Sue

Yes I agree, that would be a sensible solution.

SteveT Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > people don't go out to drink, they do go out > to eat xxxxxx Speak for yourself :)) :)-D

But the issue with Melford Road, as I say, is not about the numbers of vehicles using it to turn off Lordship Lane, it's about the fact that even just one or two vehicles have difficulty passing, particularly if larger than a normal sized car. It may have become worse with more vehicles using it due to the no-right-turn at Underhill Road, but it was bad before that. Reversing the Underhill no-right-turn would not result in a trouble-free Melford Road. It might "ease" the bottleneck/congestion, as you say, but it certainly wouldn't cure it.

louisiana Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sue Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > People who put all their letters/qualifications > > after their name when they're totally > irrelevant > > in the context they're using their name > (grammar) > > And worse, people who include PhD in their email > address field, as part of their name. xxxxxxxxx No! I can't believe anyone does that !!!!

SimonM Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You should read the original thread - sorry don't > know where it is exactly. Basically the jams you > refer to - which are bad - were a consquence of > the totally unnecessary ban on right turns into > Underhill Road from the south circular. If you now > ban them into Melford then the congestion/jams > will just be shifted to Overhill/Beaval. xxxxxxx But Overhill Road is much wider than Melford Road, isn't it? Don't know Beaval Road and sorry haven't read the other thread, do you have a link? But the width of/parking in Melford Road, plus buses coming down it, would cause a problem with jams regardless of the number of vehicles involved, surely? Basically, there just wasn't room for one thing to pass another ......

People who end their emails "kind regards"

People who put all their letters/qualifications after their name when they're totally irrelevant in the context they're using their name (grammar)

Shome Mishtake Shurely? Ed.

That'll be Friday then :)) Faustus. Go on go on go on go on you know you want to :)) :)-D

Bet you don't remember the Moo Cow Bar in Streatham along that stretch, Jah Lush :)

Blues Run the Game - Bert Jansch

Humming from my computer fan

Why the objection? The bit of Melford Road at the Lordship Lane end was constantly jammed up with cars and buses trying to get past each other, and often not succeeding. It is far too narrow for traffic going both ways when you've got cars parked in the road as well, surely? And there's a bend in the road at that end, too, which made things worse.

Their chips are good! Edited to say: Nun's Head not the Duke, though the Duke did at one point have extraordinarily good chips, at an extraordinarily high price :)

Can't believe the police can still get fingerprints, don't burglars know about fingerprints??? Why didn't they wear gloves, duh ??? The burglars not the police .......

lenk Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > David Mc Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Oh WTF - can someone PM me with the details of > a > > reliable dealer?! Perhaps better placed in the > > "questions you never dared to ask" thread!!! > > > Hmm... the oldest policeman's trick in the book... > the old 'PM me their number' sting.. xxxxxxx :))

dazeykat Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > What sort of chavvy activities would such a > society indulge in? In case I want to join... xxxxxx Drinking Stella, sitting on settees, and calling your grandmother Nan :)) According to the Chav Questionnaire :)) Edited to say: If I were Chair of the Chav Society, the main activity would be Stella drinking ....

Bonnie Earl of Moray - Five Hand Reel

PeckhamRose Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm going Thursday. xxxxxxx going where on Thursday??

ratty Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Burnt down a disabled toilet aged 13! xxxxxx That's a good age for a toilet!

wtf ??? :))

bathsheba Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Louisa Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I'm not being funny, but what kind of idiot > waits > > for an hour to be served food? I would have > waited > > 20 minutes tops and then walked out or if I was > > that desperate for a stuipid pizza gone home > and > > made one myself! Some people! > > > > Louisa. > > Another bile filled response - wot a friendly > place this is. (td) xxxxxxxxx Well we're all different, and forums are full of different kinds of people who post in different ways. Bit like life really. Should we exclude everybody from the forum who doesn't fit in with our idea of what forum posters should be like? Would be very dull, no?

Well that got immediately lounged - so much for my bid to help the single people of ED :-S

You are my Sunshine - the Pine Ridge Boys :) (that's the you not the shine)

OMG I found myself saying "bored of" tonight :-$