Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mr Roll Deep.


I'm afraid i have to disagree with you.

An example being: If some young lady were to be getting inappropriate PM's from someone, should the forum members be not be made aware?? or should she keep this to herself?? or wait till admin pics up on it??


Just my opinion

"I'm afraid i have to disagree with you. An example being: If some young lady were to be getting inappropriate PM's from someone, should the forum members be not be made aware?? or should she keep this to herself?? or wait till admin pics up on it??"


She should contact the Police. And not distract from the OP's point.

^ +1

PM'ing threatening or insulting messages to people is wrong.

And if they have to hide behind a pm to make those insults etc for whatever reason then they should run the risk of having them posted openly.

Nobody should expect to receive PM's of that sort of nature... surely?

>

> She should contact the Police. And not distract

> from the OP's point.


Really? How quickly will the police be able to pick up on this over posting on the forum?

And surely you're not saying that the OP's is more important than a forum member being threatened??

I would gladly have my thread hijacked if it were to help someone.

I'm afraid not, Brum. A jumped up Guardian reader started beating their chest in protest last night after recieving a terse private instruction, and proceeded to write the content of the note on the blackboard, with a few porkies added to the slanderous mix. I was merely a bystander in the whole torrid affair.


Bottom line. If you recieve a private message calling you outside or any other nastiness, simply take a picture of your arsehole or a big dump you're proud of and send it to the offending belligerent. Honestly, it's all a big fuss over nothing. Most people on here don't know what the other looks like so there's not much chance of having your nose bloodied over piffling comments made online whilst you're out 'n' about in the real world.

Headed...



PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL



Then agreed however, if quoting verbatim "abuse" then Admin should deal with the matter privately


Otherwise there's always.......*Dum , Dum ,Dummmmmm*


http://maps.google.com/maps/place?client=safari&rls=en&oe=UTF-8&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=coventry&fb=1&ftid=0x4870b151656e22b7:0x4f660f5564f0689&ei=49FvS6WeHIzw0gSauOXXBA&sa=X&oi=geocode_result&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CA8Q8gEwAA


W**F

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That a shocking story.  Spurs?  You appear to be lost.  Haringey is very much the other side of the river.  
    • Every year they ask for more and every year it is an exhausting process pushing back on that for local residents and councillors. What annoys me is that at the post event consultation/ feedback this year, I specifically asked them if the rumours around applying for two weekends next year were true. They told me no. So that was a lie. Anyway, we go again. 
    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...