Jump to content

Recommended Posts

From Friday 10th April, as part of a two week TfL trial to increase bus driver protection from COVID-19, passengers on routes P13 and 484, along with other bus routes operated by Abellio's Walworth bus garage will only allow passengers to exit and enter using the rear door only.


During this trial, passengers won't have to touch in using Oyster or Contactless.

Are you for real do you dboy?? I honestly think there a lot more to worry about than a few unpaid fares , you probably don?t even use buses , who cares we are all going to have to pay more tax , i for one have no issue with forking out a little more when this is all over

In all honesty I doubt if they will even notice if people dont pay.


The number 12 from Oxford Circus to Peckham or the other way round is not known as the charity bus for nothing.


Nobody pays. Next time when you use the bus in better times just look and take note.


The drivers need to be better looked after, As Khan's father was a bus driver you would have thought he would have taken better care of them.

Yes, I AM for real and YES I do use the buses.

If you can afford and want to pay more tax good on you, but don't expect everyone to be on whatever you earn.


Paulie herne hill Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you for real do you dboy?? I honestly think

> there a lot more to worry about than a few unpaid

> fares , you probably don?t even use buses , who

> cares we are all going to have to pay more tax , i

> for one have no issue with forking out a little

> more when this is all over

Nothing wrong with me pal.


Yes they are dying, have you had pneumonia or seen how it kills, I promise you it's horrible to experience first hand,


HAVE you ever seen a loved one on NIV {non invasive ventilation), I have and it ain't nice to see or pleasant for the person receiving the treatment. I've probably experienced and seen things you never have and that would make you shiver if I shared them with you, so before you get all high and mighty and start trying to lecture, I suggest you wind it in

FineWhine Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> for goodness sake... get a grip who gives a toss

> about some blinking bus fares in this time...


Agreed!


Unbelievable. The number of people actually on buses is negligible, and if it's solely keyworkers, I don't give a toss if it's free for them. Bigger issues to worry about.

rupert james Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In all honesty I doubt if they will even notice if

> people dont pay.

>

> The number 12 from Oxford Circus to Peckham or the

> other way round is not known as the charity bus

> for nothing.

>

> Nobody pays. Next time when you use the bus in

> better times just look and take note.

>

> The drivers need to be better looked after, As

> Khan's father was a bus driver you would have

> thought he would have taken better care of them.


It's no longer the charity bus, they changed it so everyone has to get on the front door and exit from the other two doors in March.

gromit3:16 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> if you don't pay it's at your own risk, you never

> know when a transport officer will be checking

> fares.


They're currently not working on buses either due to social distancing.

gromit3:16 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the buses were empty when you had to get on the

> front for the past couple of weeks. The buses

> going through Peckham are now packed again since

> you now have to go through the back door and no

> one is paying.


Since when? I was at DKH this afternoon and a P13 was empty going to Streatham. Regardless of the 'free' ride.

People are really not very bright are they, if they're going out just to cruise the buses now they are free.


The buses are running so key workers can get to work - and people who have to travel are able to.

Travelling to work is one of the highest risk of catching the virus.


I think TfL have more important things to think about than fares at the moment.


Having said that, maybe they should increase the fares for all travel, unless you can prove you need to take your journey.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> I think TfL have more important things to think

> about than fares at the moment.

>

> Having said that, maybe they should increase the

> fares for all travel, unless you can prove you

> need to take your journey.


I don't see any benefit in increasing fares either, Most people are using the buses sensibly during the lockdown, only using them for essential journeys. Raising fares won't fill the loss of revenue with such low numbers using them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...