The Lounge
The place to relax and chat about anything.
22,630 topics in this forum
-
- 33 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 2 replies
- 612 views
-
- 0 replies
- 207 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 13 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 34 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 56 replies
- 6.4k views
-
- 8 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 26 replies
- 2.1k views
-
Coronavirus e-news: practical & benefits info for disabled people & others from Disability Rights UK
- 1 reply
- 899 views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 718 views
-
- 3 replies
- 749 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1k views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 6 replies
- 916 views
-
- 0 replies
- 393 views
-
- 4 replies
- 604 views
-
- 0 replies
- 628 views
-
- 3 replies
- 764 views
-
- 0 replies
- 482 views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 1 reply
- 558 views
-
- 0 replies
- 478 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
By beansprout · Posted
Now I have heard everything…..not send your kid to a school because you don’t like the name - so to get my head around this, if school is outstanding, parents won’t send their child there because of name of school? Or have I not understood? -
A quick Google says that it is not undersubscribed unlike many subject schools so those claims mentioned above may not be true. Last Ofsted was good. You are definitely right about the money. This is what trusts do. Remove word ‘subject’ above Remove word ‘subject’ above I can’t edit my ridiculous errors but would like to apologise for messy post -
I have heard claims that people don't send their children there because of the name of the school..? I genuinely cannot get my head around this one. The school is named after the road it is on which is named after the history of the area! 'Grove Primary School' is potentially the most boring name they could have come up with, and for a school struggling financially, is rebranding the school really the best use of funds? -
By Forest Hill Climber · Posted
Certainly unique, can't argue with that.
-