Dulwich dweller

Not necessarily. The types of crimes may and do change. Coldharbour lane for instance had one stretch of it back in the 90's that was an open crack market. That has gone and now it's full of late night bars the crime levels are still quite high but not drug related. More violence and anti social stuff but crime all the same. Football is another one. There's much less toe to toe violence to the extent it's quite rare but the arrests for drug possession ( bugle) have soared. As has the numbers for hate chanting / racial/ homophobic chanting.

I'm not and yes i know they are. I'm also aware of that. I mentioned the carnival in my post

Resources/ prioritising? Most of London's OB will be over in west London for a few days. Also if he's not known to them where do they look? How much manpower can they afford looking for a thick racist that's put up some unsavoury graffiti? It's hard enough getting them to come out when you've been burgled. That's quite an assumption. You are assuming those that know him are aware of what he's done. I wouldn't have known about his antics if i didn't use this forum. I'm a long term resident, get about the manor on a regular basis but don't recognise the geezer. Nor has anyone else on here.

Blimey. They look tougher to call than last weeks.

It's a great job apart from the time one finishes It was much easier when i was in my 20's/30's. Still fun all the same.

Yes. What genre of music?

You said-- you just know this will be spun as overwhelming support for Southwark's car/street plans-- I don't just know. It never crossed my mind until you made the assertion. Organisers' responsibilities a formal risk assessment is not required, but you should think about what could go wrong and plan accordingly; major things to consider are: fire, bad weather, electricity and vehicles entering, leaving and remaining within the area of your road closure to close the road, barriers will be provided by FM Conway (subject to availability) during the week before the party organisers are responsible for putting these into place to close the road at the agreed time a clear route, at least 4 metres wide, must remain along the entire length of the road closure for emergency vehicle access

Try this site. It usually works to bypass paywalls. https://paywallreader.com/

It never crossed my mind. You do have a habit of trying to force your theories onto others and presenting them as facts. We had a closed street day here a few years ago. It was a success, fun, well attended and was never weaponised to push anything.

All cars? Every single car parked on the road? First i've heard of that. Hardly a vote winner and it would be a huge hit in revenue streams for them.

In your opinion

Proper south London lingo that, mush. Absolutely and ditto. Oh i do. I also know that many residents aren't fussed about Gala doing their thing. It's all about opinions isn't it!

Did you not play in the street as a kid? It's a one off annual event. It's hardly going to give kids a habit. Who are you anyway? What with Gala and now trying to imply things that many others won;t agree with. What do you mean by - but do I want to encourage the idea of kids playing in the street- no ? For one they're not your kids, mush and secondly what makes you think you'll be encouraging anyone? We had the event last year and it was a success for both kids and parents/ neighbours. Even if i put my hand up and admit to feeling a bit nostalgic at the time. I presume you only live on one road so stick to encouraging the families and kids on YOUR road to come to your way of thinking and stop trying to piss on other peoples chips when it's none of your bloody business.

Yes. It gives me a reason to have an interest in the premier league again. Plus it's a bit of fun.

I'll have a go too.

Sorry to hear about your ordeal. Sounds absolutely horrendous. Hope you manage get some witnesses to come forward and get things resolved to your satisfaction.

I wasn't aware of that. I thought it was being mooted that is all. No. It's common land and shouldn't be used as a business venture.

I have plenty of experience dealing with the council when it comes to events/ licensing and i know what does and doesn't carry weight when voicing concerns. I do think there are valid concerns/ issues but that's me and not the council or how their process works. Mostly so yes and because as i explained i just can't see the council blocking a future application from Gala/ or another similar event unless there's been complete disregard for contractual agreements, safety issues, antisocial behaviour, reports of violence, drug dealing and open consumption plus other criminality that's clearly related to the event. Those are the things that Gala and the council are likely to focus on/point to when on the defensive. I'm not saying don't go and air your views/ concerns but i would keep my expectations low in regard to the outcome that you're hoping for. It's a PR exercise. They're not obliged to hold a meeting so perhaps not box ticking but their actions will show them in a good light and as being conscientious and caring. It's something that they and the council will no doubt point to if and when the need arises sometime in the future. I agree with you and for the reasons given above. It's possible but from my side of the fence i'd say it's doubtful because of the cost. Presuming the event was extended to two weekends the cost/ rental of the sound system, fencing, floor cover, rigging, lighting, security etc would multiply fourfold. It would be redundant during the week but that won't get you mates rates. They'd have to hike the ticket costs and risk pricing themselves out or range to their target audience. I'd imagine that the profit margins from a site the size of the Rye are not the highest given the running costs that such an event incurs. All the best with your meeting!

Is the distance/ location going to stop you from going? I really don't think that Gala will have any concerns about a meeting with concerned residents. They're under no obligation to do so. More browning points for them with the council and old bill. There is nothing that can be said that will prevent them from getting a future license for Peckham Rye. As explained previously it takes a lot more than complaints about noise and how the site is left/ reinstated before they get refused a licence. If it was a magnet for violence, open drug dealing and consumption then you might have a chance of getting whatever it is you want.

It's four bus stops away so hardly a deterrent unless one has mobility issues. Gala nor any other events organisers are under obligation to do what they've agreed to do. I'm sure if those who are serious and want to be heard will make the effort to attend the meeting. Whether their concerns have an impact or are taken seriously. Unless you can prove Gala have purposely chosen Peckham Levels as a means to deter people from attending i don't think it helps matters by implying that there's some sort of agenda or conspiracy going on. From following this thread it appears that's it's you with the agenda. Your display of arrogance in the post above ( Let's not pretend ) suggests that we're all in agreement with you.

This is a forum for comment and discussion. Do you only write positive things when offering opinions? Saying an offering of food is a bit pricey isn't ripping any ones legs from beyond them unless the person who's interpreted that way is an idiot and easily swayed. It isn't so easy supporting a new business if their product is rather pricey, rather scant and can be bought cheaper elsewhere in the area. I take it that you'll be supporting Jamaican vibes by treating yourself and your family to something that you can purchase cheaper at another DULWICH business 🙄

That was my first thought. Then again he may be having to fork out quite a bit for the pitch? Not sure as i haven't been up that bit for a while now.

Thanks. That's quite pricey.

How much did it cost?