Sue

Alec1 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------- > > All I read here is blame for postal > delays/non-deliveries on the recipient's end of > the journey, East Dulwich/Peckham. Has no one > considered that from the moment items are posted > they have a long journey, often via several > methods of transport, machinery for sorting etc > etc. Things can, and do get lost during that > journey. Putting the blame on postal > workers/offices locally is unfair. Have you actually read the rest of this thread, Alec1? Before the delivery office moved to Peckham, there might have been the occasional item "lost in the post". That is a completely different thing from a situation where enormous amounts of incoming post have been piled up in a known place for months.

🤣

All my prescription medication has been delivered by Royal Mail within a day or two after Lloyds Direct (previously Echo) have processed it. As has anything Covid test related. I assumed Royal Mail was giving such items priority. Where are your prescription medicines coming from, ribrob?

TheCat Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Slightly facetious comment.... > > But in winter, as a spectacle wearer, any donning > of the mask either inside or outside results in > almost immediate blindness through fogging...so I > do have to judge what I'm doing as to relative > risk....I.e. School pickup, risk of collecting the > wrong child:).... There are anti-fogging liquids and cloths for glasses.

This place has an advice line. I don't know if it advises individuals, but if not it may be able to point your friend in the direction of somewhere who does? https://www.equalityadvisoryservice.com/ Alternatively, apart from ACAS, the Citizens Advice Bureau would probably be able to help? Oh sorry, I see you already mentioned that.

https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/advice-and-guidance/sex-discrimination#:~:text=The%20Equality%20Act%202010%20says,known%20as%20discrimination%20by%20association) Did your friend ask the CEO what "the full picture" was that he told her she didn't know?

It was not the fact that underwear was being worn as outerwear. It was not obvious that it was underwear - not to me, anyway. It was what was pictured on it. I can't describe it, or I would probably get banned as well 🙄

Why have you started a duplicate thread in this section? And do I really have to spell out to you why some of your items for sale were inappropriate? A particular picture on what if I recall correctly was a vest or tee shirt, for example? I do not feel I want to describe it, but if anybody else saw it before it was removed they will know what I mean. It wasn't exactly something you could wear in a public place, put it like that ....

Rockets Wrote: ------------------------------------------------- > > But Helen Hayes is on the case....again.....!!! > > > 57934339?t=HWMKHmgVGBvfirQM2WqfwA&s=19 Hopefully this time her efforts may bear fruit .... She must be as tired of all this as we are .....

Three separate deliveries today! 1. A second hand book I've already had a refund on from eBay because it didn't arrive - somewhat annoying because now in all fairness I have to let the seller know, and refund the refund, as it were. 2. A packet of fabric samples posted a few weeks back. 3. A Christmas card (no date on it), a Private Eye dated 10 - 17 December and a financial statement dated 14 January. Since I took out the Private Eye subscription in November, this is only the second one I've got. The free Christmas cards that went with the subscription arrived last week (very usefully timed, not). Royal Mail seems to be delivering a totally random assortment of stuff, but at least some of what is arriving is from January! I am still waiting for some things which I know were posted in November/December.

Some of the items you listed for sale on here were not appropriate for a local community forum, and were removed by admin, if memory serves. Is it possible that the items you listed on Facebook's marketplace were considered similarly inappropriate? I don't know anything about how Facebook works, but could it be that your account was terminated for similar reasons? It may be too late now to recover that account, but maybe you could sign up to Facebook using a new account? (and every time you post on there, ask yourself "is this acceptable?") I am sorry you have been going through a hard time, and I hope things improve for you soon.

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Fully Responsible Is that? 🤣

I am getting a total mixture of mail. One second class item posted only a few days ago. One posted end of November (hospital letter, luckily feedback after the appointment and not notification of the date). Those two arrived at the same time 🙄 Still waiting for several items including financial post, books despatched weeks ago, and things intended for Christmas presents 😡 And of course no idea of what I should have got which I don't know has been sent, grammar.

heartblock Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sadly Southwark Council removed them - another > piece of history taken away with no consultation > or consideration... 😡

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-60069763.amp This article mentions the Sylvester Road office closure.

Porridge. Vegetables.

How are you now, Foxy? A lot better, I hope?

rachp Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It?s surprising how little awareness there is on > the log-burner issue, I think many people just > don?t realise how bad the impact is. I think it's only relatively recently that the impact has been publicised? (And no, I don't have one).

I don't understand the OP. There's a clear speed limit. And clear penalties for speeding. And an obvious camera at that spot. Which is near a school, if memory serves. Unlucky to be caught maybe, but twice? I can't understand how a lawyer could help?

ianr Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > The initial rollout was speedy but other > > countries caught up and overtook UK pretty > > quickly (with much higher vaccination rates > > to boot) > > Is there any mileage in the hypothesis that > vaccination uptake rates might be moderately > independent of the identity of the ruling party? Yes!

Sorry to hear this. Hope you get it back if wheover took it sees your post 😢

A good opportunity to talk to your children about what the pigeons are doing, I would have thought?

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Brideshead Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > 1st world (or should that be East Dulwich) > > problem? > > > > Impolite comment in a park? lol > > Aren't you the guy that chucked a massive tantrum > over a number of weeks because you couldn't get a > free newspaper and you thought a librarian was > rude to you? Click on their name and you can see the general tone of their posts.

According to reports in the press, numerous people had raised concerns about the lack of lighting and CCTV in that alleyway 😡 No doubt now that will be rectified. Stable doors, etc 😡

Excellent idea!