on my deathbed.


Oooh, the excitement of it all!


> Seems that's when it works best.


Erm...how many times have you been that close to death then?



Thanks for the

> blessing though.


It's all part of the Service. PATER NOSTER, qui es in caelis, sanctificetur nomen tuum...



Well to be honest I don't know how to measure it as I might not have known about it a number of times. I once saw a UFO and they could have landed and shot me in an instance. So as you can see it's a difficult one to answer.


While you are here and given the topic recently raised on this thread of it being bad form to out people's true identities. Might you be an Irish priest in reality given your use of Latin?

I was not talking about my Humanist Funeral signature which was cut from my signature first with the rest left alone.

I am now talking about the community spirited stuff such as links to blood donor site, Kings College Hospital site, writing a Will, etc. I make no money from that but it was deleted for me. (Having said that I don't make much money from the Humanist Funerals work and have never got a 'gig' from this site. I certainly could not afford the ?150 I was quoted for 3 months.)

You write, "I think you believe you are fighting some noble fight but I don't see the masses rising up behind you, so it might be worth counting to ten". Could you sound more patronising? Can you read PMs? You certainly can't read my emails. I have been getting a lot of support, and I thank those who take the time to do so, for it.

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Well to be honest I don't know how to measure it

> as I might not have known about it a number of

> times. I once saw a UFO and they could have landed

> and shot me in an instance. So as you can see it's

> a difficult one to answer.


*adopts an intellectual expression*


Yes, of course - such a thought had not occurred to me.



> While you are here and given the topic recently

> raised on this thread of it being bad form to out

> people's true identities. Might you be an Irish

> priest in reality given your use of Latin?


Let's just say that, as a titled Lady of means with nothing better to do all day, I dabble...wafer and a drop of wine?

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Shouldn't you hear my confession first?


You are quite correct...I've been testing the new batch of wine today...my apologies for this minor lapse...


Now, as for your confession...please go ahead...


*leads Declan to a sinister looking double cupboard*

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

I dread how many Our

> Fathers you're going to give me.


So you should...the answer is on the EDF Drinks' Thread (The Lounge)...it was of paramount importance that I make an example of you. Now where is your Rosary?

LM/Declan - we've all 'ad a laff but another reminder to keep the thread on topic please? This ain't the Lounge (yet)


PR - if you think you response to my initial post about redirecting the conversation was reasonable and proportionate I can only wonder

Bottom line, of you don't like it then, frankly, fuck off and start your own forum with your own rules.


Plenty of things I'd do differently if I ruled the roost. For a start I'd ban all signatures as they're ugly and they clutter the place. I've always said the EDF's strength is its simplicity. No avatars, no thumbs up or down of comments, no poster ratings etc.


Sigs add clutter and PR was the worst offender, somehow its very worthiness made it even worse as you had to hate yourself for being uncivic minded everytime you had to wade past its elephantine awfulness on-every-bloody-comment.


But then I don't go to the enourmous investment of time, effort and expense to provide the largest possible number of people with a satisfactory, quality, free and effective service do I, as I'm far too lazy and happy for someone else to

do the work, so I'll thank admin for all his effort rather than project my own inadequacies on to him.

I'm not at all. You've assumed I'm meaning someone is/has gone round saying "I'm the administrator... yadda yadda" when what I meant was that those helping to do the admins duties use the account administrator. Would it not be more appropriate to be called something else? Tis all. Didn't wanna make a big deal out of it.


I much prefer the thingy over there next to the thing that does that thing approach to life when it comes to explanations :)

I'm not defensive - I'm just preventing untruths from becoming common currency. I didn't ask you if you thought the account was used by anyone other than admin - you stated baldly and repeatedly that it was. And you did that for a reason presumably? Or do you just write any thought that comes into your head?


You barged into a thread and said "off topic but" and then made a false allegation - When Piers pointed out it wasn't true you tried again and now you are crying about being called on it?


You COULD just say you were wrong and apologise gracefully

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not defensive - I'm just preventing untruths

> from becoming common currency. I didn't ask you if

> you thought the account was used by anyone other

> than admin - you stated baldly and repeatedly that

> it was. And you did that for a reason presumably?

> Or do you just write any thought that comes into

> your head?

>

> You barged into a thread and said "off topic but"

> and then made a false allegation - When Piers

> pointed out it wasn't true you tried again and now

> you are crying about being called on it?

>

> You COULD just say you were wrong and apologise

> gracefully



hang on a sec... are you picking on me for a particular reason?


What exactly have I said that you believe I deserve such a talking down to AND in such a public manner? How can I apologise for something I have no idea what YOU are talking about?


You make a very bad habit of reading deeper into the things unnecessarily and then pursue in a character assassination, yes I will accuse you of something (as it seems that is what you are wanting).


On many an occassion I can recall when you, SeanMC, have answered an admin q in your own name speaking on behalf of admin. No I don't care to trail through the various posts tracking anything down to prove a point. you have riled me in to response.


If anyone should do any aplogising it should be you. You're not exactly setting a good example to others with your personal attacks as displayed above.


No don't bother responding I'm really not interested.

there is nothing to hide.


Only the admin uses the admin account.


The chair is passed on occasionally, thus far four holders, myself the first and briefest of the four.


There is a family room moderator, it is one person, it is not the admin.


There are moderators and they cajole politely behind the scenes using their own names.


Or so I'm told ... Unless that's what they want you to think.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
    • So dangerous!    Can you be more specific about the road this was in and when you report it?  Maybe there’s some CCTV footage available
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...