Jump to content

Dog fouling


S Hensman

Recommended Posts

It is a pain I agree. I am also fed up with having to dodge scattered broken glass, so dangerous for toddler feet as well as dogs paws, and don't get me started on the increasing scourge of chewing gum that is littering and disfiguring pavements, especially the area around Northcross Road. My other big beef is discarded chicken bones and cakes like chocolate brownies ( either, potentially life threatening, can land a dog in the vet with extremely expensive bills).


What can be done about all these anti social, and in many cases health threatening, littering habits?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So predictable as soon as anyone dares mention dog shit on the pavement first mate adds in the chicken bone litter argument & the danger to dogs. no litter is good - no one should drop litter. but I would rather pick up litter than other people's dog shit. This morning outside Heber Primary school there were 3 more big piles of dog mess right outside the main gates on Heber road and on Jennings Road.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

rahrahrah, I have never excused it, quite the contrary. However, I also happen to find broken glass pretty obnoxious too and wonder about the mentality of someone that leaves either dog dumps or broken glass in public areas for others to walk into.



Jamesb, well it'll be interesting to see how this works and how well it works. I'm in favour of the principle of owner registration in the hope it leads to more reaponsibe dog ownership, but my hunch is that those who do not give toss and are happy to leave their dog's dumps around the neighbourhood will be hard to pin down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"We have community wardens so if you witness a dog owner allowing their dog to foul on school entrances etc and not bothering to bag and bin it, who ya gonna call........."


I'm not so sure you'd get anywhere. I've just come back from a football match where police horses were making one helluva mess in the roads and some poor souls were having to tread in it owing to the crowds.


Who should I complain to this time ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overhill Road is rife with dog mess from a particularly large canine(s). Some days you have a better chance dodging cars in the road than dodging piles of poo on the pavement. As well as an annoyance surely it must be a health hazard.


Whilst a scheme like DNA testing would be welcome, I suspect those owners who do not feel responsible for clearing up after their dog probably have no interest in registering them either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree with you LoulaRose about Overhill Road. It makes me sick having to walk down the road. I contacted Councillor Andy Shawcross about the problem last year and he was helpful about trying to do something about it (which entailed reminding street cleaners they are supposed to clean it up and spraying some dog litter notices on the pavement). But the problem seems to have got bad again. Maybe someone got a new dog for Christmas - someone who shouldn't have one because they aren't willing to take responsibility for it. The DNA registration needs to be mandatory - both for this kind of problem and so owners who abandon their dogs can be prosecuted.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone is excusing dog poo.

But this thread IS about dog poo, so let's not dilute it with 'other forms of litter', bothersome environmental concerns such as neighbour noise, rowdy behaviour or airplanes overhead !!

It does smart of cover-up.


Dog poo is different, it comes out of dog's bums and smells high-heaven and gets walked into your hallway - it's in a class of it's own.


Disgusting animal excrement.


And it's depressing to see it on the pavements of our streets.

There is no excuse and, to be honest, I think all dogs in cities should be DNA-recorded and then we'd soon see a massive decline in dog fouling as samples from streets are matched against the deliquent dogs. Big fines. Big difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's part of the problem you don't always see them do it! Unless you sat there with a camera - we get to school at 8.40 in the mornings & the fresh piles of dog poo are already there suggesting that these particular dog owners are walking their dogs early when they know there aren't wardens or many people around.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

" I think all dogs in cities should be DNA-recorded and the we'd soon see a massive decline in dog fouling as samples from streets are matched against the deliquent dogs. Big fines. Big difference."


It is always easier to target the others.

Why not the police start collecting human fingerprints and then run the database against those found on the rubbish that are left on streets ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took the dog in our shop for a walk last week. He curled one out in the park, I picked it up and put it in the bin. Then on the way back he did another much bigger one on the pavement outside someone's house! I had only taken the one bag with me and it was used for the first poo...


I had to phone my colleague to bring me a bag whilst I stood guard for 10 minutes. Next time I'll take two bags!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a huge issue esp' on Friend Road and Dunstan's Road where schoolkids walk - and there are dog bins there as well! I've written to the council about it but there is only so much they can do.


If you are a dog owner, please you have a legal duty to clean up every time your dog poops in a public place.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-35378499


^ Superb idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very impressed. :)



phobic3000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I took the dog in our shop for a walk last week.

> He curled one out in the park, I picked it up and

> put it in the bin. Then on the way back he did

> another much bigger one on the pavement outside

> someone's house! I had only taken the one bag with

> me and it was used for the first poo...

>

> I had to phone my colleague to bring me a bag

> whilst I stood guard for 10 minutes. Next time

> I'll take two bags!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

phobic3000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I took the dog in our shop for a walk last week.

> He curled one out in the park, I picked it up and

> put it in the bin. Then on the way back he did

> another much bigger one on the pavement outside

> someone's house! I had only taken the one bag with

> me and it was used for the first poo...

>

> I had to phone my colleague to bring me a bag

> whilst I stood guard for 10 minutes. Next time

> I'll take two bags!!



That sounds like your dog was "two shits to the Wyndham" road there


(Sorry couldn't resist)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't think there is much in the way of pride about running that store; I think there used to be and not so long ago. It's messy - the fruit and veg section never looks attractive.  Contrast with Lidl and Morrisons that in my experience (and I appreciate others may have had a different one) always looks much better stocked and attractively presented.  They don't seem to stock stuff that I would expect a store of that size to have - I looked for pudding rice the other week and couldn't find any and nor could the staff working there.  Is it that unusual  ? Doesn't anyone make rice pudding ? I guess not.  You have weight certain fruit and veg - I'm OK with that - but why, on a Saturday when it's going to be busy, not ensure that the scales  are all stocked with plenty of labels rather than there only be one working by 10am ? And don't get me started on so-called "Nectar prices"... It's got a dominant position and it's a cash-cow that the management don't seem to care about.  
    • Can someone please explain who "Clean Air Dulwich" are? 
    • FredMarsh, I sympathise with you. I suspect the coral fencing at the entrance is to prevent people legging it out of store with unpaid for goods in hand. It does feel a bit like herding cattle as you describe it. Perhaps the reduction in customers is a response to this and the lack of previously available services.  I find self check out is quicker if I do it myself and since the new self service points have been installed the screens work much better as they are as of today still newish. The old ones were "knackered" and continued to regularly fail.  I had to buy some whisky as a present for someone yesterday, the Sainsbury staff took it away, removed the security tags and returned it, so that all went simply.  Unfortunately the days of what was the original Sainsburys in Peckham and Forest Hill are long gone, as are many of the old shops I remember from the mid 70's, i.e. Kennedy's. The world continually changes and as we get older we have to keep up.  I saw something really sad in Peckham yesterday, a very, very old woman walking down Hanover Park by Primark on the corner with Rye Lane, bent almost half over, pushing her own four wheel trolley along, taking her time.  Made me  realise how lucky I am.   Yes, checking the receipt to make sure Nectar has been applied is always worth doing. Ditto Tesco Old Kent Road this week were what the label of the stack of fruit said one price and even with the Tesco card, the price at checkout was different, that resulted in photo's and it still being checked by Customer Service...... As for "Sainsburys always being horrible", I have to disagree with you on that. 
    • One Dulwich   Campaign Update | 3 May Parliament debates LTNs – please fill in the questionnaire by 6 May Parliament will debate two petitions – “Carry out an independent review into Low Traffic Neighbourhoods” and “Exempt Blue Badge drivers from Low Traffic Neighbourhoods” – at 4.30 pm on Monday 20 May in the Grand Committee Room above Westminster Hall. Please fill in this short questionnaire about your experience of the Dulwich LTNs, as your comments will help to inform the debate. The deadline for this is very soon – 10am on Monday 6 May. We have written to our MP Helen Hayes, pointing out that her constituents represent the second highest number of those who requested both petitions, and asking her to take part in the debate in order to represent the two-thirds majority of people living and working in Dulwich who asked for the Dulwich LTNs to be reconsidered. Because these petitions are directed at Parliament, not Southwark Council, we hope that Helen Hayes will speak up for her constituents on this occasion. You might want to encourage her to take part by emailing her at [email protected]. We have also reminded her that a group of Blue Badge holders have petitioned the Leader of Southwark Council to be allowed through the Dulwich Village junction because of the daily difficulties, distress and – in some cases – severe pain suffered by disabled and other vulnerable car-dependent constituents who are now forced to take long and circuitous detours in stop-start traffic along boundary roads. You can watch the debate – and, we hope, our MP representing our interests – on Parliament tv, or you can attend in person. Thank you for your support. The One Dulwich Team  SUPPORT ONE DULWICH 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...